In this paper I will discuss another case of dependency between the aspectual properties of the predicate and the case marking of its nominal argument. The case to be discussed below is interesting and rather unusual since, unlike the cases of Partitive marking mentioned above, which are not restricted to just one particular verb, but, on the contrary, show quite a broad (but by no means unrestricted) distribution, the Polish case concerns exclusively negated (existential-)locative constructions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aljović, N. (2000). Unaccusativity and aspect in SerBoCroatian. Proceedings of CONSOLE 8. Ed. by C. Czinglar, K. Köhler, E. Thrift, E.J. van der Torre, and M. Zimmermann. Leiden: SOLE, 1-15.
Arad, M. (1998). Are unaccusatives aspectually characterized? MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 32, 1-21.
Babyonyshev, M. (1996). Structural Connections in Syntax and Processing: Studies in Russian and Japanese. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.
Bach, E. (1981). On time, tense and aspect: An essay in English metaphysics. Radical Pragmatics. Ed. by P. Cole. New York: Academic Press, 63-81.
Bennis, H. (2004). Unergative adjectives and psych verbs. The Unaccusativity Puzzle: Explorations of the Syntax-Lexicon Interface. Ed. by A. Alexiadou, E. Anagnostopoulou and M. Everaert. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 84-113.
Błaszczak, J. (2001). Investigation into the Interaction between the Indefinites and Negation. Berlin: Akademie Verlag [Studia grammatica 51].
Błaszczak, J. (2004). Some notes on aspect, (un)ergativity, and “X was not at Y”-constructions in Polish. Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Ottawa Meeting 2003. Ed. by O. Arnaudova, W. Browne, M.L. Rivero and D. Stojanovic. Ann Arbor (MI): Michigan Slavic Publications, 37-57.
Błaszczak, J. (2005). Two BEs or not two BEs? Beiträge der Europäischen Slavistischen Linguistik (POLYSLAV) 8. Ed. by M. Bayer, M. Betsch and R. Zimny. München: Sagner, 25-34.
Borik, O. (2002). Aspect and Reference Time. Ph.D. Dissertation, Utrecht University.
Borschev, V. and B. Partee (2001). The Russian genitive of negation in existential sentences: the role of theme-rheme structures reconsidered. Ms. Travaux de Cercle Linguistique de Prague (novelle série) [Working Papers of the Prague Linguistic Circle (new series)], v. 4. Ed. by E. Hajičova and P. Sgall. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Brinton, L.J. (1987). The aspectual nature of states and habits. Folia Linguistica (Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae) 21, 195-214.
Brown, S. (1996). The Syntax of Negation in Russian. Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University.
Brown, S. and S. Franks (1995). Asymmetries in the scope of Russian negation. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 3, 2, 239-287.
Cetnarowska, B. (2000). The unergative/unaccusative split and the derivation of resultative adjectives in Polish. Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Philadelphia Meeting 1999. Ed. by T.H. King and I. Sekerina. Ann Arbor (MI): Michigan Slavic Publications, 78-96.
Chomsky, N. (1998). Minimalist inquiries: the framework. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 15. [Published 2000 in Step by Step. Ed. by R. Martin, D. Michaels and J. Uriagereka.] Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 89-155.
Chomsky, N. (1999). Derivation by phase. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18. [Published 2001 in Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Ed. by M. Kenstowicz] Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 1-52.
Chvany, C. (1975). On the Syntax of BE-Sentences in Russian. Cambridge: Slavica.
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Reprinted 1995.]
den Dikken, M. (1995). Copulas. Manuscript, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam/HIL.
Dixon, R.M.W. (1994). Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dziwirek, K. (1994). Polish Subjects. New York/London: Garland Publishing.
Enç, M. (1991). The Semantics of Specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 22, 1-25.
Eriksen, P.K. (2000). On the semantics of the Russian copular verb byt’. Meddelelser Nr. 84, Slavisk-Baltisk Avdeling, Universitetet i Oslo.
Ferrell, J. (1953). On the aspect of byt’ and on the position of the periphrastic imperfective future in contemporary literary Russian. Word 9, 4, [Slavic Word 2], 362-376.
Filip, H. (1994). Aspect and the semantics of noun phrases. Tense and Aspect in Discourse. Ed. by C. Vet and C. Vetters. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 227-256.
Franks, S. (1995). Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Freeze, R. (1992). Existentials and other locatives. Language 68, 553-595.
Geist, L. (1999). Kopula byt’ (sein) eine funktionale und/oder eine lexikalische Kategorie? [Copula byt’ (BE) as a functional and/or lexical category?] ZAS Papers in Linguistics 14, 1-39.
Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument Structure. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
Harves, S. (2002). Unaccusative Syntax in Russian. Ph.D. Dissertation, Princeton University.
Heusinger, K. von and G. Kaiser (2003). The interaction of animacy, definiteness, and specificity in Spanish. Proceedings of the Workshop “Semantic and Syntactic Aspects of Specificity in Romance Languages”. Ed. by K. von Heusinger and G. Kaiser. Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Konstanz, 41-65. (Arbeitspapier Nr. 113.)
Hoekstra, T. and R. Mulder (1990). Unergatives as copular verbs: locational and existential predication. The Linguistic Review 7, 1-79.
de Hoop, H. and B. Narasimhan (this volume). Ergative case-marking in Hindi.
Junghanns, U. (1997). On byt’ (and byti). Formale Slavistik. Ed. by U. Junghanns and G. Zybatow. Frankfurt am Mnz.:Vervuert Verlag, 251-265.
Kayne, R. (1993). Towards a modular theory of auxiliary selection. Studia Linguistica 47, 3-31.
Kiparsky, P. (1998). Partitive case and aspect. The Projection of Arguments. Lexical and Compositional Factors. Ed. by M. Butt and W. Geuder. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 265-308.
Klebanowska, B. (1974). ‘Nie ma’, ‘nie było’, ‘nie będzie’. [‘There is not’, ‘There was not’, ‘There will not be’]. Prace Filologiczne [Philological Papers] XXV, 155-160.
Kondrashova, N. (1996). The Syntax of Existential Quantification. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin at Madison.
Kornfilt, J. (this volume). DOM and two types of DSM in Turkish.
Kratzer, A. (1994). The Event Argument and the Semantics of Voice. Manuscript, University of Massachusetts.
Kuryłowicz, J. (1964). The Inflectional Categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Winter.
Lakoff, G. (1966). Stative adjectives and verbs in English. Mathematical Linguistics and Automatic Translation, I-1-I-16. Report NSF-17. Ed. by A.G. Oettinger. Cambridge (MA): The Computational Laboratory, Harvard University.
Levin, B. and M. Rappaport Hovav (1995). Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
Mahajan, A. (1994). The ergativity parameter: Have-Be alternation, word order and split ergativity. Proceedings of NELS 24, 317-331.
Matushansky, O. (2001). The instrument of inversion: instrumental case in the Russian copula. Proceedings of WCCFL 19, 288-301.
Młynarczyk, A. (2004). Aspectual Pairing in Polish. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Utrecht.
Moro, A. (1997). The Raising of Predicates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Padučeva, E.V. (1992). O semantičeskom podxode k sintaksisu i genitivnom sub``ekte glagola BYT’. [On the semantic approach to syntax and the genitive subject of the verb BYT’ ‘BE’]. Russian Linguistics 16, 53-63.
Pereltsvaig, A. (2001). On the Nature of Intra-Clausal Relations: A Study of Copular Sentences in Russian and Italian. Ph.D. Dissertation, McGill University.
Piñón, C. (1994). Aspectual composition and the ‘pofective’ in Polish. Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The MIT Meeting 1993. Ed. by S. Avrutin, S. Franks and L. Progovac. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications, 341-373.
Przepiórkowski, A. (1999). Case Assignment and the Complement-Adjunct Dichotomy: A Constraint-Based Approach. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Tübingen.
Richardson, K. (2003). The Case for Meaningful Case: The Interaction of Case, Aspect, and Case in Russian. Ph.D. Dissertation, Harvard University.
Rozwadowska, B. (1992). Thematic Constraints on Selected Constructions in English and Polish. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
Rozwadowska, B. (1997). Towards a Unified Theory of Nominalizations. External and Internal Eventualities. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
Rozwadowska, B. (2003). Initial Boundary and Telicity in the Semantics of Perfectivity. Investigations into Formal Slavic Linguistics. (Contributions of the Fourth European Conference on Formal Description of Slavic Languages FDSL IV, held at Potsdam University, November 28-30, 2001). (Linguistik International 10). Ed. by P. Kosta, J. Błaszczak, J. Frasek, L. Geist and M. Żygis. Frankfurt am Mnz.: Peter Lang, 859-872.
Rozwadowska, B. and E. Willim (2004). The role of the accusative/partitive alternation in aspectual composition in Polish. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics (PSiCL) 39, 125-142. [Papers from the Syntax Session at the 34th Poznań Linguistic Meeting, ed. by P. Tajsner and J. Witkoś.]
Saloni, Z. and M. Świdziński (1985). Składnia współczesnego języka polskiego. [The Syntax of Contemporary Polish]. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
van Schooneveld, C.H. (1951). The aspect system of the Old Church Slavonic and Old Russian verbum finitum byti. Word 7, 2, 96-103.
Schoorlemmer, M. (1995). Participial Passive and Aspect in Russian. Ph.D. Dissertation, Utrecht University.
Smith, C.S. (1997). The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Swan, O.E. (2002). A Grammar of Contemporary Polish. Bloomington: Slavica.
Trask, R.L. (1979). On the Origins of Ergativity. Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations. Ed. by F. Plank. London: Academic Press, 385-404.
Vainikka, A. and J. Maling (1996). Is partitive case inherent or structural? Partitives: Studies on the Syntax and Semantics of Partitive and Related Constructions. Ed. by J. Hoeksema. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 179-208.
Witkoś, J. (1998). The Syntax of Clitics: Steps towards a Minimalist Account. Poznań: Motivex.
Witkoś, J. (2000). Nominative-to-genitive shift and the negative copula nie ma: implications for checking theory. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 8, 1-2, 295-327.
Wurmbrandt, S. (2004). Two types of restructuring - lexical vs. functional. Lingua 114, 991-1014.
Zamparelli, R. (1995). Layers in the Determiner Phrase. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Rochester.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blaszczak, J. (2009). Differential Subject Marking in Polish: The Case of Genitive vs. Nominative Subjects in “X was not at Y”-constructions. In: de Hoop, H., de Swart, P. (eds) Differential Subject Marking. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 72. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6497-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6497-5_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6498-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6497-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)