Skip to main content

Accountability and Career Technical Education (CTE) Policy: A Brief Review of Six States of the United States

  • Chapter
International Handbook of Education for the Changing World of Work

Accountability concerns are at the top of the list of issues that career technical education (CTE) administrators are currently forced to deal with. As it has evolved in the United States, state CTE policy is trying to juggle missions that include preparation for careers with current efforts to improve the academic achievement of youth. This focuses attention at the state level on the articulation of public policies that ‘thread the needle’—allowing students to master both occupational content and academic skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Association for Career and Technical Education. 2005. Side-by-side comparison of House and Senate bills with 1998 Perkins Law. Washington, DC: ACTE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association for Career and Technical Education. 2006. Reinventing the American high school for the 21st century: a position paper. Washington, DC: ACTE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J.H.; Mane, F. 1998. The New York state reform strategy: raising the bar above minimum competency. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottoms, G.; Young, M. 2005. High schools that work. Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Education Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, F.C. 2003. Policy studies for educational leaders: an introduction, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb, W.N. et al. 1999. Toward order from chaos: state efforts to reform workforce development system. Berkeley, CA: University of California, National Center for Research in Vocational Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L.M. 2003. Overview of public elementary and secondary schools and districts: school year 2001–02. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (No. NCES 2003-411.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp, M. et al. 2004. State dual enrollment policies: addressing access and quality. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kister, J. 2001. State leadership for career technical education. Washington, DC: The National Association of State Directors of Career Technical Education Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S. 2001. Financing vocational education: a state policy-makers’ guide. Berkeley, CA: MPR Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, C. 2004. Career and technical education: a briefing memo. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Assessment of Vocational Education. 2004. Final report to Congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Under-Secretary.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of State Boards of Education. 1998. Public accountability for student success: standards for education accountability systems. Alexandria, VA: NASBE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahn, M.L.; O’Driscoll, P.; Hudecki, P. 1999. Taking off! Sharing state-level accountability strategies: using academic and vocational accountability strategies to improve student achievement. Berkeley, CA: National Center for Research in Vocational Education. (No. MDS-1206.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverberg, M. et al. 2004. National assessment of vocational education: final report to Congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Under-Secretary, Policy and Program Studies Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stasz, C.; Bodilly, S. 2004. Efforts to improve the quality of vocational education in secondary schools: impact of federal and state policies. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stecher, B.M.; Hanser, L.M. 1992. Local accountability in vocational education: a theoretical model and its limitations in practice. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Editors. 2004. Quality counts 2004: Count me in. Education week, January 8, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. et al. 2004. The structures and challenges of vocational education funding and accountability systems: a report prepared by the academy for educational development for the national assessment of vocational education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Under-Secretary.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hawley, J.D., de Montrichard, A. (2009). Accountability and Career Technical Education (CTE) Policy: A Brief Review of Six States of the United States. In: Maclean, R., Wilson, D. (eds) International Handbook of Education for the Changing World of Work. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5281-1_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics