Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The Contemporary United States ((TCUS))

  • 21 Accesses

Abstract

In fifty years the American labour movement seemed to have come full circle. In 1929, on the eve of the Great Depression, the employers’ counter-offensive against unions launched at the end of the war had been so successful that the AFL was near the point of collapse. In a period of unparalleled prosperity unions had been outflanked by welfare capitalism, company unionism and the open shop. To some it looked as if the United States, alone among Western capitalist nations, would develop an industrial economy without independent labour unions. Many perceptive observers spoke of unionism as ‘a largely spent force’ or ‘having less and less impact on society’.1 The doyen of labour relations experts, William M. Leiserson, believed that the ‘labor problem’, which had dominated serious discussion of industrial society since the 1870s, had been essentially solved. ‘Scientific study of labor questions today’, he concluded, ‘is directed rather at understanding the nature of the relationship between employers, wage-earners, and the public, and finding the methods by which these labor relations may be organized, administered, and adjusted to the satisfaction of all concerned.’2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. F. R. Dulles and Melvyn Dubofsky, Labor in American (Arlington Heights: Harlan Davidson, 1984) p. 400.

    Google Scholar 

  2. William M. Leiserson, ‘Labor Relations’ in Papers of William M. Leiserson, Box 52, quoted in Christopher L. Tomlins, The State and the Unions: Labor Relations, Law and the Organized Labor Movement in America, 1880–1960 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985) p. xi.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dulles and Dubofsky, Labor in America, p. 341.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See, for example, David Brody, ‘Labor and the Great Depression: the interpretative prospects’, Labor History, XIII, 1972, pp. 231–44, and ‘Radical labor history and rank-and-file militancy’, Labor History, XVI, 1975, pp. 117–26. In these articles Brody surveys the field and literature, especially the work of Alice and Staughton Lynd, Stanley Aronowitz, Loran L. Cary, James R. Green, James Weinstein and others. See also Melvyn Dubofsky, ‘Not so “turbulent years”: another look at the American 1930s’, Amerikastudien, XXIV, pp. 5–20. For two book-length discussions, see

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Michael Goldfield, The Decline of Organized Labor in the United States (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987) and

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kim Moody, An Injury to All: The Decline of American Unions (New York: Verso, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alice Kessler-Harris, ‘A New Agenda for American Labor History’ in J. Carroll Moody and Alice Kessler-Harris eds., Perspectives on American Labor History: the Problems of Synthesis (De Kalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 1989), pp. 223–4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1991 Patrick Renshaw

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Renshaw, P. (1991). Conclusion. In: American Labour and Consensus Capitalism, 1935–1990. The Contemporary United States. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21605-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21605-5_8

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-42866-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-21605-5

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics