Skip to main content

Detecting Malingering on the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery

  • Chapter
Detection of Malingering during Head Injury Litigation

Part of the book series: Critical Issues in Neuropsychology ((CINP))

Abstract

Malingering is a condition in which a patient consciously feigns symptoms of a physical or psychological disorder for the purposes of gain. This purpose may be conscious or unconscious in terms of the individuals’ awareness of their own motivation. However, the attempts to falsify test responses are deliberate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bernard, L. C. (1990). Prospects for faking believable memory deficits on neuropsychological tests and the use of incentives in simulation research. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 12 (5), 715 – 728.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard L. C. (1991). The detection of faked deficits on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test: The effect of serial position. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 6, 81 – 88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bickart, W. T., Meyer, R. G., & Connell, D. K. (1991). The symptom validity technique as a measure of feigned short-term memory deficit. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 9(2), 3 – 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, L. M. (1993). Assessment of malingering after mild head trauma with the Portland Digit Recognition test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 15(2), 170 – 182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, L. M., & Willis, S. C. (1991). Assessment of motivation after financially compensable minor head trauma. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3, 175 – 181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gfeller, J. K., Cradock, M. M., & Falkenhain, M. A. ( 1994, November). Detecting feigned neuropsychological impairment with the Seashore Rhythm Test. Poster presented at the Annual Conference of the National Academy of Neuropsychology, Orlando, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, C. J. (1992). [Performance of feigned malingerers on the Luria—Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery]. Unpublished raw data.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, C. J., Berg, R. A., & Graber, B. (1982). Test—retest reliability of the Luria-Nebraska Neuro-psychological Battery in stable, chronically impaired patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 452–454.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Golden, C. J., Hammeke, T. A., Punisch, A. D., Berg, R. A., Moses, J. A., Jr., Newlin, D. B.. Wilkening, G. N., & Puente, A. E. (1982). Item interpretation of the Luria—Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilmette, T. J.,Hart, K. J., & Giuliano, A. J. (1993). Malingering detection: The use of a forced-choice method in identifying organic versus simulated memory impairment. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 7(1),59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiscock, M., & Hiscock, C. K. (1989). Refining the forced choice method for the detection of malingering. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 11, 967 – 974.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. C., Bolter, J. F., Todd, M. E., Gouvier, W. D., & Niccolls, S. (1993). Effects of sophistication and motivation on the detection of malingered memory performance using a computerized forced-choice test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 15(6), 867 – 880.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mensch, A. J., & Woods, D. J. (1986). Patterns of feigning brain damage on the LNNB. The International Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 8 (2), 59 – 63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plaisted, J. R., & Golden, C. J. (1982). Test—retest reliability of the clinical, factor, and localization scales of the Luria—Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery. International Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 163–167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prigatano, G. P., & Amin, K. (1993). Digit Memory Test: Unequivocal cerebral dysfunction and suspected malingering. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 15(4), 537 – 546.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slick, D., Hopp, G., Strauss, E., Hunter, M., & Pinch, D. (1994). Detecting dissimulation: Profiles of simulated malingerers, traumatic brain-injury patients, and normal controls on a revised version of Hiscock and Hiscock’s forced-choice memory test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuro-psychology, 16 (3), 472–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Golden, C.J., Grier, C.A. (1998). Detecting Malingering on the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery. In: Reynolds, C.R. (eds) Detection of Malingering during Head Injury Litigation. Critical Issues in Neuropsychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7469-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7469-3_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7468-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7469-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics