Skip to main content

Self-reflexivity and Freedom: Toward a Prescriptive Theory of Conflict Resolution

  • Chapter
Conflict: Human Needs Theory

Part of the book series: The Conflict Series

Abstract

Conflict resolution deals with the conflictual behavioral relations of human beings and how these are best resolved. As such, it is classified as a social science. I would hope, however, that those of us who consider ourselves to be working within this field do not consider it a typical social science, one subject to the arguments, problems and controversies that characterize traditional social science. In particular, I would caution against the acceptance of the dichotomy between fact and value which defines contemporary mainstream social science, and which has led to an overemphasis upon quantitative methods in the name of an objectivity which is at best suspect. Conflict resolution should be a normative discipline; it should be prescriptive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Johan Galtung, Methodology and Ideology: Theory and Methods of Social Research, vol. 1 (Copenhagen: Christian Ejlers, 1977): 65.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eleonora Masini, “Needs and Dynamics,” in Katrin Lederer (ed.) with Johan Galtung and David Antal, Human Needs: A Contribution to the Current Debate (Cambridge MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain, 1980): 227–31 at 227.

    Google Scholar 

  3. John W. Burton, “Conflict Resolution as a Political System,” George Mason University Center for Conflict Analysis and Resolution Working Paper Series (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Abraham H. Maslow, Motivation and Personality (New York: Harper & Row, 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Paul Sites, Control, the Basis of Social Order (New York: Dunellen Press, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stephen Box, Deviance, Reality and Society (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Edwin O. Wilson, Sociobiology: The New Synthesis (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  8. John W. Burton, Deviance, Terrorism and War: The Process of Solving Unsolved Social and Political Problems (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1979): 72–3.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kevin Avruch and Peter Black, “A Generic Theory of Conflict Resolution: A Critique,” Negotiation Journal 3 (1987): 87–96 at 91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. John Burton and Dennis J. D. Sandole, “Expanding the Debate on Generic Theory and Conflict Resolution: A Response to a Critique,” Negotiation Journal 3 (1987): 97–9 at 97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Robert Boyd and Peter J. Richerson, Culture and the Evolutionary Process (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  12. John W. Burton, “The Need for Needs Theory,” paper presented at the Conference on Human Needs and Conflict Resolution, Warrenton, VA (July 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. C. Lewontin, Steven Rose, and Leon Kamin, Not in Our Genes (New York: Pantheon Books, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  14. John Eccles, The Human Psyche (New York: Springer Verlag International, 1980);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. John C. Eccles and Daniel N. Robinson, The Wonder of Being Human (New York: The Free Press, 1984);

    Google Scholar 

  16. Karl Popper and John Eccles, The Brain and Its Self (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. George Herbert Mead, Mind, Self and Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1934) 1974 edn.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Erich Fromm, The Sane Society (Greenwich Conn: Fawcett Publiations, Inc., 1955);

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fromm, The Heart of Man: Its Genius for Good and Evil (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1964);

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rollo May, Man’s Search for Himself (New York: W. W. Norton and Co., 1967);

    Google Scholar 

  21. May, Power and Innocence: A Search for the Sources of Violence (New York: W. W. Norton and Co. Inc, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Erich Fromm, The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Joseph A. Scimecca, Society and Freedom (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Erich Fromm, Escape From Freedom (New York: Rinehart, 1941).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Frithjof Bergmann, On Being Free (Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1990 John Burton

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scimecca, J.A. (1990). Self-reflexivity and Freedom: Toward a Prescriptive Theory of Conflict Resolution. In: Burton, J. (eds) Conflict: Human Needs Theory. The Conflict Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21000-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics