Skip to main content

Web-Based Learning Objects in School Education

Pedagogical Usability Issues

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multiple Perspectives on Problem Solving and Learning in the Digital Age
  • 1509 Accesses

Abstract

The added value of Web-based learning objects (WBLOs) lies in supporting learners to acquire the right knowledge and skills in order to function as active and collaborative learners. To realize this, WBLOs must be both technically and pedagogically usable. Technical usability in itself is not sufficient. To support the learning process, the usability concept must be extended to include pedagogical considerations. The importance of pedagogical usability in education has been recognized, but not sufficiently researched. In addition, little research has been done to evaluate the pedagogical value of WBLOs. The main goal of this paper is to show how to foster pedagogically usable WBLOs in school education. The article also reports on students’ perceptions of WBLOs by means of survey questionnaires

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Belland, B. R. (2009). Using the theory of habitus to move beyond the study of barriers to technology integration. Computers & Education,52, 353–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinck, T., Gergle, D., & Wood, S. D. (2002). Usabilityfor the web: Designing web sites that work. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, L., Large, A., Beheshti, J., & Nesset, V. (2005). Children and adults working together in the zone of proximal development: A concept for user-centered design. Proceedings ofAnnual CAIS/ACSI conference 2005. Retrieved October 29, 2009, from http://www.cais-acsi.ca/proceedings/2005/bowler_2005.pdf

  • Elliott, G.J., Jones, E., & Barker, P. (2002). A grounded approach to modeling learnability of hypermedia authoring tools. Interacting with Computers, 14, 547–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erstad, O. (2006). A new direction? Digital literacy, student participation and curriculum reform in Norway. Education and Information Technologies,11, 415–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadanidis, G., & Schindler, K. (2006). Learning objects, Type II Applications, and embedded pedagogical models. Computers in the Schools,21(1), 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, A. (2003). Usability of alternative web course structures. Computer in the Schools, 19(3), 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • ITU Monitor (2009). The digital state of affairs in norwegian schools. Retrieved September 20, 2009, from http://www.itu.no/ITU+Monitor.9UFRDSXH.ips

  • Jamieson-proctor, R., Watson, G., Finger, G., Grimbek, G., & Burnett, P. C. (2007). Measuring the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in the classroom. Computers in the Schools, 21(1), 167–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, P., & Sutherland, R. (2009). Teaching and learning with ICT: New technology, new pedagogy? Education, Communication & Information,4(1), 101–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, R., & Petrarca, D. (2009). Exploring teachers perceptions of web-based learning tools. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 5, 27–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2004). Usability and pedagogical design: Are language learning web sites special? Proceedings of ED-MEDIA (World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications), Lugano, Switzerland, June 21–26, 2004. Retrieved September 2, 2009, from http://www.editlib.org/p/11686, 4235–4242.

  • Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leacock, T. L., & Nesbit, J. C. (2007). A framework for the quality of multimedia resources. Educational Technology & Society,10(2), 44–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., Sun, X., & Zhang, K. (2007). Culture-centered design: Cultural factors in interface usability and usability tests. Proceedings of IEEE Societie’s ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking, and Parallel/Distribute Computing 1084–1088, Washington, DC, IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L., & Johnson, D. L. (2005). Web-based resources and applications. Computer in the Schools, 21(3), 31–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddux, C. D. (2005). The web in K-12 education. Computers in the Schools,21(3), 149–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinidale, T., Cates, W. M., & Qian, Y. (2005). Analysis of recognized web-based educational resources. Computers in the Schools, 21(3), 101–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayes, J. T., & Fowler, C. J. (1999). Learning technology and usability: A framework for understanding courseware. Interacting with Computers,11(5), 485–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nam, C. S., & Smith-Jackson, T. L. (2007). Web-based learning environment: A theory-based design process for development and evaluation. Journal of Information Technology Education,6, 23–44. Retrieved September 15, 2009, from http://www.jite.org/documents/Vol6/JITEv6p023-043Nam145.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nokelainen, P. (2006). An empirical assessment of pedagogical usability criteria for digital learning material with elementary school students. Educational Technology & Society,9(2), 178–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (2000). Designing web usability: The practice of simplicity. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. Boston: Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sedig, K., Klawe, M., & Westrom, M. (2001). Role of interface manipulation style and scaffolding on cognition and concept learning in learnware. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction,8(1), 34–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squires, D., & Preece, J. (1999). Predicting quality in educational software: Evaluating for learning, usability and the synergy between them. Interacting with Computers, 11, 467–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tselios, N., Avouris, N., & Komis, V. (2008). The effective combination of hybrid usability methods in evaluating educational applications of ICT: Issues and challenges. Education and Information Technologies, 13, 55–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Said Hadjerrouit .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hadjerrouit, S. (2011). Web-Based Learning Objects in School Education. In: Ifenthaler, D., Spector, J., Isaias, P., Sampson, D. (eds) Multiple Perspectives on Problem Solving and Learning in the Digital Age. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7612-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics