Skip to main content

Creativity, Intelligence, and Culture: Connections and Possibilities

  • Chapter
Milieus of Creativity

Part of the book series: Knowledge and Space ((KNAS,volume 2))

The topic of intelligence and culture is a widely studied and often highly controversial area, marked by much debate and emotion. Typically, African Americans and Hispanic Americans score lower than European Americans on a variety of measures of intelligence and ability (see Loehlin, 2000, for an overview). Group tests such as the SAT, ACT, Graduate Records Examinations, and Advanced Placement exams produce similar results (Camara & Schmidt, 1999; Morgan & Maneckshana, 1996). Some researchers argue that these measures reflect actual differences (e.g., Herrnstein & Murray, 1994; Jensen, 1998). Others point to the discrepancy between socioeconomic status and opportunities across ethnicities (Rogers, 1996; Sternberg, 1996), whereas still others argue that current ability measures do not incorporate enough aspects of intelligence (Sternberg et al., 2008).

Indeed, the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children—Second Edition (KABC-II; Kaufman & Kaufman, 2004) is based on two current theories of intelligence (the Cattell—Horn—Carroll (CHC) theory of intelligence (McGrew, 2005) and Luria's (1970) neuropsychological model). The KABC-II, as well as its predecessor (the K-ABC; Kaufman & Kaufman, 1983), has consistently shown the smallest differences in test scores by ethniCity of the major individual intelligence tests (Cole et al., 2009; Kaufman, 2003; Kaufman et al., 2005). Another instrument based on Luria's theory, the Cognitive Assessment System (Naglieri & Das, 1997), also shows small differences by ethniCity (Naglieri et al., 2005).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agars, M. D. & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Creativity in the workplace: Introduction to the special issue. Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving, 15, 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allik, J. & McCrae, R. R. (2004). Toward a geography of personality traits: Patterns of profiles across 36 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argulewicz, E. N. – Kush, J. C. (1984). Concurrent validity of the SRBCSS creativity scale for Anglo-American and Mexican-American gifted students. Educational and Psychological Research, 4, 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argulewicz, E. N., Elliott, S. N., & Hall, R. (1982). Comparison of behavioral ratings of Anglo-American and Mexican-American gifted children. Psychology in the Schools, 19, 469–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Averill, J. R., Chon, K. K., & Hahn, D. W. (2001). Emotions and creativity, East and West. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 4, 165–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J. & Kaufman, J. C. (2006). Creativity in English-speaking countries. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), International handbook of creativity (pp. 10–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, A. Y. (1985). Programs for the gifted and talented: Issues concerning minority populations. In F. Horowitz & M. O'Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 223–249). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, A. Y. (2001). Understanding the challenge of creativity among African Americans. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 12, 121–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, A. Y. (2003). Understanding the challenge of creativity among African Americans. Inquiry, 22, 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F. & Harrington, D. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benet-Martínez, V. & Oishi, S. (2008). Culture and personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 542–567). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camara, W. J. & Schmidt, A. E. (1999). Group differences in standardized testing and social stratification (College Board Rep. No. 99–5). New York: College Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadha, N. K. (1985). Creativity and cognitive style. Psycho Lingua, 15, 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Kasof, J., Himsel, A. J., Greenberger, E., Dong, Q., & Xue, G. (2002). Creativity in drawing geometric shapes: A cross-cultural examination with the consensual assessment technique. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 171–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. (1988). Growing up gifted (3rd ed.) Columbus, OH: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. C., Kaufman, J. C., & Dang, J. (2009, in press). Ethnic and gender invariance on the KABC-II: A multigroup structural validation for children 7–18 years. MInternational Journal of Testing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. V., Perara, J., & Fan, X. (1998). Children's drawing ability in the UK and China. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 41, 171–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. V. , Koyasu, M., Hiranuma, H., & Perara, J. (2001). Children's human figure drawings in the UK and Japan: The effects of age, sex and culture. British Journal of Development Psychology, 19, 275–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, S. E. & Markus, H. R. (1999). The cultural constitution of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 378–396). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, J. P., Naglieri, J. A., & Kirby, J. R. (1994). Assessment of cognitive process: The PASS theory of intelligence. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domino, G. (1974). Assessment of cinematographic creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 150–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs-Beauchamp, K. D., Karnes, M. B., & Johnson, L. J. (1993). Creativity and intelligence in preschoolers. Gifted Children Quarterly, 73, 113–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (1999). Personality and creativity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88, 407–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J. W. & Jackson, P. W. (1962). Creativity and intelligence: Explorations with gifted students. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, J. A. (1976). Comparative levels of creative ability in Black and White college students. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 128, 95–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R., Sweeney, D., Merenda, P. F., & Hughes, J. E., Jr. (1998). Demographic variables and personality: The effects of gender, age, education, and ethnic/racial status on self- descriptions of personality attributes. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 393–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, M. & McDermott, M. R. (1998). Exploring a tripartite relationship between rebelliousness, openness to experience and creativity. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 26, 347–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1988). Some changes in the structure-of-intellect model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harty, H., Adkins, D. M., & Sherwood, R. D. (1984). Predictability of giftedness identification indices for two recognized approaches to elementary school gifted education. Journal of Educational Research, 77, 337–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J. & Murray, C. (1994). The Bell Curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuchert, J. W. P., Parker, W. D., Stumpf, H., & Myburgh, C. P. H. (2000). The Five-Factor Model in South African college students. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 112–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. L. (1989). Cognitive diversity: A framework of learning. In P. L. Ackerman, R. J. Sternberg, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Learning and individual differences (pp. 61–116). New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. L. & Cattell, R. B. (1966). Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 57, 253–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. L. & Hofer, S. M. (1992). Major abilities and development in the adult period. In R. J. Sternberg & C. Berg (Eds.), Intellectual Development (pp. 44–99). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. L. & Noll, J. (1997). Human cognitive capabilities: Gf-Gc theory. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft & P. L Harrison (Eds.), Beyond traditional intellectual assessment: Contemporary and emerging theories, tests, and issues (pp. 53–91). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iscoe, I. & Pierce-Jones, J. (1964). Divergent thinking, age, and intelligence in white and Negro children. Child Development, 35, 785–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaquish, G. A. & Ripple, R. E. (1984). A life-span development cross-cultural study of divergent thinking abilities. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 20, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jellen, H. U. & Urban, K. (1989). Assessing creative potential worldwide: The first cross-cultural application of the Test for Creative Thinking-Drawing Production (TCT-DP). Gifted Educational International, 6, 78–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji, L., Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (2000). Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 943–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaltsounis, B. (1974). Race, socioeconomic status and creativity. Psychological Reports, 35, 164–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. S. & Kaufman, N. L. (1983). K-ABC interpretive manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. S. & Kaufman, N. L. (1993). Manual for Kaufman Adolescent & Adult Intelligence Test (KAIT). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. S. & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children—Second Edition (KABC-II) administration and scoring manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. S. & Lichtenberger, E. O. (2006). Assessing adult and adolescent intelligence (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C. (2003, August). Gender and ethnic differences on the KABC-II. In M. H. Daniel (Chair), The KABC-II: Theory, content, and administration. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C. (2006). Self-reported differences in creativity by gender and ethniCity. Journal of Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1065–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C. & Kaufman, S. B. (2008). Using intelligent testing to find creativity: Searching for divergent production in IQ tests (Unpublished manuscript).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., & Gentile, C. A. (2004). Differences in gender and ethniCity as measured by ratings of three writing tasks. Journal of Creative Behavior, 38, 56–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., Kaufman, A. S., Kaufman-Singer, J. L., & Kaufman, N. L. (2005). The Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children—Second Edition (KABC-II) and the Kaufman Adult and Adolescent Intelligence Test (KAIT). In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 344–370). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, C. & Quinn, M. E. (1987). Language minority children's linguistic and cognitive creativity. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 8, 173–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. H. (2005). Can only intelligent people be creative? A meta-analysis. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16, 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, L. A., McKee-Walker, L., & Broyles, S. J. (1996). Creativity and the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 189–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knox, B. J. & Glover, J. A. (1978). A note on preschool experience effects on achievement, readiness, and creativity. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 132, 151–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyllonen, P. C., Walters, A. M., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Noncognitive constructs and their assessment in graduate education. Educational Assessment, 10, 153–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. (1997). Creativity in horizontal and vertical domains. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 107–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, W. & Plucker, J. (2001). Creativity through a lens of social responsibility: Implicit theories of creativity with Korean samples. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 115–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loehlin, J. C. (2000). Group differences in intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 176–193). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1970). The functional organization of the brain. Scientific American, 222, 66–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly, J. J., Miller, S. W., Heaton, R. K., Byrd, D., Reilly, J., Velasquez, R. J., et al. (1998). The effect of Black acculturation on neuropsychological test performance in normal and HIV positive individuals. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 4, 291–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masten, W. G., Plata, M., Wenglar, K., & Thedford, J. (1999). Acculturation and Teacher Ratings of Hispanic and Anglo-American Students. Roeper Review, 22, 64–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–1265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrew, K. S. (2005). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities: Past, present, and future. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 136–181). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, B. M. (1988). HemispheriCity and creativity: A look at the relationships among elementary-age low-income Hispanic children. Educational Research Quarterly, 12, 2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, J. M. & Hogan, J. D. (1976). The influence of race and social-class level on the training of creative thinking and problem-solving abilities. Journal of Educational Research, 70, 91–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. & Maneckshana, B. (1996, April). The psychometric perspective: Lessons learned from 40 years of constructed response testing in the Advanced Placement Program. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education in New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J. A. & Das, J. P. (1997). Cognitive Assessment System. Chicago, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J. A. & Kaufman, J. C. (2001). PASS theory, intelligence, and giftedness. Roeper Review, 23, 151–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J. A., Rojahn, J. R., Aquilino, S. A., & Matto, H. C. (2005). Black European American differences in intelligence: A study of the planning, attention, simultaneous, and successive theory of intelligence. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 146–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic vs. analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niu, W.-H. & Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Cultural influences on artistic creativity and its evaluation. International Journal of Psychology, 36, 225–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noppe, L. D. (1985). The relationship of formal thought and cognitive styles to creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 19, 88–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palaniappan, A. K. (1996). A cross-cultural study of creative perceptions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82, 96–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J., Runco, M., & Lim, W. (2006). Predicting ideational behavior from divergent thinking and discretionary time on task. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pornrungroj, C. (1992). A comparison of creativity test scores between Thai children in a Thai culture and Thai-American children who were born and reared in an American culture. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Illinois State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preckel, F., Holling, H., & Weise, M. (2006). Relationship of intelligence and creativity in gifted and non-gifted students: An investigation of threshold theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price-Williams, D. R. & Ramirez III, M. (1977). Divergent thinking, cultural differences, and bilingualism. The Journal of Social Psychology, (ISSN-0022-4545) 103, 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R. (2000). Methods for detecting and evaluating cultural bias in neuropsychological tests. In E. Fletcher-Janzen, T. L. Strickland, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of cross- cultural neuropsychology (pp. 249–285). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C.R., Lowe, P.A., & Saenz, A.L. (1999). The problem of bias in psychological assessment. In C. R. Reynolds & T. B. Gutkin (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (pp. 549–596). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripple, R. E. & Jaquish, G. A. (1982). Developmental aspects of ideational fluency, flexibility, and originality: South Africa and the United States. South African Journal of Psychology, 12, 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, K. B. (1996). What The Bell Curve says and doesn't say: Is a balanced view possible? Roeper Review, 18, 252–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostan, S. M., Pariser, D., & Gruber, H. E. (2002). A cross-cultural study of the development of artistic talent, creativity, and giftedness. High Ability Studies, 13, 125–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudowicz, E., Lok, D., & Kitto, J. (1995). Use of the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking in an exploratory study of creativity in Hong Kong primary school children: A cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Psychology, 30, 417–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., Plucker, J. A., & Lim, W. (2001). Development and psychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 393–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saeki, N., Fan, X., & Van Dusen, L. (2001). A comparative study of creative thinking of American and Japanese college students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 24–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saucier, G. & Goldberg, L. R. (2001). Lexical studies of indigenous personality: Premises, products, and prospects. Journal of Personality, 69, 847–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P., Allik, J., McCrae, R.R., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2007). The geographic distribution of Big Five personality traits: Patterns and profiles of human self-description across 56 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 173–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shade, B. J. (1986). Is there an Afro-American cognitive style? An exploratory study. Journal of Black Psychology, 13, 13–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, D. G. & Singer, J. L. (1990). The house of make-believe: Children's play and the developing imagination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sligh, A. C., Conners, F. A., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, B. (2005). Relation of creativity to fluid and crystallized intelligence. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 123–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stemler, S. E., Grigorenko, E. L., Jarvin, L., & Sternberg, R. J. (2006). Using the theory of successful intelligence as a basis for augmenting AP exams in psychology and statistics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 344–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Successful intelligence: How practical and creative intelligence determine success in life. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2006). How can we simultaneously enhance both academic excellence and diversity? College and University, 81, 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. & The Rainbow Project Collaborators (2006). The Rainbow Project: Enhancing the SAT through assessments of analytical, practical, and creative skills. Intelligence, 34, 321–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2008). Applied intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stricker, L. J., Rock, D. A., & Bennett, R. E. (2001). Sex and ethnic-group differences on accomplishment measures. Applied Measurement in Education, 14, 205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strom, R. & Johnson, A. (1989). Hispanic and Anglo families of gifted children. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 16, 164–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strom, R., Johnson, A., Strom, S., & Strom, P. (1992). Parental differences in expectations of gifted children. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 23, 69–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1966). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-technical manual. Lexington, MA: Personal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1971). Are the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking biased against or in favor of the “disadvantaged” groups? Gifted Child Quarterly, 15, 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1973). Non-test indicators of creative talent among disadvantaged children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 17, 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Lexington, MA: Ginn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troiano, A. B. & Bracken, B. A. (1983). Creative thinking and movement styles of three culturally homogeneous kindergarten groups. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 1, 35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, S. (2006). Validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking to the Brazilian culture. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfradt, U. & Pretz, J. E. (2001). Individual differences in creativity: Personality, story writing, and hobbies. European Journal of Personality, 15, 297–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, S. N. (2005). Comparing the intelligence and creativity scores of Asian American gifted students with Caucasian gifted students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, Lafayette, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zha, P., Walczyk, J. J., & Griffith-Ross, D. A. (2006). The impact of culture and individualism-collectivism on the creative potential and achievement of American and Chinese adults. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 355–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhiyan, T. & Singer, J. L. (1996). Daydreaming styles, emotionality, and the big five personality dimensions. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 16, 399–414.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kaufman, J.C. (2009). Creativity, Intelligence, and Culture: Connections and Possibilities. In: Meusburger, P., Funke, J., Wunder, E. (eds) Milieus of Creativity. Knowledge and Space, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9877-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics