Skip to main content

Reducing the Risks

Policies to Enhance Energy Security

  • Chapter
Power Plays
  • 1346 Accesses

Abstract

A sound energy policy should take into account the supply side, the demand side, and the possibility that projections will be wrong on one or both counts. Energy policy decisions must also factor in the impact on current and future generations, and they should be capable of weathering changing political climates. Unfortunately, when energy policy decisions fail to meet these criteria, the result is a dysfunctional, inconsistent energy policy.

Let our advance worrying become advance thinking and planning. Winston Churchill

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Energy Information Administration (EIA), “Crude Oil Production,” release date July 28, 2011, www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_crd_crpdn_adc_mbblpd _a.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Minerals Management Service (MMS), Assessment of Undiscovered Technically Recoverable Oil and Gas Resources of the Nation’s Outer Continental Shelf, 2006, February 2006, www.boemre.gov/revaldiv/PDFs/2006NationalAssessment Brochure.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  3. EIA, “Impact of Limitations on Access to Oil and Natural Gas Resources in the Federal Outer Continental Shelf,” Annual Energy Outlook 2009, January 2009, www.eia.gov/oiaf/aeo/otheranalysis/aeo_2009analysispapers /aongr.html.

    Google Scholar 

  4. EIA, Analysis of Crude Oil Production in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Report No. SR-OIAF/2008-03, May 2008, www.eia.gov/oiaf/servicerpt /anwr/methodology.html.

    Google Scholar 

  5. U.S. Department of Energy, Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center (AFDC), “E85 FFVs in Use in U.S.,” accessed January 25, 2012, www.afdc.energy.gov/afdc/data/docs/ffvs_in_use.xls.

    Google Scholar 

  6. EIA, Natural Gas Spot and Futures Prices (NYMEX), accessed January 25, 2012, updated weekly at www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_pri_fut_s1_d.htm; EIA, Spot Prices, accessed January 25, 2012, updated weekly at www.eia.gov /dnav/pet/pet_pri_spt_s1_d.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  7. CME Group, CBOT Denatured Fuel Ethanol Futures, accessed January 25, 2012, real-time market updates at www.cmegroup.com/trading/energy /ethanol/cbot-ethanol.html.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Methanex, Methanol Price, “North America (Valid January 1-31, 2012),” accessed January 25, 2012, updated monthly at www.methanex.com /products/methanolprice.html.

    Google Scholar 

  9. U.S. Department of Energy, AFDC, “AFVs in Use: 1995-2009,” accessed January 25, 2012, www.afdc.energy.gov/afdc/data/docs/afvs_in_use.xls.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anne Korin and Gal Luft, Turning Oil into Salt: Energy Independence Through Fuel Choice (BookSurge Publishing, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Robert Rapier

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rapier, R. (2012). Reducing the Risks. In: Power Plays. Apress. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-4087-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics