Skip to main content

Media in Society: Purpose and Performance

  • Chapter
Media Communication
  • 91 Accesses

Abstract

The more prominently the media have featured in the life of a people the sharper has been the debate on what purposes the media ought to serve in society. In the 19th century the press were sufficiently influential to earn the title Fourth Estate, a part of the power structure alongside government, the church and the law. This chapter attempts a survey of a number of definitions of the purpose and role of the media, starting with three broad models of media function — propagandist, commercial laissez-faire and public service. The shift from public to private, aided and abetted by imperatives brought about by new technology, is sketched in to remind us of the rapidity of change and the volatility of definitions. Then six normative theories arising out of specific cultural/political contexts are discussed. A core feature common to all media, their relationship with centres of political and economic power, leads us to examine the part media play in reality-definition and as agents of social control. Ultimately how the media are constituted — as private or public enterprises — governs how they perform and what principles inspire practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For an analysis of Silvio Berlusconi’s impact on broadcasting in Italy, see Paul Statham’s article ‘Television news and the public sphere in Italy: conflicts at the media/politics interface’ in European Journal of Communication, December 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Henry Porter, ‘The keeper of the global gate’, Guardian 29 October 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Denis McQuail, Mass Communication Theory: An Introduction (UK: Sage, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  4. John Hartley, The Politics of Pictures: The Creation of the Public in the Age of Popular Media (UK: Routledge, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Richard V Ericson, Patricia M. Barnak and Janet B.L. Chan, Representing Order: Crime, Law and Justice in the News Media (UK: Open University Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky, Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media (US: Pantheon, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Herbert J. Gans, ‘Reopening the black box: toward a limited effects theory’ in Journal of Communication, Autumn 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D.R. LeDuc, ‘Deregulation and the dream of diversity’ in Journal of Communication, 32(4) (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harold Innes. See The Bias of Communication (Canada: Toronto Press, 1951) and Concepts of Time (Canada: Toronto Press, 1952).

    Google Scholar 

  10. John Fiske, Reading the Popular (US: Unwin Hyman, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.H. Boyer, ‘How editors view objectivity’ in Journalism Quarterly, 58 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Denis McQuail, Media Performance: Mass Communication and the Public Interest (UK: Sage, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  13. McQuail, ‘Mass media in the public interest’ in James Curran and Michael Gurevitch (eds), Mass Media and Society (UK: Edward Arnold, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  14. John Keane, ‘The crisis of the sovereign state’ in Marc Raboy and Bernard Dagenais (eds) Media, Crisis and Democracy: Mass Communication and the Disruption of Social Order (UK: Sage, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nick Stevenson, Understanding Media Cultures: Social Theory and Mass Communication (UK: Sage, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1998 James Watson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Watson, J. (1998). Media in Society: Purpose and Performance. In: Media Communication. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26546-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics