Social learning theory is a general theory of criminal and deviant behaviors that has found consistent and robust empirical support for more than four decades (see Gottfredson & Hirschi, 1990; Hirschi, 1969). The generality and validity of the theory has through those years become increasingly recognized. In a recent major compilation on the status of criminological theory, social learning theory along with control theories (Akers & Jensen, 2006; Akers & Sellers, 2009) and strain theories (Agnew, 1992, 2006) were placed as the “core” theories in the field (Cullen, Wright, & Blevins, 2006). Moreover, according to the latest survey of criminologists, social learning theory is the most frequently endorsed explanation of both minor delinquent and serious criminal behavior (Ellis, Johnathon, & Walsh et al., 2008).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This version of social learning theory is an integration of Sutherland’s (1947) sociological theory of differential association and behavioral principles of conditioning and reinforcement from psychology originally formulated by Robert Burgess and Ronald L. Akers (1966) as “differential association-reinforcement” theory and as it has been developed since then by Akers and others (see Akers, 1973, 1985, 1998; Akers, Krohn, Lanza-Kaduce, & Radosevich, 1979; Akers & Sellers, 2004; Jensen & Akers, 2003). It is this social learning theory of crime and deviance that is typically referred to in criminology and sociology of deviance. However, it should be noted that social learning principles have been used to explain criminal and delinquent behavior as well as applied to treatment and prevention by other social behaviorists working with explanatory models that are compatible with and similar to social learning theory as reviewed here (see Andrews & Bonta, 2003; Patterson, Reid, & Dishion, 1992).
References
Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30, 47–87.
Agnew, R. (2006). Pressured into crime: An overview of general strain theory. Los Angeles: Roxbury.
Akers, R. L. (1973). Deviant behavior: A social learning approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Akers, R. L. (1977). Deviant behavior: A social learning approach. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Akers, R. L. (1985). Deviant behavior: A social learning approach. 3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Akers, R. L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
Akers, R. L., & Cochran, J. K. (1985). Adolescent marijuana use: A test of three theories of deviant behavior. Deviant Behavior, 6, 323–346.
Akers, R. L., & Jennings, W. G. (2009). Social learning theory. In J. M. Miller (Ed.), 21st century criminology: A reference handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Akers, R. L., & Jensen, G. F. (2006). The empirical status of social learning theory of crime and deviance: The past, present, and future. In. F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright, & K. R. Blevins (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Akers, R. L., Krohn, M. D., Lanza-Kaduce, L., & Radosevich, M. (1979). Social learning and deviant behavior: A specific test of a general theory. American Sociological Review, 44, 636–655.
Akers, R. L., La Greca, A. J., Cochran, J., & Sellers, C. (1989). Social learning theory and alcohol behavior among the elderly. Sociological Quarterly, 30, 625–638.
Akers, R. L., Lane, J., & Lanza-Kaduce, L. (2008). Faith-based mentoring and restorative justice: Overlapping theoretical, empirical, and philosophical background. In H. V. Miller (Ed.), Restorative justice: From theory to practice. Sociology of Crime, Law and Deviance, Vol. 11 (pp. 136–166). United Kingdom: Elsevier.
Akers, R. L., & Lee, G. (1996). A longitudinal test of social learning theory: Adolescent smoking. Journal of Drug Issues, 26, 317–343.
Akers, R. L., & Sellers, C. S. (2004). Criminological theories: Introduction, evaluation, and application. 4th ed. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing.
Akers, R. L., & Sellers, C. S. (2009). Criminological theories: Introduction, evaluation, and application. 5th ed. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing.
Akers, R. L., & Silverman, A. (2004). Toward a social learning model of violence and terrorism. In M. A. Zahn, H. H. Brownstein, & S. L. Jackson (Eds.), Violence: From theory to research (pp. 19–35). Cincinnati, OH: LexisNexis-Anderson Publishing.
Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2003). The psychology of criminal conduct. 3rd ed. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing.
Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.
Bandura, A. (1979). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1990). Mechanisms of moral disengagement. In W. Reich (Ed.), Origins of terrorism: Psychologies, ideologies, theologies, and states of mind (pp. 161–191). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bandura, A., & Walters, R. (1963). Social learning and personality development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Battin, S. R., Hill, K. G., Abbott, R. D., Catalano, R. F., & Hawkins, J. D. (1998). The contribution of gang membership to delinquency beyond delinquent friends. Criminology, 36, 93–115.
Batton, C., & Ogle, R. S. (2003). ‘Who’s it gonna be–you or me?’ The potential of social learning for integrated homicide-suicide theory. In R. L. Akers & G. F. Jensen (Eds.), Social learning theory and the explanation of crime: A guide for the new century. Advances in Criminological Theory, Vol. 11 (pp. 85–108). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Bellair, P. E., Roscigno, V. J., & Velez, M. B. (2003). Occupational structure, social learning, and adolescent violence. In R. L. Akers & G. F. Jensen (Eds.), Social learning theory and the explanation of crime: A guide for the new century. Advances in criminological theory, Vol. 11 (pp. 197–226). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Benda, B. B. (1994). Testing competing theoretical concepts: Adolescent alcohol-consumption. Deviant Behavior, 15, 375–396.
Boeringer, S., Shehan, C. L., & Akers, R. L. (1991). Social contexts and social learning in sexual coercion and aggression: Assessing the contribution of fraternity membership. Family Relations, 40, 558–564.
Botvin, G., Baker, E., Dusenbury, L., Botvin, E., & Diaz, T. (1995). Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug-abuse prevention trial in a white middle class population. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273, 1106–1112.
Brezina, T., & Piquero, A. R. (2003). Exploring the relationship between social and non-social reinforcement in the context of social learning theory. In R. L. Akers & G. F. Jensen (Eds.), Social learning theory and the explanation of crime: A guide for the new century. Advances in criminological theory, Vol. 11 (pp. 265–288). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Brown, E. C., Catalano, R. F., Fleming, C. B., Haggerty, K. P., & Abbott, R. D. (2005). Adolescent substance use outcomes in the Raising Health Children Project: A two-part latent growth curve analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 699–710.
Bruinsma, G. J. (1992). Differential association theory reconsidered: An extension and its empirical test. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 8, 29–49.
Burgess, R. L., & Akers, R. L. (1966). A differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior. Social Problems, 14, 128–147.
Burton, V. S., Cullen, F. T., Evans, T. L., & Dunaway, R. G. (1994). Reconsidering strain theory: Operationalization, rival theories, and adult criminality. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 10, 213–239.
Chamberlain, P., Fisher, P. A., & Moore, K. (2002) Multidimensional treatment foster care: Applications of the OSLC intervention model to high risk youth and their families. In J. B. Reid, G. R. Patterson, & J. Snyder (Eds.), Antisocial behavior in children and adolescents: A developmental analysis and model for intervention (pp. 203–218). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Chappell, A. T., & Piquero, A. R. (2004). Applying social learning theory to police misconduct. Deviant Behavior, 25, 89–108.
Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s money. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Cressey, D. R. (1960). Epidemiology and individual conduct: A case from criminology. Pacific Sociological Review, 3, 47–58.
Cullen, F. T., Wright, J. P., & Blevins, K. R. (Eds.). (2006). Taking stock: The status of criminological theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Cullen, F. T., Wright, J. P., Gendreau, P., & Andrews, D. A. (2003). What correctional treatment can tell us about criminological theory: Implications for social learning theory. In R. L. Akers & G. F. Jensen (Eds.), Social learning theory and the explanation of crime: A guide for the new century. Advances in criminological theory, Vol. 11 (pp. 339–362). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Dishion, T. J., Patterson, G. R., & Kavanagh, K. A. (1992). An experimental test of the coercion model: Linking theory, measurement, and intervention. In J. McCord & R. E. Tremblay (Eds.), Preventing antisocial behavior: Interventions from birth through adolescence (pp. 253–282). New York: Guilford Press.
Eddy, J. M., & Chamberlain, P. (2000). Family management and deviant peer association as mediators of the impact of treatment condition on youth antisocial behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,68, 857–863.
Ellis, L., Johnathon A. C., & Walsh, A. (2008). Criminologists’ opinions about causes and theories of crime and delinquency: A follow-up. The Criminologist, 33 (May/June), 23–26.
Ellis, R., & Sowers, S. (2001). Juvenile justice practice: A cross-disciplinary approach to intervention. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Gendreau P., & Smith, P. (2006). The theory of effective correctional intervention: Empirical status and future directions. In F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright, & K. R. Blevins (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory. Advances in criminological theory, Vol. 15 (pp. 419–446). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Hall, S. (2003). Faith-based cognitive programs in corrections. Corrections Today, 65, 108--137.
Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Arthur, M. (2002). Promoting science-based prevention in communities. Addictive Behaviors, 90, 1–26.
Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., Kosterman, R., Abbott, R., & Hill, K. G. (1999). Preventing adolescent health-risk behaviors by strengthening protection during childhood. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 153, 226–234.
Hawkins, J. D., Kosterman, R., Catalano, R.F., Hill, K.G., & Abbott, R.D. (2005). Promoting positive adult functioning through social development intervention in childhood: Long-term effects from the Seattle Social Development Project. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 159, 25–31.
Haynie, D. L. (2002). Friendship networks and delinquency: The relative nature of peer delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 99–134.
Haynie, D. L., Silver, E., & Teasdale, B. (2006). Neighborhood characteristics, peer networks, and adolescent violence. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 147–169.
Hewitt, J. P., & Stokes, R. (1975). Disclaimers. American Sociological Review, 40, 1–11.
Hirschi, T. (1969). The causes of delinquency. Berkeley, CA: The University of California Press.
Hoffman, K. L., Kiecolt, K. J., & Edwards, J. (2005). Physical violence between siblings: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 1103–1130.
Holland-Davis, L. (2006). Putting behavior in context: A test of the social structure social learning model. PhD dissertation. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
Hwang, S., & Akers, R. L. (2003). Substance use by Korean adolescents: A cross-cultural test of social learning, social bonding, and self-control theories. In R. L. Akers & G. F. Jensen (Eds.), Social learning theory and the explanation of crime: A guide for the new century. Advances in criminological theory, Vol. 11 (pp. 39–64). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Hwang, S., & Akers, R. L. (2006). Parental and peer influences on adolescent drug use in Korea. Asian Journal of Criminology, 1, 51–69.
Jennings, W. G., Gover, A. R., & Hitchcock, D. M. (2008). Localizing restorative justice: An in-depth look at a Denver public school program. In H. V. Miller (Ed.), Sociology of Crime, Law, and Deviance, Vol. 11 (pp. 167–187). Bingley, UK: JAI Press.
Jensen, G. F., & Akers, R. L. (2003). Taking social learning global: Micro-macro transitions in criminological theory. In R. L. Akers & G. F. Jensen (Eds.), Social learning theory and the explanation of crime: A guide for the new century. Advances in criminological theory, Vol. 11 (pp. 9–38). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Krohn, M. D., Skinner, W. F., Massey, J. L., & Akers, R. L. (1985). Social learning theory and adolescent cigarette smoking. Social Problems, 32, 455–473.
Landenberger, N. A., & Lipsey, M. (2005). The positive effects of cognitive behavioral programs for offenders: A meta-analysis of factors associated with effective treatment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 457–476.
Lanza-Kaduce, L., Akers, R. L., Krohn, M. D., & Radosevich, M. (1984). Cessation of alcohol and drug use among adolescents: A social learning model. Deviant Behavior, 5, 79–96.
Lauritsen, J. L. (1993). Sibling resemblance in juvenile delinquency: Findings from the National Youth Survey. Criminology, 31, 387–409.
Lee, G., Akers, R. L., & Borg, M. (2004). Social learning and structural factors in adolescent substance use. Western Criminology Review, 5, 17–34.
Lösel, F. (1995). The efficacy of correctional treatment: A review and synthesis of meta evaluations. In J. McGuire (Ed.), What works: Reducing reoffending, guidelines from research and practice (pp. 79–111). New York: Wiley.
Lösel, F. (2007). Counterblast: The prison overcrowding crisis and some constructive perspectives for crime policy. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 512–519.
Lyman, S. M., & Scott, M. B. (1970). A sociology of the absurd. 2nd ed. Dix Hills, NJ: General Hall.
McCord, J. (1991). Family relationships, juvenile delinquency, and adult criminality. Criminology, 29, 397–417.
McGloin, J. M., Pratt, T. C., & Maahs, J. (2004). Rethinking the IQ-delinquency relationship: A longitudinal analysis of multiple theoretical models. Justice Quarterly, 21, 603–635.
Miller, H. V., Jennings, W. G., Alvarez-Rivera, L. L., & Miller, J. M. (2008). Explaining substance use among Puerto Rican adolescents: A partial test of social learning theory. Journal of Drug Issues, 38, 261–284.
Neff, J. L. & Waite, D. E. (2007). Male versus female substance abuse patterns among incarcerated juvenile offenders: Comparing strain and social learning variables. Justice Quarterly, 24, 106–132.
Patterson, G. R. (1975). Families: Applications of social learning to family life. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
Patterson, G. R., & Chamberlain, P. (1994). A functional analysis of resistance during parent training therapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 1, 53–70.
Patterson, G. R., Debaryshe, B. D, & Ramsey, E. (1989). A developmental perspective on antisocial behavior. American Psychologist, 44, 329–35.
Patterson, G. R., Reid, J. B., & Dishion, T. J. (1992). Antisocial boys. Eugene, OR: Castalia Publishing Co.
Pearson, F. S., Lipton, D. S., Cleland, C. M., & Yee, D. S. (2002). The effects of behavioral/cognitive-behavioral programs on recidivism. Crime and Delinquency, 48, 476–496.
Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931–964.
Rebellon, C. J. (2002). Reconsidering the broken homes/delinquency relationship and exploring its mediating mechanism(s). Criminology, 40, 103–136.
Sellers, C. S., Cochran, J. K., & Winfree, T. L., Jr. (2003). Social learning theory and courtship violence: An empirical test. In R. L. Akers & G. F. Jensen (Eds.), Social learning theory and the explanation of crime: A guide for the new century. Advances in criminological theory, Vol. 11 (pp. 109–128). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Simons, R. L., Simons, L. G., & Wallace, L. E. (2004). Families, delinquency, and crime. Los Angeles, CA Roxbury.
Simons, R. L., Wu, C. I., Conger, R. D., & Lorenz, F. (1994). Two routes to delinquency: Differences between early and late starters in the impact of parenting and deviant peers. Criminology, 32, 247–276.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
Skinner, B. F. (1959). Cumulative record. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.
Snyder, J. J., & Patterson, G. R. (1995). Individual-differences in social aggression: A test of a reinforcement model of socialization in the natural-environment. Behavior Therapy, 26, 371–391.
Sumter, M. T., & Clear, T. R. (2005). Religion in the correctional setting. In R. Muraskin (Ed.), Key correctional issues (pp. 86–113). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Sutherland, E. H. (1947). Principles of criminology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.
Sykes, G., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Journal of Sociology, 22, 664–670.
Triplett, R., & Payne, B. (2004). Problem solving as reinforcement in adolescent drug use: Implications for theory and policy. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 617–630.
Ventura, H. E. (Ed.). (2008). Restorative justice: From theory to practice. Sociology of Crime, Law and Deviance, Vol. 11. Bingley, UK: JAI Press.
Verrill, S. W. (2008). Social structure, social learning, and criminal behavior: Cross-level moderator effects. New York: LFB Scholarly.
Wang, S., & Jensen, G. F. (2003). Explaining delinquency in Taiwan: A test of social learning theory. In R. L. Akers & G. F. Jensen (Eds.), Social learning theory and the explanation of crime: A guide for the new century. Advances in criminological theory, Vol. 11 (pp. 65–84). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Warr, M. (2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wiesner, M., Capaldi, D. M., & Patterson, G. (2003). Development of antisocial behavior and crime across the life-span from a social interactional perspective: The coercion model. In R. L. Akers & G. F. Jensen (Eds.), Social learning theory and the explanation of crime: A guide for the new century. Advances in criminological theory, Vol. 11 (pp. 317–338). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Winfree, T. L., Jr., Mays, G. L., & Vigil-Backstrom, T. (1994). Youth gangs and incarcerated delinquents: Exploring the ties between gang membership, delinquency, and social learning theory. Justice Quarterly, 11, 229–256.
Winfree, T. L., Jr., Vigil-Backstrom, T., & Mays, G. L. (1994). Social learning theory, self-reported delinquency, and youth gangs: A new twist on a general theory of crime and delinquency. Youth and Society, 26, 147–177.
Zhang, L., & Messner, S. F. (1995). Family deviance and delinquency in China. Criminology, 33, 359–387.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Akers, R.L., Jennings, W.G. (2009). The Social Learning Theory of Crime and Deviance. In: Krohn, M., Lizotte, A., Hall, G. (eds) Handbook on Crime and Deviance. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0245-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0245-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0244-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0245-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)