Skip to main content
  • 17 Accesses

Abstract

The decision to introduce an internal market based on the division between the purchaser and provider of health care brought into sharp focus the key political problem of the NHS: that the demand for health care will always exceed the supply, that a rationing mechanism is therefore required to resolve the difference between the two, but that the explicit rationing of resources is unacceptable to the health care rights embodied in the concept of British citizenship. In the past the resolution of this conundrum was achieved covertly: rationing took place, but it was in no-one’s interest to advertise the fact. What the reforms have achieved is the creation of a role, that of the purchasing agent, which takes clear and unequivocal responsibility for the allocation of resources, which must, given excess demand, make overt choices about the rationing of scarce resources and which will, inevitably, conflict with the universalistic values of the welfare state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 1998 Brian Salter

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Salter, B. (1998). Purchasing. In: The Politics of Change in the Health Service. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26224-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26224-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-65641-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-26224-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics