Skip to main content

In Search of a New Welfare State in Europe: An International Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Welfare State in Post-Industrial Society

Modern social policy represents a key component in Europe’s advanced political economies. The European welfare state in the shape and form in which it developed in the second half of the twentieth century represents a unique historical achievement. Never before in history, as Fritz Scharpf puts it, ‘has democratic politics been so effectively used to promote civil liberty, economic growth, social solidarity, and public well-being’ (Scharpf, 2003). The defining feature of the postwar welfare state is that social protection came to be firmly anchored on the explicit normative commitment to grant social rights to citizens in areas of human need (Esping-Andersen, 1994: 712). This implied the expansion of mass education as an instrument for equal opportunities, access to high quality health care for everyone, together with the introduction of a universal right to real income, in T. H. Marshall’s seminal work, Citizenship and Social Class (1950), ‘not proportionate to the market value of the claimant’ (Marshall, 1950: 110). Social citizenship held out a promise of the enlargement, enrichment, and equalization of people's ‘life chances’ (Marshall, 1950: 107). Thus Marshall defined social policy as the use of democratic ‘political power to supersede, supplement, or modify operations of the economic system in order to achieve results which the economic system would not achieve of his own’ (Marshall, 1975: 15). In his first report, Social Insurance and Allied Services, Lord Beveridge saw “freedom from want” to be the pivotal objective of the welfare state (Beveridge, 1942). In his 1945 Full Employment in a Free Society, however, Beveridge came to view employment, active participation, or inclusion in productive work as a key function of being an accepted part of a larger collective identity (Beveridge, 1945). In Beveridge’s participatory view on full employment, social citizenship went beyond the right to a decent income, to include right to live from labor, to combine their income with the recognition of a social function. Jobs benefit people by giving them enhanced opportunities for self-actualization, personal identity, self-esteem, and the feeling of belonging to a community. Inclusion through the labor market remains a cornerstone of every policy strategy of social inclusion. Participating in the labor market is today the most important form of social interaction and, as such, is an indispensable element in achieving social cohesion. In the words of Guenther Schmid: “Not being wanted is worse than being poor” (Schmid, 2008: 3).

We are still the children of the liberal reformers, patching the mechanisms haphazardly bequeathed to postwar societies proud of their supposed uniqueness.

Hugh Heclo

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Begg, I., Draxler, J., & Mortensen, J. (2008). Is social Europe fir for globalisation? A study of the social impact of globalization in the European Union, CEPS, European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonoli, G. (2005). The politics of the new social policies: Providing coverage against new social risks in mature welfare states. Policy & Politics, 33(3), 431–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonoli, G. (2006). New social risks and the politics of post-industrial social policies. In: K. Armingeon & G. Bonoli (Eds.), The politics of post-industrial welfare states: Adapting post-war social policies to New social Risks (pp. 3–26). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonoli, G., & Taylor-Gooby, P. (2000). European welfare futures: Towards a theory of retrenchment/Giuliano Bonoli, Vic George and Peter Taylor-Gooby (190p.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark G. L., & Whiteside N. (2003). Pension security in the 21st century. Redrawing the Public-Private Debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M. (2000). The gender division of welfare: The impact of the British and German welfare states/Mary Daly (273p.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, K. H. F., & Featherstone, K. (1999). The road to Maastricht: Negotiating economic and monetary union/Kenneth Dyson and Kevin Featherstone (859p.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1985). Politics against markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1994). Welfare states and the economy. In N. J. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 712–732

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (Ed.). (1996). Welfare states in transition. London: Sage;

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of post-industrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (2005). Putting the horse in front of the cart: Towards a social model for mid-century Europe. Gøsta Esping-Andersen, Universitat Pompeu Fabra

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G., & Sarasa, S. (2002). The generational conflict reconsidered, Journal of European Social Policy, 12(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G., Gallie D., Hemerijck, A., & Myles, J. (2002), Why we need a new welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fajertag G., & Pochet, P. (2000). Social pacts in Europe/edited by Giuseppe Fajertag and Philippe Pochet – Brussels: European Trade Union Institute (ETUI) (195p.). Brussels: Observatoire Social Européen (OSE), 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrera, M. (2005). The boundaries of welfare: European integration and the new spatial politics of solidarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrera, M., & Gualmini, E. (2000). Italy: Rescue from without? In F. W. Scharpf & V. A. Schmidt (Eds.), Welfare and work in the open economy, Volume II. Diverse responses to common challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrera, M., Hemerijck, A., & Rhodes, M. (2000). The future of social Europe: Recasting work and welfare in the new economy. Oeiras: Celta Editora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrera, M., & Hemerijck, A. (2003). Recalibrating Europe’s welfare regimes. In J. Zeitlin & D. M. Trubek (Eds.), Governing work and welfare in the new economy: European and American experiments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flora, P. (1986). Growth to limits: The western European welfare states since world war II. (Vols. 1–4). Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, L., & Palmer, E. (1999). New approaches to multi-pillar pension systems: What in the world is going on? World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemerijck, A., & Schludi, M. (2000). Sequences of policy failures and effective policy responses, in F. W. Scharpf & V. Schmidt (Eds.), Welfare and work in the open economy – from vulnerability to competitiveness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, E., & Stephens, J. D. (2001). Development and crisis of the welfare state. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Immergut, E. M., Anderson, K. M., & Schulze, I. (2007). The handbook of pension politics in western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenson, J., & Saint-Martin, D. (2003). New routes to social cohesion? Citizenship and the social investment state. The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 28, 77–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korthouwer, G. (forthcoming). Party politics as We knew it? Electoral failure, intraparty dynamics and welfare reforms in continental Europe. Dissertation. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klammer, U. (2007). SOZIALES – INTERNATIONALES – Europäische Sozialstaaatlichkeit – Entwicklung, Koordination und Gestaltung von Sozialsystemen in der Europäischen Union. Soziale Sicherheit: Zeitschrift für Sozialpolitik: die sozialpolitische Monatschrift der Gewerkschaften, 56, 285–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpi, W. (1983). The democratic class struggle. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J. (1999). Vice into virtue? Progressive politics and welfare reform in continental Europe. Politics and Society, 27(2), 239–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibfried, S., & pierson, P. (2000). Social policy. In H. Wallace & W. Wallace (Eds.), Policy making in the European union, (4th edn., pp. 267–291) Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J. (2005Age in the welfare state: The origins of social spending on pensioners, workers, and children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. H. (1950). Citizenship and social class and other essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A., & Ross, G. (2004). Euros and Europeans: Monetary integration and the European model of society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1981). The welfare state in crisis: an account of the Conference on Social Policies in the 1980s, OECD, Paris, 20–23 October 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1994). The OECD jobs study: evidence and explanations/Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2008). Growing unequal?: income distribution and poverty in OECD countries/Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palme, J. (2005). Features of the Swedish pension reform. The Japanese Journal of Social Security Policy, 4(1), 42–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (1998), Irristesistible forces, immovable objects: Post-industrial welfare states confront permanent austerity. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(4), 539–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (Ed.). (2001). The new politics of the welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. (1982). International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization, 36, 379–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (2003). WRR lecture De vitaliteit van de nationale staat in het Europa van de 21e eeuw/lectures uitgesproken door: F. W. Scharpf, H. A. F. M. O. van Mierlo. – Den Haag: Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid, 52p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W., & Schmidt, V. A. (Eds.) (2000). Welfare and work in the open economy (2 Volumes). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, G. (2008). Full employment in Europe: Managing labour market transitions and risks. Glos: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A. (2000). Values and discourse in the politics of welfare state adjustment. In Fritz W. Scharpf & Vivien A. Schmidt (Eds.), Welfare and work in the open economy. Vol. 1: From vulnerability to competitiveness. Oxford: Osford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiller, S. (2007). Innovative agents versus immovable objects: The role of ideational leadership in german welfare state reforms. Dissertation. Nijmegen: University of Nijmegen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor-Gooby, P. (Ed.). (2004). New risks, new welfare. The transformation of the European welfare state. Oxford: Oxford university Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gerven, M. (2008). Reforming social security rights in Europe; A study of path-dependent but not predetermined change. Helsinki: Social Insurance Institution Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Kersbergen, K. (1995). Social capitalism: A study of christian democracy and the welfare state. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weishaupt, J. T. (2008). The emergence of a new labor market paradigm? Analyzing continuity and change in an integrating Europe. Dissertation. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitlin, J., Pochet, P., & Magnusson, L. (2005). The open method of co-ordination in action. The European employment and social inclusion strategies. P.I.E.-Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton Hemerijck .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hemerijck, A. (2009). In Search of a New Welfare State in Europe: An International Perspective. In: The Welfare State in Post-Industrial Society. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0066-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics