Skip to main content
  • 36 Accesses

Abstract

In contrast to education, housing policy enjoyed little wartime consensus and remained throughout the postwar years at the heart of party conflict. During the war, admittedly, a white paper had been published on the related issue of land use; and after the mid-1950s the Labour Party endorsed the Conservatives’ earlier call for a ‘property-owning democracy’. However, the wartime coalition was unable eventually to agree upon the white paper’s proposals and the ownership of land, as Michael Foot has remarked, became ‘the rock’ upon which it was broken.1 Thereafter it was to remain a key election issue. So too were the management and finance, if not the principles, of the housing programme. In the 1951 and 1964 elections, for example, the Conservative and Labour Parties respectively used the promise to build 300 000 houses a year and the Rachman scandal over the terrorising of private tenants to discredit the ‘socialist’ and ‘free-market’ approaches to housing and thereby their opponents’ overall attitude towards the welfare state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further Reading

  • Two good general introductory books are J. R. Short, Housing in Britain: the postwar experience (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • and D. Donnison and C. Ungerson, Housing Policy (Harmondsworth, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • The latter is strong on international comparisons, as is M. Daunton, A Property-Owning Democracy? (1987) which also places postwar developments in historical perspective.

    Google Scholar 

  • Another excellent introduction, within an explicit Marxist framework, is S. Merrett, State Housing in Britain (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Although concerned mainly with the period after 1979, P. Malpass and A. Murie, Housing Policy and Practice (2nd ed., 1987) has a useful historical introduction and an even more useful bibliography.

    Google Scholar 

  • The definitive political history of planning is A. Cox, Adversary Politics and Land: the conflict over land and property in postwar Britain (Cambridge, 1984).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • This may be supplemented by G. Cherry, The Politics of Town Planning (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • and M. Aldridge, The British New Towns: a programme without a policy (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Three other classic works are: P. Dunleavy, The Politics of Mass Housing in Britain, 1945–75 (Oxford, 1981);

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Boddy, The Building Societies (1980); and on Rachman and rents in the 1960s,

    Google Scholar 

  • K. G. Banting, Poverty, Politics and Policy (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • The complexities of policy can be enlivened by the exploits of three particularly charismatic housing ministers recorded, respectively, in M. Foot, Aneurin Bevan (vol. 2, 1975),

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Macmillan, Tides of Fortune, 1945–1955 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • and R. H. S. Crossman, Diaries of a Cabinet Minister (vol. 1, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1993 Rodney Lowe

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lowe, R. (1993). Housing. In: The Welfare State in Britain since 1945. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22549-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics