Skip to main content

Part of the book series: British History in Perspective ((BHP))

Abstract

Æthelred II (978–1016) has been saddled with the worst reputation of all the Old English kings. His pejorative nickname, unræd (‘ill-counselled’) is recorded only from the thirteenth century, but his reign has been seen as a time of disaster, exacerbated by bad advice, vacillation, treachery and cowardice. His most recent biographer has done much to salvage his good name, but still with the proviso that he was ‘a poor judge of men’.2

When a child is king and a ceorl bishop and a slave ealdorman, it’s bad news for the people.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Simon Keynes, ‘A Tale of Two Kings: Alfred the Great and Æthelred the Unready’, TRHS 5th series, 36 (1986), 213.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A rather pessimistic view of lay literacy appears in Patrick Wormald, ‘The Uses of Literacy in Anglo-Saxon England’, TRHS 5th series, 27 (1977), 95–114

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. 1515 (see Chapter 7, note 73 above); S. 939 (see note 27 above). For this and later references to documents stored in the king’s haligdom, see Simon Keynes, ‘Regenbald the Chancellor (sic)’, ANS, 10 (1987) 190.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Keynes, ‘A Tale of Two Kings’, pp. 205–6; P. H. Sawyer, ‘The Two Viking Ages of Britain’, Medieval Scandinavia, 2 (1969), 163–76.

    Google Scholar 

  5. John Gillingham, ‘“The Most Precious Jewel in the English Crown”: Levels of Danegeld and Heregeld in the Early Eleventh Century’, EHR, 104 (1989), 373–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. K. Lawson, ‘The Collection of Danegeld and Heregeld in the Reigns of Æthelred II and Cnut’, EHR, 99 (1984), 721–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. For post-Conquest ‘danegeld’, see Judith Green, ‘The Last Century of Danegeld’, EHR, 96 (1981), 241–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Robertson, Anglo-Saxon Charters, no.72, pp. 144–5; Pamela Taylor, ‘The Endowment and Military Obligations of the See of London: a Re-assessment of Three Sources’, ANS, 14 (1992), 292–99.

    Google Scholar 

  9. ASC, 1010 draws the same distinction between the faithful men, who fight and die, and the cowards, who save themselves by flight, as does The Battle of Maldon. See also Ann Williams, ‘The Battle of Maldon and “The Battle of Maldon”: History, Poetry and Propaganda’, Medieval History, 2 (1992), 38–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1999 Ann Williams

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williams, A. (1999). The Ill-Counselled King. In: Kingship and Government in Pre-Conquest England c.500–1066. British History in Perspective. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27454-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27454-3_9

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-56798-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-27454-3

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics