Skip to main content

Conclusion

  • Chapter
The Liberal Party

Part of the book series: British History in Perspective ((BHP))

  • 35 Accesses

Abstract

In politics all success is ephemeral. Parties may achieve electoral triumphs and fulfil some of their goals, but they satisfy transient needs and in time, having lost their raison d’être, they are replaced. Sometimes this is disguised by the accident of institutional survival. There is a party which calls itself a Conservative Party today, just as there was in the 1840s; but little connects the two organisations except the name and a few hazy historical memories. Nor would Keir Hardie and other Labour pioneers easily recognise any affinities with the political party which now bears the ‘Labour’ title. The once-mighty Liberal Party of Gladstone, Campbell-Bannerman, Asquith and Lloyd George served its turn before fading into insignificance. Does that make it any different from other political parties? What should be avoided is allowing our knowledge of eventual decline to distract attention from the very substantial achievements which the Party had earlier secured.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Cited in J. A. Thompson, ‘Historians and the Decline of the Liberal Party’, Albion, 22 (1990), p. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  2. When Duncan Tanner claims to be demonstrating the ‘viability’ of the Edwardian Liberal Party in the face of Labour’s ‘challenge’, he is sometimes doing nothing more than explaining why the Labour Party was never to be as effective a party as the Liberals whom it was supplanting (Tanner, D., Political Change and the Labour Party 1900–1918 [Cambridge, 1990]).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Cited in Glaser, J. F., ‘English Nonconformity and the Decline of Liberalism’, American Historical Review, 63 (1957–8), p. 361.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cowling, M. The Impact of Labour 1920–1924 (Cambridge, 1971), Chs 18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cited in Cook, C., The Age of Alignment: Electoral Politics in Britain, 1922–1929 (London, 1975), p. 183.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Samuel Storey, Newcastle Daily Chronicle, 12 January 1906, cited Purdue, A. W., ‘The Liberal and Labour Parties in North-East Politics, 1900–14: The Struggle for Supremacy’, International Review of Social History, 26 (1981), pp. 12–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Matthew, H. C. G., The Liberal Imperialists: the ideas and politics of a post-Gladstonian élite (Oxford, 1973), p. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bentley, M., ‘The Liberal Response to Socialism, 1918–29’, in Brown, K. D. (ed.), Essays in Anti-Labour History (London, 1974), p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Spender, S., Forward From Liberalism (London, 1937), esp. Chs 2–3 and p. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peter Clarke, ‘Liberals and Social Democrats in Historical Perspective’, in Bogdanor, V. (ed.), Liberal Party Politics (Oxford, 1983), pp. 39–42. Clarke’s thesis in 1983 was that, with the Labour Party apparently disintegrating, its ‘social democratic’ wing would finally abandon it and, within the ambit of the ‘Alliance’, reunite with the more ideologically compatible Liberals.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Balfour, M., Britain and Joseph Chamberlain (London, 1985), pp. 149–50.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Clarke, P. F., Lancashire and the New Liberalism (Cambridge, 1971), p. 394.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Hutchison, I. G. C., A Political History of Scotland 1832–1924 (Edinburgh, 1986), p. 312.

    Google Scholar 

  14. On this subject, see Hannah, L., The Rise of the Corporate Economy: The British Experience (London, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  15. James, R. R. (ed.), Memoirs of a Conservative: J. C. C. Davidson’s Memoirs and Papers 1910–37 (London, 1969), pp. 289–90.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pinto-Duschinsky, M., British Political Finance 1830–1980 (Washington, D.C., 1981), pp. 111–13.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Savage, M., The Dynamics of Working-Class Politics: the Labour Movement in Preston, 1880–1940 (Cambridge, 1987), p. 144.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See for example, MacDonald’s remarks at Southampton in 1894, on accepting the invitation to contest the borough as an independent Labour representative: ‘Our movement is neither a party nor a class movement, but a national one…’, in Marquand, D., Ramsay MacDonald (London, 1977), p. 37; this was a claim which he also liked to make in his later ‘theoretical’ defences of socialism.

    Google Scholar 

  19. McKibbin, R., The Ideologies of Class (Oxford, 1990), p. 281.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1992 G. R. Searle

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Searle, G.R. (1992). Conclusion. In: The Liberal Party. British History in Perspective. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22165-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22165-3_9

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-55916-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-22165-3

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics