Skip to main content
  • 2971 Accesses

Environmental data are often spatial in nature. In this chapter, we will examine image processing techniques which play a key role in artificial applications operating on spatial data. These AI applications often seek to extract information from the spatial data and use that information to aid decision makers.

Consider for example, land cover data. Since different locations have different types and amounts of forestry, land cover information has to be explicitly tied to geographic location. Such spatial data may be collected either through in-situ (in place) measurements or by remote sensing over large areas. An insitu measurement of land cover, for example, would involve visiting, observing and cataloging the type of land cover at a particular location. A remotely sensed measurement of land cover might be carried out from a satellite. The remotely-sensed measurement would cover a much larger area, but would be indirect (i.e., the land coverage would have to be inferred from the satellite channels) and would be gridded (i.e., one would get only one land cover value for one pixel of the satellite image). Users of land-cover data often wish to use the data to recover higher-level information such as determining what fraction of a particular country is wooded — AI applications help provide such an answer, building on well understood image processing methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Canny, J. (1986). A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 8(6), 679–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, L., & Jones, C. (2001). A satellite method to identify structural properties of mesoscale convective systems based on the Maximum Spatial Correlation Tracking Technique (MASCOTTE). Journal of Applied Meteorology 40(10), 1683–1701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressman, G. P. (1959). An operational objective analysis system. Monthly Weather Review 87367–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M., & Wiener, G. (1993). TITAN: Thunderstorm identification, tracking, analysis and nowcasting: A radar-based methodology. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 106

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. T., MacKeen, P. L., Witt, A., Mitchell, E. D., Stumpf, G. J., Eilts, M. D., et al. (1998). The Storm Cell Identification and Tracking (SCIT) algorithm: An enhanced WSR-88D algorithm. Weather and Forecasting 13263–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, S. E., DesJardins, M., & Kocin, P. J. (1983). An interactive Barnes objective map analysis scheme for use with satellite and conventional data. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology 221487–1503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakshmanan, V. (2000). Speeding up a large scale filter. Journal of Oceanic and Atmospheric Technology 17468–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakshmanan, V. (2004). A separable filter for directional smoothing. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 1192–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakshmanan, V., Rabin, R., & DeBrunner, V. (2003). Multiscale storm identification and forecast. Journal of Atmospheric Research367–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakshmanan, V., Fritz, A., Smith, T., Hondl, K., & Stumpf, G. J. (2007). An automated technique to quality control radar reflectivity data. Journal of Applied Meteorology 46288–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. A., & Webster, R. (1990). Kriging: A method of interpolation for geographical information system, Int'l. Journal of Geographical Information Systems 4(3), 313–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B., Zawadzki, I., & Germann, U. (2004). Predictability of precipitation from continental radar images. Part III: Operational nowcasting implementation (MAPLE). Journal of Applied Meteorology 43(2), 231–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuttle, J., & Gall, R. (1999). A single-radar technique for estimating the winds in tropical cyclones. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society80, 683–685

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, L., & Soille, P. (1991). Watersheds in digital spaces: An efficient algorithm based on immersion simulations. PAMI (13)6, 583–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfson, M., Forman, B. E., Hallowell, R. G., & Moore, M. P. (1999). The growth and decay storm tracker. Eighth Conference on Aviation (pp. 58–62). Dallas, TX: American Meteorological Society

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valliappa Lakshmanan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lakshmanan, V. (2009). Automated Analysis of Spatial Grids. In: Haupt, S.E., Pasini, A., Marzban, C. (eds) Artificial Intelligence Methods in the Environmental Sciences. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9119-3_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics