Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sustainable Development of Watersheds: Using Sturgeon Species as an Indicator in Integrated Transboundary Water Management in the Ural River Basin

  • Conference paper
Sustainable Use and Development of Watersheds

Part of the book series: NATO Science for Peace and Security Series ((NAPSC))

Abstract

River basins are the most appropriate geographical units for considering the management of water resources. At the same time rivers and their associated ecosystems and biodiversity provide the basis of life for a large portion of the world’s population. Though there is now an international consensus on the need for an integrated approach to sustainable river basin management, there is no standard definition of the term “sustainable” nor consensus on how to reach this state.

Sustainable development of watersheds should consider three main components: economic, social and environmental, which can hardly be reached in real-life watershed management. One of the problems is the selection of sustainable watershed management indicators.

Using sturgeon species as a natural indicator and an incentive for transboundary IWRM cooperation in the Ural river basin is suggested. The only free-flowing river in the Caspian basin, the Ural River, is a unique ecosystem with a preserved natural hydrological regime and the last sturgeon spawning habitats.

Activities towards successful integrated water management will not only work towards sustainable watershed management, but also secure preservation and restoration of sturgeon, this worldwide flagship species. Community-based management of sturgeon stocks also resolves social and economic problems by restoration of the traditional life style of local communities.

High economic and social values of sturgeon allow the combination of both ecological and socio-economic aspects of sustainable development. Investment in IWRM and sturgeon conservation can be largely repaid later by “sustainable extraction” of sturgeon.

The Ural River Basin Project, which aims at sustainable watershed management and sturgeon restoration, is described in this paper. Special attention is paid to integrated assessment and modelling of the Ural river ecosystem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anthony, J.A., Abdulrahman, S.A., et al. 2003. Integrated water resources management is more a political than a technical challenge. In Developments in water science. ed., 9-23. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspinall, R. and Pearson, D. 2000. Integrated geographical assessment of environmental condition in water catchments: Linking landscape ecology, environmental modelling and GIS. Journal of Environmental Management 59(4): 299-319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BBC. 2007. Russia’s Cossacks Rise Again. [on-line] BBC News. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6937562.stm [cited 10 November 2007].

  • Caviaremptor. 2004. Current Status of Beluga Sturgeon. Summary of Scientific Literature. [on-line] Caviaremptor. http://www.caviaremptor.org/current_status.html [cited April 2004].

  • Chaves, H.M.L. and Alipaz, S. 2007. An integrated indicator based on basin hydrology, envi-ronment, life, and policy: the watershed sustainability index. Water Resource Management 21: 883-895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CITES. 2003. Sturgeons of Romania and CITES. [on-line] Black Sea Sturgeon Management Action Group. 30/06/03. http://rosturgeons.danubedelta.org/ [cited 1 May 2004]. CITES. 2004. A Brief History of Sturgeons and CITES. [on-line] Steering Committee. Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. http://www.cites.org/eng/prog/Sturgeon/history.shtml [cited April 2004].

  • Cowx, I.G., Almeida, O., Bene, C, Brummett, R., Bush, S., Darwall, W, Pittock, J. and van Brakel, M. 2004. Value of river fisheries. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the Management of Large Rivers for Fisheries Sustaining Livelihoods and Biodiversity in the New Millennium, Bangkok, Thailand, FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulvy, N.K., Sadovy, Y., et al. 2003. Extinction vulnerability in marine populations. Fish Fisheries 4(1): 25-64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Union Water Framework Directive. 2000. European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. 2007. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2006. Rome: FAO Fisheries Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fohrer, N. 2005. Advances in sustainable river basin management. Ecological Modelling 187(1): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giupponi, C. 2007. Decision support systems for implementing the European water frame-work directive: the MULINO approach. Environmental Modelling & Software 22(2): 248-258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, G. 2002. Integrated assessment and modelling: an essential way of doing science. Environmental Modelling & Software 17(3): 201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, C., Malcolm, S.B., et al. 2000. A conceptual framework for integrating hydrological and bio-logical indicators into watershed management. Landscape and Urban Planning 49(1-2): 25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedelin, B. 2007. Criteria for the assessment of sustainable water management. Environmental Management 39 : 151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IUCN. 2007. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakeman, A.J. and Letcher, R.A. 2003. Integrated assessment and modelling: features, princi-ples and examples for catchment management. Environmental Modelling & Software 18(6): 491-501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansky, L., Pachova, N.I., et al. 2004. The Danube: a case study of sharing international waters. Global Environmental Change Part A 14(Supplement 1): 39-49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, W. and Goldsworthy, P. 1996. Multidisciplinary research for natural resource man-agement: conceptual and practical implications. Agricultural Systems 51(3): 259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jewitt, G. 2002. Can integrated water resources management sustain the provision of eco-system goods and services? Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 27(11-22): 887-895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonker, L. 2002. Integrated water resources management: theory, practice, cases. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 27(11-22): 719-720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson, B., Waples, R.S., et al. 1999. Extinction considerations for diadromous fishes. ICES Journal of Marine Science 56(4): 405-409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyl, F. and Wolff, M. 2007. Environmental variability and fisheries: what can models do? Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries. doi: 10.1007/s11160-007-9075-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kgarebe, B.V. 2002. Water resources management: the challenge of integration. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 27(11-22): 865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krysanova, V., Hattermann, F., et al. 2007. Implications of complexity and uncertainty for integrated modelling and impact assessment in river basins. Environmental Modelling & Software 22(5): 701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagutov, V. 2003. Modelling of radionuclides washout with surface water runoffs from radioac-tive waste storage site. Luxenburg, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagutov, V.V. 1996. Imitacionnoe modelirovanie zhiznennogo tsikla osetroviuh v bas-seine reki Don. [SImulation of Sturgeon Life Cycle in the Don River Basin]. M.Sc. thesis, Department of Applied Mathematics, South Russia State Technical University, Novocherkassk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagutov, V.V. 1997. Simulation Model as a Tool in Sustainable Water Management. M.Sc. thesis, Department of Environmental Sciences, Central European University, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagutov, Vladimir V. 1995. Mekhanizm unichtozheniya riubniuh zapasov Yuga Rossii i puti ih spaseniya [The mechanism of extermination of fish stocks in South Russia and possibilities of their restoration]. Novocherkassk, Donskaia Rech Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanini, S., Courtois, N., et al. 2004. Socio-hydrosystem modelling for integrated water-resources management-the Herault catchment case study, southern France. Environmental Modelling & Software 19(11): 1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larinier, M. 2000. Dams and fish migration. Toulouse, Institut de Mecanique des Fluides.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larocque, Guy R., Mauriello, Dave A., et al. 2006. Ecological models as decision tools in the 21st century: Proceedings of a conference organized by the International Society for Ecological Modelling (ISEM) in Quebec, Canada, August 22-24, 2004. Ecological Modelling 199(3): 217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letcher, R.A., Croke, B.F.W., et al. 2007. Integrated assessment modelling for water resource allocation and management: a generalised conceptual framework. Environmental Modelling & Software 22(5): 733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Guo, H., et al. 2007. An optimization method based on scenario analysis for water-shed management under uncertainty. Environmental Management 39: 678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mysiak, J., Giupponi, C., et al. 2005. Towards the development of a decision support system for water resource management. Environmental Modelling & Software 20(2): 203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, P., Letcher, R., et al. 2002. Progress in integrated assessment and modelling. Environmental Modelling & Software 17(3): 209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullar, D. and Springer, D. 2000. Towards integrating GIS and catchment models. Environmental Modelling & Software 15(5): 451-459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RAMSAR. 2002. Sustainable Management of Water Resources: The Need for a Holistic Ecosystem Approach Running out of Freshwater or Maintaining Freshwater through a Ecosystem Based Approach - An Easy Choice. 8th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties to the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971), The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, Valencia, Spain, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymakers, C. and Hoover, C. 2002. Acipenseriformes: CITES implementation from Range States to consumer countries. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 18(4-6): 629-638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Refsgaard, J.C., Nilsson, B., et al. 2005. Harmonised techniques and representative river basin data for assessment and use of uncertainty information in integrated water management (HarmoniRiB). Environmental Science & Policy 8(3): 267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RF. 2007. ВОДHЫЙ КОДЕКС РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ. (Water Code of the Russian Federation) 2007. Legal Information Consortium «Kodeks» (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoccimarro, M., Walker, A., et al. 1999. A framework for integrated catchment assessment in northern Thailand. Environmental Modelling & Software 14(6): 567-577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semple, E.C.. 1907. Geographical boundaries. II. Bulletin of the American Geographical Society 39(8): 449-463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sendzimir, J., Magnuszewski, P., et al. 2007. Anticipatory modeling of biocomplexity in the Tisza River Basin: First steps to establish a participatory adaptive framework. Environmental Modelling & Software 22(5): 599-609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, J., Parker, A., et al. 2005. A new approach for a Windows-based watershed modeling system based on a database-supporting architecture. Environmental Modelling & Software 20 (9): 1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, F.D.M., May, R.M., et al. 1993. How much do we know about the current extinction rate? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 8(10): 375-378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, T. and Wissel, C. 1999. The extinction risk of a population exploiting a resource. Ecological Modelling 115(2-3): 217-225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suter I.I. and Glenn W. 1999. Developing conceptual models for complex ecological risk assessments. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 5(2): 375-396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorsten, W., Eloy, R., et al. 2004. Dealing with uncertainty in spatially explicit population models. Biodiversity and Conservation 13(1): 53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TRAFFIC. 2003. Bleak Outlook for World Caviar Trade: North America Sturgeon, Paddlefish Stocks at Risk.[on-line]22 May 2003. http://www.traffic.org/news/press-releases/bleakoutlook.html [cited 2004 April 20].

  • Turnock, D. 2001. Cross-border conservation in East Central Europe: the Danube-Carpathian complex and the contribution of the World Wide Fund for Nature. GeoJournal 55(2-4): 655-681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNECE. 2003. Transboundary Water Cooperation in the newly independent States (NIS). Moscow-Geneva United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNECE. 2006. Preliminary assessment of the status of transboundary rivers discharging into the Caspian Sea and their major transboundary tributaries. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNECE. 2007. Transboundary accidental water pollution, liability and compensation: chal-lenges and opportunities. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Budapest. UNEP. 2004. Learning from Baia Mare. [on-line] The Environment Times. http://www.environmenttimes.net/article.cfm?pageID=112 [cited 10 December 2007].

  • Uralbas. 2007. Workshop Results. First International Ural Basin Workshop “Rescue of Sturgeon Species by means of Transboundary Integrated Water Management in the Ural River Basin”, Orenburg, Russia.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Delden, H., Luja, P., et al. 2007. Integration of multi-scale dynamic spatial models of socio-economic and physical processes for river basin management. Environmental Modelling & Software 22(2): 223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, Jean-Philippe, Moisan, Sabine, et al. 2007. River model calibration, from guidelines to oper-ational support tools. Environmental Modelling & Software (in press), Corrected Proof. 422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Harthausen, August. 1972. Studies on the interior of Russia. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • WWF. 2002a. Sturgeon 2020. Initiative for Providing Habitats for Sturgeons. Program descrip-tion and schedule, Budapest, WWF.

    Google Scholar 

  • WWF. 2002b. WWF Factsheet: Sturgeon. The materials of 12th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to CITES, Santiago, 3-15 November 2002,

    Google Scholar 

  • WWF. 2003. Global 200. Blueprint for a Living Planet. [on-line] World Wildlife Fund. http://www.panda.org/about_wwf/where_we_work/ecoregions/global200/pages/regions/region159.htm [cited April 2004].

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental Sciences & Policy Department, Central European University, Hungary

    Viktor Lagutov

Authors
  1. Viktor Lagutov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. IGEM Research and Consulting, Istanbul, Turkey

    İ. Ethem Gönenç

  2. Department of Systems Ecology and Sustainability, University of Bucharest, Romania

    Angheluta Vadineanu

  3. Chesapeake Bay Coordination Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Annapolis, MD, USA

    John P. Wolflin

  4. Georgia-Oklahoma Center for Research on the Environment, Athens, GA, USA

    Rosemarie C. Russo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B. V

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lagutov, V. (2008). Sustainable Development of Watersheds: Using Sturgeon Species as an Indicator in Integrated Transboundary Water Management in the Ural River Basin. In: Gönenç, İ.E., Vadineanu, A., Wolflin, J.P., Russo, R.C. (eds) Sustainable Use and Development of Watersheds. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8558-1_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation