Skip to main content

Registered 3D Tagged MRI and Ultrasound Myocardial Elastography: Quantitative Strain Comparison

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multi Modality State-of-the-Art Medical Image Segmentation and Registration Methodologies
  • 1110 Accesses

Abstract

Ultrasound myocardial elastography (UME) and tagged magnetic resonance imaging (tMRI) are two imaging modalities that were developed in the recent years to quantitatively estimate the myocardial deformations. Tagged MRI is currently considered as the gold standard for myocardial strain mapping in vivo. However, despite the low SNR nature of ultrasound signals, echocardiography enjoys the widespread availability in the clinic, as well as its low cost and high temporal resolution. Comparing the strain estimation performances of the two techniques has been of great interests to the community. In order to assess the cardiac deformation across different imaging modalities, in this chapter, we developed a semiautomatic intensity and gradient-based registration framework that rigidly registers the 3D tagged MRIs with the 2D ultrasound images. In addition, we introduced a series of Gabor filter bank-based tMRI image analysis techniques to remove tagging lines or grids, track tagging sheets, and estimate myocardial strain values in tMRI. Based on the two registered modalities, we conducted spatially and temporally more detailed quantitative strain comparison of the RF-based UME technique and tagged MRI. From the experimental results, we conclude that qualitatively the two modalities share similar overall trends. But error and variations in UME accumulate over time. Quantitatively tMRI is more robust and accurate than UME.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 229.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Konofagou EE, Dhhooge J, Ophir J (2002) Myocardial elastography – a feasibility study in vivo. Ultrasound Med Biol 28(4):475–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee W-N, Ingrassia CM, Fung-Kee-Fung SD, Costa KD, Holmes JW, Konofagou EE (2007) Theoretical quality assessment of myocardial elastography with in vivo validation. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 54(11):2233–2245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Notomi Y, Lysyansky P, Setser RM, Shiota T, Popovic ZB, Martin-Miklovic MG, Weaver JA, Oryszak SJ, Greenberg NL, White RD, Thomas JD (2005) Measurement of ventricular torsion by two-dimensional ultrasound speckle tracking imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:2034–2041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Helle-Valle T, Crosby J, Edvardsen T, Lyseggen E, Amundsen BH, Smith H-J, Rosen BD, Lima JAC, Torp H, Ihlen H, Smiseth OA (2005) New noninvasive method for assessment of left ventricular rotation – speckle tracking echocardiography. Circulation 112:3149–3156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cho GY, Chan J, Leano R, Strudwick M, Marwick TH (2006) Comparison of two-dimensional speckle and tissue velocity based strain and validation with harmonic phase magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol 97:1661–1666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee W-N, Qian Z, Tosti CL, Brown TR, Metaxas DN, Konofagou EE (2008) Preliminary validation of angle-independent myocardial elastography using MR tagging in a clinical setting. Ultrasound Med Biol 34(12):1980–1997

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Makela T, Clarysse P, Sipilä O, Pauna N, Pham QC, Katila T, Magnin IE (2002) A review of cardiac image registration methods. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 21(9):1011–1021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Roche A, Pennec X, Malandain G, Ayache N (2001) Rigid registration of 3D ultrasound with MR images: a new approach combining intensity and gradient information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20(10):1038–1049, PMID: 11686439

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang X, Hill NA, Ren J, Guiraudon G, Boughner D, Peters TM (2005) Dynamic 3D ultrasound and MR image registration of the beating heart. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 8(Pt 2):171–178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Manglik T, Axel L, Pai W, Kim D, Dugal P, Montillo A, Qian Z (2004) Use of bandpass gabor filters for enhancing blood-myocardium contrast and filling-in tags in tagged MR images. In: Proceedings of the international society for magnetic resonance in medicine, p 1793

    Google Scholar 

  11. Daugman J (1985) Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency, and orientation optimized by two-dimensional visual cortical filters. J Opt Soc Am A 2(7):1160–1169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dunn D, Higgins WE, Wakeley J (1994) Texture segmentation using 2-d gabor elementary functions. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 16:130–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lai WM (1993) Introduction to continuum mechanics, 3rd edn. Woburn, MA, Butterworth-Heinemann

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kallel F, Ophir J (1997) A least-squares strain estimator for elastography. Ultrasound Imaging 19:195208

    Google Scholar 

  15. Qian Z, Metaxas D, Axel L (2006) Extraction and tracking of MRI tagging sheets using a 3D Gabor filter bank. In: Proceeding of the international conference of the engineering in medicine and biology society

    Google Scholar 

  16. Qian Z, Montillo A, Metaxas D, Axel L (2003) Segmenting cardiac MRI tagging lines using Gabor filter banks. In: Proceeding of the international conference of the engineering in medicine and biology society, pp 630–633

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhen Qian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Qian, Z., Lee, WN., Konofagou, E.E., Metaxas, D.N., Axel, L. (2011). Registered 3D Tagged MRI and Ultrasound Myocardial Elastography: Quantitative Strain Comparison. In: El-Baz, A., Acharya U, R., Mirmehdi, M., Suri, J. (eds) Multi Modality State-of-the-Art Medical Image Segmentation and Registration Methodologies. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8195-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics