Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Expertise Reversal Effect

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cognitive Load Theory

Abstract

The expertise reversal effect was initially predicted by cognitive load theory as a form of the redundancy effect (see Chapter 11) that occurs when information beneficial to novice learners becomes redundant to those more knowledgeable. It is one of several cognitive load effects that rely on an interaction between a basic cognitive load effect, in this case the redundancy effect, and other factors, in this case levels of expertise. As an example of the expertise reversal effect, detailed textual explanations, especially if they are embedded into diagrams thus reducing the possibility of ignoring them, may be essential for novices but redundant for experts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amadieu, F., Tricot, A., & Mariné, C. (2009). Prior knowledge in learning from a non-linear electronic document: Disorientation and coherence of the reading sequences. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 381–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amadieu, F., van Gog, T., Paas, F., Tricot, A., & Mariné, C. (2009). Effects of prior knowledge and concept-map structure on disorientation, cognitive load, and learning. Learning and Instruction, 19, 376–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, P. (2006b). Using subjective measures to detect variations of intrinsic cognitive load within problems. Learning and Instruction, 16, 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blayney, P., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2010). Interactions between the isolated–interactive elements effect and levels of learner expertise: Experimental evidence from an accountancy class. Instructional Science, 38, 277–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunstein, A., Betts, S., & Anderson, J. R. (2009). Practice enables successful learning under minimal guidance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 790–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, J., & Reigeluth, C. M. (1992). Instructional prescriptions for learner control. Educational Technology Research and Development, 32, 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, T., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2005). The impact of sequencing and prior knowledge on learning mathematics through spreadsheet applications. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. (1967). How can instruction be adapted to individual differences. In R. Gagne (Ed.), Learning and individual differences (pp. 23–39). Columbus: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federico, P.-A. (1980). Adaptive instruction: Trends and issues. In R. Snow, P.-A. Federico, & W. Montague (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction (Cognitive process analyses of aptitude, Vol. 1, pp. 1–26). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federico, P.-A. (1999). Hypermedia environments and adaptive instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 653–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S. (2006a). Assessment of learners’ organised knowledge structures in adaptive learning environments. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 333–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S. (2007). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 509–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S. (2008a). Relative effectiveness of animated and static diagrams: An effect of learner prior knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 852–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S. (2008b). When less is more in cognitive diagnosis: A rapid online method for diagnosing learner task-specific expertise. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 603–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38, 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1998). Levels of expertise and instructional design. Human Factors, 40, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2000). Incorporating learner experience into the design of multimedia instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 126–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2001). Learner experience and efficiency of instructional guidance. Educational Psychology, 21, 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2004). When redundant on-screen text in multimedia technical instruction can interfere with learning. Human Factors, 46, 567–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., Tuovinen, J., & Sweller, J. (2001). When problem solving is superior to studying worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 579–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S., & Renkl, A. (2010). Expertise reversal effect and its instructional implications: Introduction to the special issue. Instructional Science, 38, 209–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2004). Measuring knowledge to optimize cognitive load factors during instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 558–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2005). Rapid dynamic assessment of expertise to improve the efficiency of adaptive e-learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. H., & Kalyuga, S. (in press-b). Effectiveness of on-screen pinyin in learning Chinese: An expertise reversal for multimedia redundancy effect. Computers in Human Behavior.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., Plass, J. L., & Homer, B. D. (2006). Optimizing cognitive load for learning from computer-based science simulations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 902–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohman, D. F. (1986). Predicting mathemathanic effects in the teaching of higher-order thinking skills. Educational Psychologist, 21, 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., & Gallini, J. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 715–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., Steinhoff, K., Bower, G., & Mars, R. (1995). A generative theory of textbook design: Using annotated illustrations to foster meaningful learning of science text. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43, 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., Stiehl, C. C., & Greeno, J. G. (1975). Acquisition of understanding and skill in relation to subjects’ preparation and meaningfulness of instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 331–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. (1975). Learner control: Beyond aptitude-treatment interactions. AV Communication Review, 23, 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemiec, R. P., Sikorski, C., & Walberg, H. J. (1996). Learner-control effects: A review of reviews and a meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15, 157–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nückles, M., Hübner, S., Dümer, S., & Renkl, A. (2010). Expertise reversal effects in writing-to-learn. Instructional Science, 38, 237–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksa, A., Kalyuga, S., & Chandler, P. (2010). Expertise reversal effect in using explanatory notes for readers of Shakespearean text. Instructional Science, 38, 217–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, E., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2002). Assimilating complex information. Learning and Instruction, 12, 61–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reisslein, J., Atkinson, R. K., Seeling, P., & Reisslein, M. (2006). Encountering the expertise reversal effect with a computer-based environment on electrical circuit analysis. Learning and Instruction, 16, 92–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renkl, A. (1997). Learning from worked-out examples: A study on individual differences. Cognitive Science, 21, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renkl, A., & Atkinson, R. K. (2003). Structuring the transition from example study to problem solving in cognitive skill acquisition: A cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychologist, 38, 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renkl, A., Atkinson, R. K., Maier, U. H., & Staley, R. (2002). From example study to problem solving: Smooth transitions help learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 70, 293–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salden, R. J. C. M., Paas, F., Broers, N. J., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2004). Mental effort and performance as determinants for the dynamic selection of learning tasks in air traffic control training. Instructional Science, 32, 153–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salden, R. J. C. M., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2006b). Personalised adaptive task selection in air traffic control: Effects on training efficiency and transfer. Learning and Instruction, 16, 350–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheiter, M., & Gerjets, P. (2007). Making your own order: Order effects in system- and user-controlled settings for learning and problem solving. In F. Ritter, J. Nerb, E. Lehtinen, & T. O’Shea (Eds.), In order to learn: How the sequence of topics influences learning (pp. 195–212). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnotz, W., & Rasch, T. (2005). Enabling, facilitating, and inhibiting effects of animations in multimedia learning: Why reduction of cognitive load can have negative results on learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seufert, T. (2003). Supporting coherence formation in learning from multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 13, 227–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seufert, T., Schütze, M., & Brünken, R. (2009). Memory characteristics and modality in multimedia learning: An aptitude-treatment-interaction study. Learning and Instruction, 19, 28–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, A. M. (1999). The relationship between prior knowledge and interactive overviews during hypermedia-aided learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20, 143–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, E. C., Schallert, D. L., & Savenye, W. C. (1994). Effects of learner control, advisement, and prior knowledge on young students’ learning in a hypertext environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42, 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shute, V. J., & Gluck, K. A. (1996). Individual differences in patterns of spontaneous online tool use. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5, 329–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R. E. (1989). Aptitude-treatment interaction as a framework for research on individual differences in learning. In P. L. Ackerman, R. J. Sternberg, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Learning and individual differences: Advances in theory and research (pp. 13–59). New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R. E. (1994). Abilities in academic tasks. In R. J. Sternberg & R. K. Wagner (Eds.), Mind in context: Interactionist perspectives on human intelligence (pp. 3–37). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R. E., & Lohman, D. F. (1984). Toward a theory of cognitive aptitude for learning from instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 347–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, E. R. (1977). Review of student control in computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 3, 84–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, E. R. (1989). Cognition and learner control: A literature review, 1977–1988. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 16, 117–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennyson, R. D. (1975). Adaptive instructional models for concept acquisition. Educational Technology, 15, 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, S. (1976). Achievement treatment interactions. Review of Educational Research, 46, 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, S. (1987). Mandatory text review and interaction with student characteristics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 154–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, S. (1988). Teaching strategic text review by computer and interaction with student characteristics. Computers in Human Behavior, 4, 299–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, S. (1989). Another look at research on the adaptation of instruction to student characteristics. Educational Psychologist, 24, 213–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuovinen, J. E., & Sweller, J. (1999). A comparison of cognitive load associated with discovery learning and worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 334–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gog, T., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2004). Process-oriented worked examples: Improving transfer performance through enhanced understanding. Instructional Science, 32, 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gog, T., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2008). Effects of studying sequences of process-oriented and product-oriented worked examples on troubleshooting transfer efficiency. Learning and Instruction, 18, 211–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1990). Strategies for programming instruction in high school: Program completion vs. program generation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6, 65–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kester, L. (2003). Taking the load off a learner’s mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 147–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, A. S., Jin, P., & Sweller, J. (1998). Cognitive load and learner expertise: Split-attention and redundancy effects in reading with explanatory notes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2052

    John Sweller, Paul Ayres & Slava Kalyuga

Authors
  1. John Sweller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul Ayres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Slava Kalyuga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Sweller .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sweller, J., Ayres, P., Kalyuga, S. (2011). The Expertise Reversal Effect. In: Cognitive Load Theory. Explorations in the Learning Sciences, Instructional Systems and Performance Technologies, vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation