Skip to main content

Abstract

The physician treating the child who is suffering from a potentially lethal illness must deal not only with the disease itself but also with the emotional reactions of the child and his family to the illness. Research indicates that families with a dying child constitute a high-risk group. The severe stress precipitated by a fatal illness may generate a broad variety of problems, ranging from jealousies and unresolved grief reactions in siblings to separation, divorce, or mental illness in parents.4, 5, 9, 17

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Recommended For Further Reading

  1. ANTHONY, E. J., and KOUPERNIK, C., eds. The Child in His Family. Vol. 2: The Impact of Death and Disease. New York, Wiley and Sons, 1973. —a highly recommended collection of papers dealing with problems and reactions of children and parents to disease, death, and mourning.

    Google Scholar 

  2. BARTON, D. “Teaching Psychiatry in the Context of Death and Dying”. Amer. J. Psychiat. 130: 1290–91, 1973. —discusses the interpersonal and socio-cultural dimensions of death as well as ethical considerations and individual responses.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. BERNSTEIN, D. M. “After Transplantation—The Child’s Emotional Reactions”. Amer. J. Psychiat. 127: 1189–93, 1970–71. —in this study it was found that anxiety about fear of death was often aroused whether or not there were signs of kidney rejection. Urges the psychiatrist, surgeon, and nephrologist to be alert and compassionate in dealing with the emotional problems which often arise in child transplant patients.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. BINGER, C. M.; ALBIN, A. R.; FEVERSTEIN, R. C.; KUSHNER, J. H.; ZOGER, S.; and MIKKELSEN, C. “Childhood Leukemia—Emotional Impact on Patient and Family”. New Eng. J. Med. 280: 414–18, 1969. —good for the medical reader.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. BOZEMAN, M. F.; ORBACH, C. E.; and SUTHERLAND, A. M. “Psychological Impact of Cancer and Its Treatment (III); The Adaption of Mothers to the Threatened Loss of their Children through Leukemia (II)”. Cancer. 8: 1–33, 1955. —describes parental reactions to diagnosis of acute leukemia in their young children, including shock, denial, anxiety, guilt, depression. Hostility to doctors and inability to comprehend information given are common reactions to the crisis precipitated by the illness and the ability of the physician to establish and maintain a supportive relationship with the parents may be crucial. An excellent discussion of the difficulties faced by hospital staff.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. EASSON, W. M. “Care of the Young Patient Who Is Dying”. J. Amer. Med. Assoc. 205: 203–7, 1968. —reactions vary with age; clinical management must reflect this.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. FEIFEL, M., and HANSON, S. “Physicians Consider Death”. Proceedings of Seventh Annual Convention, American Psychological Association, 201, 1967. —physicians frequently have particular problems with death.

    Google Scholar 

  8. FEIFEL, M. “Death”, in Farberow, M. L., ed., Taboo Topics, pp. 8–21. New York, Atherton Press, 1963. —it’s time death was no longer taboo!

    Google Scholar 

  9. FRIEDMAN, S. B. “Care of the Family of the Child with Cancer”. Pediat. 40: 498–507, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  10. HOROWITZ, L. “Treatment of the Family with a Dying Member”. Fam. Proc. 14: 95–106, 1975. —focuses on the uses of transference and counter-transference in the treatment of families with a dying member.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. KAPLAN, D. M.; SMITH, A.; GROBSTEIN, R.; and FISCHMAN, S. E. “Family Mediation of Stress”. Soc. Work. 18: 60–69, July 1973. —deals with the impact of stress on the whole family.

    Google Scholar 

  12. KLIMAN, G. Psychological Emergencies of Childhood. New York, Grune and Stratton, 1968. —excellent little book emphasizing the need to move towards an approach that can prevent the development of psychological emergencies.

    Google Scholar 

  13. KOOCHER, G. P. “Talking with Children about Death”. Amer. J. Orthopsychiat. 44: 404–11, 1974. —after describing responses of seventy-five children, ages six to fifteen, to questions about death, offers suggestions for discussing death with a child who has suffered a loss.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. KUBLER-ROSS, E. On Death and Dying. Toronto, Collier-Macmillan, 1967. —classic book—should be read by all medical and nursing students, and all who deal with seriously ill children and their families.

    Google Scholar 

  15. LANSKY, S. B. “Childhood Leukemia: The Child Psychiatrist as a Member of the Oncology Team”. J. Amer. Acad. Child Psychiat. 13: 499–508, 1974. —preliminary report of an ongoing study of the leukemic child and his family. Discusses the impact of prolonged anticipation of death on child and family recommending that a child psychiatrist be part of the treatment plan.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. LURIE, M. J., and GALLAGHER, J. M. “Innovative Techniques for Teaching Psychiatric Principles to General Practitioners”. J. Amer. Med. Assoc. 221: 696–99, 1972. —illustrates the need to remain “involved” to learn, although learning may be painful.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. MARSTEIN, B. “The Effects of Long-Term Illness of Children on the Emotional Adjustment of Parents”. Child Devel. 31: 151–71, 1960. —emphasizes that disease produces “other” diseases.

    Google Scholar 

  18. PAKES, E. H. “Child Psychiatry and Pediatric Practice; How Disciplines Work Together”. Ont. Med. Rev. 41: 69–71, Feb. 1974. —deals with the important bridge between child psychiatry and paediatrics. The new physician should bridge that gap!

    Google Scholar 

  19. SCHOWALTER, J. E.; FERHOLT, J. B.; and MANN, N. M. “The Adolescent Patient’s Decision to Die”. Pediat. 51: 97–103, 1973. —compassionate definitive discussion of the problems faced by the medical team caring for an adolescent patient who chooses to die.

    Google Scholar 

  20. SOLNIT, A. J., and GREEN, M. “Psychologic Considerations in the Management of Deaths on Pediatric Hospital Services: The Doctor and the Child’s Family”. Pediat. 24: 106–12, 1959. —sound advice regarding the management of the family of the child who dies.

    Google Scholar 

  21. TOOLEY, K. “The Choice of a Surviving Sibling as ‘Scapegoat’ in Some Cases of Maternal Bereavement—A Case Report”. J. Child Psychol. Psychiat. 16: 331–39, 1975. —describes a pathological variation of the mourning process in mothers who suffer the psychologically damaging loss of a child whereby a surviving sibling is chosen as a scapegoat for their guilt and self-hatred. Suggests that counselling at the time of bereavement would help prevent this scapegoating. Interesting case report and analysis.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Additional Reading

  1. RICHMOND, J. B., and WAISMAN, H. A. “Psychologic Aspects of Management of Children with Malignant Diseases”. Amer. J. Dis. Child. 89: 42–47, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  2. ROTHENBERG, M. B. “Reactions of Those Who Treat Children with Cancer”. Pediat. 40: 507–10, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  3. SCHOWALTER, J. E. “Death and the Pediatric House Officer”. J. Pediat. 76, 5: 706–10, 1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. WEINER, J. M. “Attitudes of Pediatricians Toward the Care of Fatally III Children”. J. Pediat. 76: 700–705, 1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1977 Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pakes, E. (1977). The Dying Child and His Family. In: Steinhauer, P.D., Rae-Grant, Q. (eds) Psychological Problems of the Child and His Family. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-81464-0_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics