Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Cooperative Systems ((COSY,volume 2))

Abstract

Aircraft are one of the most complex vehicles especially when compared with other moving objects. As the motions of aircraft are three-dimensional and the gusty environment in which they fly generates disturbance forces, the control of such vehicles is difficult and requires complicated control systems. For ensuring a safe and successful flight, which includes take off, trimmed flight, flight maneuvering, and landing, most commercial and military aircraft are controlled by automatic flight control systems (AFCSs). In aircraft, such control systems employ multi-loop feedback to achieve several benefits (McLean, 1990):

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahmed-Zaid, F., Ioannou, P., Gousman, K. and Rooney, R. (1991). Accommodation of failures in the F16 aircraft using adaptive control, IEEE Control Systems Magazine, January: 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T. and Lee, P.A. (1981). Fault Tolerance Principles and Practice, Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashkenazi, A. and Bryson, A.E. (1982). Control logic for parameter insensitivity and disturbance attenuation, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, July–Aug.: 383–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basseville, M. and Benveniste, A. (Eds.), (1986). Detection of Abrupt Changes in Signals and Dynamics Systems. LNCIS No.77, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basseville, M. (1988). Detecting changes in signals and systems: A survey. Automatica, 24, No. 3:508–516.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Beard, R.V. (1971). Failure accommodation in linear systems through self-organization. PhD Thesis, Man Vehicle Lab., Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boullart, L, Krijgsman, A., and Vingerhoeds, R.A. (Eds) (1992). Application of Artificial Intelligence in Process Control, Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumback, B.D. and Srinath, M.D. (1987). A fault tolerant multi-sensor navigation system design. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. AES-23, No. 6: 738–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caglayan, A.K., Rahnamai, K. and Allen, S.M. (1988). Detection, Identification and Estimation of Surface Damage/Actuator Failure for High Performance Aircraft. Proc. on the American Control Conference (ACC), Atlanta USA: 2206–2212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen J. and Patton R.J., (1999). Robust Model-Based Fault Diagnosis for Dynamic Systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eide P. and Maybeck P.S. (1996). An MMAE failure detection system for the F-16. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 32, No.3: 1125–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, P.M. (1987). Fault diagnosis in dynamic systems via state estimation—A survey. In: System Fault Diagnostics, reliability and Related Knowledge-based Approaches (S. Tzafestas, M. Singh, and G. Schmidt Eds.), 1: 35–98. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, P.M. (1990). Fault diagnosis in dynamic systems using analytical and knowledge-based redundancy. A survey and some new results, Automatica, 26, No.3: 459–474.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gadzhiev (Hajiyev), Ch. M. (1992). Dynamic systems diagnosis based on Kalman filter updating sequences. Automation and Remote Control, No.l: 147–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadzhiev (Hajiyev), Ch. M. (1994). Check of the generalized variance of the Kalman filter updating sequence in dynamic diagnosis. Automation and Remote Control, Vol. 55, No.8: 1165–1169.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gertler, J.J. (1998). Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Engineering Systems. Marcel Dekker Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gertler, J.J. (1988). Survey of model based failure detection and isolation in complex plants. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, Dec: 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopinathan, M., Boskovic, J.D., Mehra, R.K. and Rago, C. (1998). A Multiple Model Predictive Scheme for Fault-Tolerant Flight Control Design. Proc. on the 37th IEEE Conference on Decision & Control, Tampa, Florida USA: 1376–1381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, M.M. and Yamakawa, T. (Eds.) (1988). Fuzzy Logic in Knowledge Based Systems, Decision and Control. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himmelblau, D.M. (1978). Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Chemical and Petrochemical Processes. Chemical Eng. Monograph 8, Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell W.E., W.T. Bundick, R.M. Hueschen, and A.J. Ostroff (1983). Restructurable Controls for Aircraft. AIAA Guidance and Control Conference, August, Gatlinburg: 646–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, R.R. and McCulloch, B. (1984). Self-repairing flight control system, Society of Automotive Engineers Inc. Aerospace Congress Exposition: 477–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou, P. and Rooney, R. (1989). Surface failure detection and evaluation of control law reconfiguration of flight control system. AIAA Guidance & Navigation Control Conf., Boston MA: 733–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isermann, R. (1984). Process fault detection based on modelling and estimation methods, A Survey, Automatica, 20: 387–404.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. (1992). Elementary Statistics. 6th ed. — PWS — KENT Publishing Company, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, H.L. (1973). Failure Detection in Linear Systems. PhD Thesis, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, September, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Looze D.P., Weiss, J.L., Eterno, J.S. and Barret, N.M. (1985). An automatic redesign approach for restructurable control systems. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, May: 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magill D.T. (1965). Optimal adaptive estimation of sampled stochastic processes. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC10, No.4: 434–439.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • McLean D. (1990). Automatic Flight Control Systems. Prentice Hall, UK.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • McLean D. and Aslam-Mir S. (1991). Reconfigurable flight control systems. International Conference on Contro1’91, 1,25–28 March: 234–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehra R.K. and Peschon, J. (1971). An innovations approach to fault detection and diagnosis in dynamic systems. Automatica, 7: 637–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menke, T.E. and Maybeck, P.S. (1995). Sensor/actuator failure detection in the vista F-16 by multiple model adaptive estimation. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 31, No.4: 1218–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyazawa Y. (1992). Robust flight control system design with multiple model approach. J. Guidance, 151, No.3: 785–788.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Moerder, D.D. and Halyo, N. (1989). Application of precomputed control laws in a reconfigurable aircraft flight control system. J. Guidance, 12, No.3: 325–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montoya, R.J., Howell, W.E., Bundick, W.T., Ostroff, A.J., Hueschen R.M. and Beicastro, C.M., ed. (1982). Restructurable controls, NASA CP 2277. Proceedings of a workshop held at NASA Langley Research Centrel, Hampton, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napolitano, M.R. and Swaim, R.L. (1991). New technique for aircraft flight control reconfiguration, J. Guidance, 14, No.1: 184–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Transportation Safety Board (1979). Aircraft Accident Report; American Airlines, Inc. DC10, Chicago O’Hare Int. Airport, NTSB-AAR-79-17, May: 23–24 and 54–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, V.P. (1990). Fault-tolerant computing: Fundamental concepts, IEEE Computer, July: 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochi, Y. and Kanai, K. (1991). Design of restructurable flight control systems using feedback linearization. J. Guidance 14, No.5: 903–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, R.J., Frank, P.M. and Clark, R.N., ed. (1989). Fault Diagnosis in Dynamic Systems, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, R.J. (1997). Fault tolerant control: The 1997 situation, IFAC Symposium on Fault Detection, Supervision, and Safety for Technical Processes, SAFEPROCESS’97, Hull, UK: 1033–1055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, Y., Youssouf, A., Arte, Ph. and Kinnaert, M. (1997). A complete procedure for residual generation and evaluation with application to a heat exchanger. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 5, No. 6: 542–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rago, C, Prasanth, R., Mehra, R.K. and Fortenbaugh, R. (1998). Failure Detection and Identification and Fault Tolerant Control using the IMM-KF with applications to the Eagle-Eye UAV. Proc. on the 37th IEEE Conference on Decision & Control, Tampa, Florida USA, December: 4208–4213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rattan, K.S. (1985a). Evaluation of control-mixer concept for reconfiguration of flight control systems. NAECON1, 2: 560–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rattan, K.S. (1985b). Reconfiguration of flight control systems after effector failure. Proc. of Fourth International Conference on Systems Engineering, Coventry Polytechnic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggins, R.N. and Ribbens, W.B. (1997). Designed inputs for detection and isolation of failures in the state transition matrices of dynamic systems. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 5, No.2: 143–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A.C. (1985). Totally robust control—A new concept for design of flight control systems. AIAA, August: 85–1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubertus, D.P. (1983). Self-repairing flight control systems overview. IEEE National Aero & Elec. Conference, May: 1280–1286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ, D.E. (1983). Reconfigurable digital control laws for the 7D digitac II aircraft with failed primary control surface. Proc. of Workshop on Multivariable Control Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sastry, S. and Bodson, M. (1989). Adaptive Control. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlee, F.H., Standish, C.L. and Toda, N.F. (1967). Divergence in the Kalman Filter.AIAA J.,V.5: 1114–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solodovnikov, V.V., ed. (1990). Automatic Design of Automatic Control Systems. Moscow, Masinostroveniye (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tahir, J.M., (1991). Parallel Processing for Fault Tolerant Aircraft Control. PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vepa, R. and Caliskan, F. (1991).Application of observers to monitoring, failure detection and fault diagnosis in aircraft flight control, Proc. of the IMechE, Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 1995,V.209: 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virk, G.S. and Tahir, J.M. (1991). A Fault Tolerant Optimal Flight Control System. Proc. on the International Conference on Control’ 91, Edinburgh, March: 1049–1055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willsky, A.S. (1976). A survey of design methods for failure detection systems. Automatica, 12:601–611.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hajiyev, C., Caliskan, F. (2003). Introduction. In: Fault Diagnosis and Reconfiguration in Flight Control Systems. Cooperative Systems, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9166-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9166-9_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4818-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9166-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics