Skip to main content
  • 1741 Accesses

Abstract

This paper address the impact of estimation bias on the use of traditional statistical tests in testing time series asset pricing models. Since we have no ideas about the true risk factors but only use some linear portfolios as their mimicking, these representatives themselves include noise term that will affect the estimation and result in the estimation biases. Due to the fact that traditional statistical tests have no power to check whether the significant correlation comes from useful risk information or useless noise information, they are not robust as the benchmarks for evaluating different asset pricing models. These results are shown in simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. W. Sharpe, “Capital asset Prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk,” J. Fin., vol.19, pp. 425-442, September 1964

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Lintner, “The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets,” R. Econ. Stat.,vol.47, pp. 13-37, March 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. M. Jensen, “The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945 – 1964,” J. Fin., vol. 23, pp. 389-416, May 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  4. I. Friend and M. Blume, “Measurement of portfolio performance under uncertainty,” Am. Econ. R., vol. 60, pp. 607-36, September 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R.F. Stambaugh, “On the exclusion of assets from tests of the two-parameter model: a sensitivity analysis,” J. Fin. Econ., vol. 10, pp. 237-268, November 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. Black, “Capital market equilibrium with restricted borrowing,” J. Bus., vol. 45, pp. 444-455, July 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Lakonishok, A. Shleifer and R.W. Vishny, “Contrarian investment, extrapolation, and risk,”J. Fin., vol. 49, pp. 1541-578, December 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E.F. Fama and K.R. French, “Size and book-to-market factors in earnings and returns,” J. Fin., vol. 50, pp. 131-155, March 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. W.F.M. DeBondt and R.H. Thaler, “Further evidence on investor overreaction and stock market seasonality,” J. Fin., vol. 42, pp. 557-81, July 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  10. K.D. Daniel and S. Titman, “Evidence on the characteristics of cross-Section variations in common stock returns,” J. Fin., vol. 52, pp. 1-33, March 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R.C. Merton, “An intertemporal capital asset pricing model,” Econ., vol. 41, pp. 867-887, September 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R.E. Lucas Jr. “Asset pricing in an exchange economy”, Econ.,,vol. 46, pp. 1429-1445, November 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.Y. Campbell and J.H. Cochrane, “By force of habit: a consumption-based explanation of aggregate stock market behavior,” J. Pol. Econ., vol. 107, pp. 205-251, April 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J.H. Cochrane, Asset Pricing. USA: Princeton University Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  15. E.F. Fama and K.R. French, “Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds,” J. Fin. Econ., vol. 33, pp. 3-56, February 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. E.F. Fama and K.R. French, “Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies,” J. Fin., vol. 51, pp. 55-84, March 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D.T. Breeden, M. R. Gibbons and R.H. Litzenberger, “Empirical test of the consumption-oriented CAPM,” J. Fin., vol. 44, pp. 231-262, June 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  18. N.F. Chen, R. Roll and S. A. Ross, “Economic forces and the stock market,” J. Bus. vol. 59, pp. 383-403, July 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  19. L.K.C. Chan, J. Karceski and J. Lakonishok, “On portfolio optimization: forecasting covariance and choosing the risk model,” R. Fin. Stud., vol. 12, pp. 937-74, November 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  20. E.F. Fama, “Determining the number of priced state variables in the ICAPM,” J. Fin. Quan. Anal.,vol. 33, pp. 217-231, June 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  21. O.A Lamont., “Economic tracking portfolios,” J. Econ. vol. 105, pp. 161-184, November 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  22. W. Ferson and C.R. Harvey, “The variation of economic risk premiums,” J. Pol. Econ., vol. 99, pp. 385-415, April 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  23. H. Working, “Note on the correlation of first differences of averages in a random chain,” Econ., vol. 28, pp. 916-918, October 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. Scholes and J. Williams, “Estimating betas from non-synchronous data,” J. Fin. Econ., vol. 5, pp. 309-327, December 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  25. M.E. Blume and R.E. Stambaugh, “Biases in computed returns: an application to size effect,” J. Fin. Econ., vol. 12, pp. 387-404, November 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Reinganum, “Misspecification of capital asset pricing: empirical anomalies based on earnings yields and market value,” J. Fin. Econ., vol. 9, pp. 9-46, March 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  27. H. Asgharian and B. Hansson “A critical investigation of the explanatory role of factor mimicking portfolios in multifactor asset pricing models,” App. Fin. Econ., vol. 17, pp. 835-847, August 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  28. J.H. Cochrane, “Financial markets and the real economy,” unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lin, H. (2008). Critique of Traditional Statistical Tests in Asset Pricing Models. In: Iskander, M. (eds) Innovative Techniques in Instruction Technology, E-learning, E-assessment, and Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8739-4_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8739-4_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8738-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8739-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics