Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 30))

  • 1068 Accesses

Considerable controversy has accompanied the emergence of human genetics and its offshoot, behaviour genetics, over recent decades. The tendency in some quarters to engage a form of genetic reductionism—i.e., attributing human behaviour mainly or entirely to genetic ‘‘make-up,’’ ‘‘markers,’’ ‘‘triggers,’’ or ‘‘traits’’—has raised concerns over the possible implications of this way of thinking about human affairs. Violence, aggression, impulsivity, and hyperactivity have been linked variously to genetic factors. While few if any geneticists would be brazen or foolhardy enough to talk about a ‘‘crime gene,’’ it has nonetheless become clear that certain genetic markers have been linked with certain problematic and aberrant conduct—markers that may be screened for in a future, arguably dystopian society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Worster, D. 1994. Nature’s Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 406. Also Hindmarsh, R. and Lawrence, G. 2004. Recoding nature: deciphering the script. In: Hindmarsh, R. and Lawrence, G. (eds.), Recoding Nature: Critical Perspectives on Genetic Engineering. Sydney: UNSW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lombroso, C. 1913. Crime: Its Causes and Remedies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cited in Roach Anlue, S. 1996. Deviance, Conformity and Control. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibid., 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid., 17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor, I., Walton, P., and Young, J. 1973. The New Criminology: For a Social Theory of Deviance. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 39

    Google Scholar 

  7. Garland, D. 1997. Of crime and criminals: the development of criminology in Britain. In: Maguire, M., Morgan, R., and Reiner, R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rafter, N. 1992. Criminal anthropology in the United States. Criminology 30 (4): 525–545, 526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kevles, D. 1985. In the Name of Eugenics. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Taylor et al. ibid., 37.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kevles, ibid., 5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ellis, H. 1901. Cited in Kevles, ibid., 56.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cited in Kevles, ibid., 112.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sheldon, W. 1949. Varieties of Delinquent Youth. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Glueck, S. and Glueck, E. 1950. Unravelling Juvenile Delinquency. New York: Harper & Row; Eysenck, H. 1989. Crime and Personality. London: Paladin.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Eysenck, ibid., 41.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fischer, E. 1997. The archetypal gene: the open history of a successful concept. In: Wirz, J. and Lammerts van Bueren, E. (eds.), The future of DNA. Proceedings of an International Conference about Presuppositions in Science and Expectations in Society, 2–5 October 1996, Goetheanum, Dornach, Switzerland: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 35.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jacobs, P., Brunton, M., Melville, M., Brittain, R., and McClermont, W. 1965. Aggressive behaviour, mental subnormality and the XYY male. Nature 208: 1351–1352.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Price, W. 1966. Criminal patients with XYY sex chromosome complement. The Lancet 1: 35.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Morgan, P. 1978. Delinquent Fantasies. London: Temple Smith, 343.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See Taylor et al., ibid.,, 45–56; Roach, ibid., 14.

    Google Scholar 

  23. See Higgins, E. 1997. Study links men’s bad behaviour to what’s in their genes. The Weekend Australian, 14 June.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mechnick, S. 1977. A bio-social theory of the learning of law abiding behaviour. In: Samoff, A., Mechnik, S., and Christensen, O. (eds.), Biosocial Bases of Criminal Behaviour. New York: Gaizner; see also Mechnick, S., Muffit, T., and Stack, S. (eds.). 1987. The Causes of Crime: New Biological Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ackers, R. 1994. Criminological Theories: Introduction and Evolution. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury, 80–81.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ibid., 81.

    Google Scholar 

  27. For a general review, see Ellis, L. 1985. Genetics and criminal behaviour: evidence through the end of the 1970s. In: Marsh, F. and Katz, J. (eds.), Biology, Crime and Ethics: A Study of Biological Explanations for Criminal Behaviour. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing, 69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ibid., 81.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ibid., 82–83.

    Google Scholar 

  30. See Breuer, G. 1982. Sociobiology and the Human Dimension. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Hinde, R. 1987. Individuals, Relationships and Culture: Links Between Ethnology and the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Alcock, J. 2001. The Triumph of Socio-Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. See Midgley, M. 2003. The Myths We Live By. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fishbein, D. 1990. Biological perspectives in criminology. Criminology 28: 27–72, 42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Brunner, H. 1993. Abnormal behaviour associated with a point mutation in the structural gene for monoamine oxidase A. Science 262: 578–580; Booth, A. and Osgood, W. 1993. The influence of testosterone on deviance in adulthood. Criminology 31 (1): 93–117;.Van den Oord, E. 1994. A study of problem behaviourism 10- to 15-year-old biologically related and unrelated international adoptees. Behaviour Genetics 24 (3); Cook, E. 1995. Association with attention deficit disorder and the dopamine gene. American Journal of Human Genetics 56: 993–998; Cloninger, C., Adolfsson, R., and Svrakic, N. 1996. Mapping genes for human personality. Nature Genetics 12 (1): 3–4; McGuffin, P. and Thapar, A. 1997. Genetic basis of bad behaviour in adolescents. The Lancet 350 (9081): 885; Demott, K. 1995. Personality disorders may be genetic. Clinical Psychiatry News 27 (12): 27; Hudziak, J., Rudiger, L., Neale, M., Heath, A., and Todd, R. 2000. A twin study of inattentive, aggressive, and anxious/depressed behaviors. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 39: 469–476. See also Taylor, L. 1984. Born to Crime: The Genetic Causes of Criminal Behaviour. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press; Gunn, J. and Farrington, D. (eds.). 1985. Aggression and Dangerousness. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Atkinson, I., Robinson, J., and Shute, R. 1997. Between a rock and a hard place: an Australian perspective on education of children with ADHD. Education and Clinical Psychology 14 (1): 21–30, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jacobs, B. 2002. Queensland Children at Risk: The Over Diagnosis of ‘‘ADHD’’ and the Overuse of Stimulant Medication. Brisbane: Youth Affairs Network Queensland, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sprich, S., Biedenman, M., Crawford, H., Mundy, E., and Faraone, S. 2000. Adoptive and biological families of children and adolescents with ADHD. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 39 (11): 1432–1437.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ibid., 1435.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Galton, D. 2002. Eugenics: The Future of Human Life in the 21st Century. London: Abacus, 155.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Midgley, ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  41. See Love, R. 2004. Deleting sadness? clones and designer babies. In: Hindmarsh, R. and Lawrence, G. (eds.), Recoding Nature: Critical Perspectives on Genetic Engineering. Sydney: UNSW Press; see also Rowland, R. 2001. The quality-control of human life: masculine science & genetic engineering. In: Hindmarsh, R. and Lawrence, G. (eds.), Altered Genes II: The Future? Melbourne: Scribe.

    Google Scholar 

  42. See Pigem, J. 2002. Barcoding life. New Internationalist 349 (September); Gray, C. 2002. Cyborg Citizen. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Suzuki, D. and Levine, D. 1994. Cracking the Code: Redesigning the Living World. Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 222.

    Google Scholar 

  44. See Gene Watch UK. 2001. Human bio-collections: who benefits from gen-banking. Gene Watch UK Briefing, 14(April):4.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ibid., 2.

    Google Scholar 

  46. For the coinage of the term ‘‘bio-utopia’’ and discussion, see Hindmarsh, R. 2007. Genetic Manoeuvres, Bio-utopian Visions: A New Politics of Life. Perth: UWA Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hil, R., Hindmarsh, R. (2006). Body Talk: Genetic Screening as a Device of Crime Regulation. In: Betta, M. (eds) The Moral, Social, and Commercial Imperatives of Genetic Testing and Screening. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 30. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4619-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics