Skip to main content

Concepts of Participatory Decision-Making in Dutch Infrastructure Planning

  • Chapter
Public Participation and Better Environmental Decisions

Continued growth in traffic volume and infrastructure facilities such as airports, railroads, and highways can lead to a variety of environmental problems. Car traffic in particular consumes energy, produces congestion, causes accidents and pollution. Traffic is also a major generator of noise nuisance. Accordingly, a major challenge for infrastructure planning is to combine economic growth with an acceptable use of the available territory, nature, and biodiversity, and a restriction on environmentally harmful emissions.

In a small, densely populated, country, such as the Netherlands, these environmental problems often emerge as highly complex decision-making situations that feature conflicting interests. Consequently, Dutch infrastructure planners find it difficult to guarantee the participation of all these interests and deliver good quality and environmentally sound outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Altena, P. (1997). Infralab-project A12 Ede-Veenendaal {Infralab A12 project from Ede to Veenendaal}; paper presented at the regional planning conference ‘De aanpak van omgevings-planning’. Zwolle, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boelens, L. (1990). Stedebouw en planologie, een onvoltooid project: naar het communicatief handelen in de ruimtelijke planning en ontwerppraktijk {Urbanism and planning, an unfinished project; towards communicative action in spatial planning and design}. Delft, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, T. E. (1989). Direct democracy: The politics of initiative, referendum, and recall. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. (1982). Dilemmas of pluralist democracy: Autonomy vs. control. Yale studies in political sciences. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (Ed.) (1998). Deliberative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enthoven, G. (2005). Representatief en participatief: Een tuussenbalans na 10 jaar interactief besturen {Representative and participatory: A review on 10 Years of interactive governance}. Bestuurskunde, 2, 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasbergen, P. (Ed.) (1995). Managing environmental disputes, network management as an alternative. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks, F. & Tops, P. W. (2001). Politiek en interactief bestuur, Interacties en interpretaties rond de ontwikkeling van het Nationaal Verkeers — en Vervoersplan {Politics and interactive administration}. The Hague: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuvelhof, E. F. Ten & Termeer, C. J. A. M. (1991). Gebiedsgericht beleid en het bereiken van win-win situaties {Area orientated policy and reaching win-win situations}. Bestuurswetenschappen, 4, 301–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huigen, J., Frissen, P. H. A., & Tops, T. W. (1993). Het project Betuweroute, spoorlijn of bestuurli-jke co-productie {The Betuwe line project, railway or administrative coproduction}. Katholieke Universiteit Brabant, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J., Gruber, J., Neuman, M., & Thompson, R. (1994). Coordinating growth and environmental management through consensus building. California Policy Seminar Report. Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1967). The pragmatic method. In J. J. McDermott (Ed.), Writings of William James. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1984). Democracies: Patterns of majoritarian and consensus government in twenty-one countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mastop, J. M. (1987). Besluitvorming, handelen en normeren: Een methodologische studie naar aanleiding van het streekplanwerk {Decision-making, handling and standardising: A methodological study as a result of regional planning}. Planologische Studies, 4. Planologisch en Demografisch Instituut University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • RWS (1997). Open Keuken: Zoektocht naar methoden voor interactieve procesaanpak {Open kitchen: Zeeking methods for interactive project management}. The Hague, The Netherlands: National Head Office of Water Works, Infraplan.

    Google Scholar 

  • RWS NH (1995). Het open planproces, toepassing binnen projecten? {The open planning process, application within projects?}. Haarlem, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • RWS NH (1996). Spelregels voor het open planproces, uitgangspunten en implementatie {Rules of the game for the open planning process, starting points and implementation}. Haarlem, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, L. & Cruikshank, J. (1987). Consensual approaches to resolving public disputes. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teisman, G. R. (1992). Complexe Besluitvorming, een pluricentrisch perspectief op besluitvorm-ing over ruimtelijke investeringen {Complex decision-making, a pluricentric perspective on decision-making over spatial investments}. The Hague, The Netherlands: VUGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • V&W (1996). Open deuren — werkdocument {Open doors — working document}. The Hague, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • V&W (1997). Draagvlak en maatschappelijke acceptatie {Support and public acceptance}. Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • V&W (1998). Raamwerk integrale beleidsvorming hoofdinfrastructuur {A framework for integrated policy making regarding major infrastructure}. The Hague, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, N. (1996). Pragmatic rationality and planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 16, 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woltjer, J. (1998). Interactieve planvorming, inventarisatie en evaluatie van praktijk — initiatieven {Interactive plan making: An inventory and evaluation of practical initiatives}. TNO, Delft, The Netherlands: Opdrachtgever.

    Google Scholar 

  • WRR (1998). Ruimtelijke Ontwikkelingspolitiek {Spatial development policy}. The Hague, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johan Woltjer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Woltjer, J. (2009). Concepts of Participatory Decision-Making in Dutch Infrastructure Planning. In: Coenen, F.H.J.M. (eds) Public Participation and Better Environmental Decisions. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9325-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics