Skip to main content

Transparency

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Design of Observational Studies

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Statistics ((SSS))

  • 8280 Accesses

Abstract

Transparency means making evidence evident. An observational study that is not transparent may be overwhelming or intimidating, but it is unlikely to be convincing. Several aspects of transparency are briefly discussed.

The beliefs we have most warrant for, have no safeguard to rest on, but a standing invitation to the whole world to prove them unfounded. If the challenge is not accepted, or is accepted and the attempt fails, we are far enough from certainty still; but we have done the best the existing state of human reason admits of… ? This is the amount of certainty attainable by a fallible being, and this is the sole way of attaining it.

John Stuart Mill [4, page 21]

The objectivity of all science, including mathematics, is inseparably linked with its criticizability.

Karl R. Popper [6, page 137]

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Cox, D.R.: Planning of Experiments. New York: Wiley (1958)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D.R.: Applied statistics: a review. Ann Appl Statist 1, 1–16 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Joffe, M.M., Colditz, G.A. : Restriction as a method for reducing bias in the estimation of direct effects. Statist Med 17, 2233–2249 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S.: On Liberty. New York: Barnes and Nobel (1859, reprinted 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Peto, R., Pike, M., Armitage, P., Breslow, N., Cox, D., Howard, S., Mantel, N., McPherson, K., Peto, J., Smith, P. Design and analysis of randomised clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient, I. Br J Cancer 34, 585–612 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R.: Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P.R.: Observational Studies. New York: Springer (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Susser, M.: Causal Thinking in the Health Sciences. New York: Oxford University Press (1973)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul R. Rosenbaum .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rosenbaum, P.R. (2010). Transparency. In: Design of Observational Studies. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1213-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics