Skip to main content

Cooperative Query Answering via Type Abstraction Hierarchy

  • Conference paper
CKBS ’90

Abstract

Cooperative query answering consists of analyzing the intent of the query and providing generalized, neighborhood or associated information relevant to the query. The key issues to accomplish cooperative query answering consist of supporting different knowledge representations at different abstract levels and providing inference between these levels. In this paper the Type Abstraction Hierarchy is proposed which is characterized by dealing with subtyping from subsumption, composition, and also abstraction views. Based on the type abstraction feature provided by this model, an inference technique for cooperative query answering is developed. Such an inference is performed by abstracting and refining the goal to generalize and specialize the query scope and to derive relevant answers with different generality, coverage, and approximation, or to link related subjects at certain levels by using different representations of knowledge given at different levels. A prototype system has been implemented at UCLA that demonstrates the use of this approach for such decision making and problem solving applications as conceptual query processing, neighborhood inference, and subject association.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Abiteboul, S. Grumbach, “Une Approche Logique de la Manipulation d’objets Complexes”, 3e Journees BD3, Port Camargue, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Ait-Kaci, “Type Subsumption as a Model of Computation”, in Expert Database Systems, Kersburg ed. 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Alashqur, S. Su and H. Lam, “A Rule-based Language for Deductive Object-Oriented Databases”, Proc. of the 6th International Conference on Data Engineering, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. BAN86] F. Bancilhon and S. Khoshafian, “A Calculus for Complex Objects”, Proc. PODS ‘86.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Banerjee “Data Model Issues for Object-Oriented Applications”, ACM Trans. on Office Information Systems, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  6. BEE86] C. Beeri et.al, “Sets and Negation in a Logic Database Language LDL1”, MCC Rep,1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Brodie, “On Modeling Behavioral Semantics of Databases”, Proc. of VLDB’81, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Brodie, J. Mylopoulos, J. Shmidt eds, “On Conceptual Modeling”, Springer-Verlag, NY, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Brodie. J. Mylopoulos eds, “On Knowledge Base Management Systems”, Springer-Verlag, NY, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Q. Chen and G. Gardarin, “An Implementation Model for Reasoning with Complex Objects”, Proc. of ACM-SIGMOD 88, USA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Zaniolo, “The Representation and Deductive Retrieval of Complex Objects”, Proc. VLDB 11, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. Cuppens and R. Demolombe, “Cooperative Answering: A Methodology to Provide Intelligent Access to Databases”, Proc. of the 2nd international conference on expert database systems, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Goguen et al, “Abstract Data Types as Initial Algebras and Correctness of Data Representations”, Proc. Conf. on Computer Graphics, Pattern Recognition and Data Structure.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Guttag, E. Horowitz and D. Musser, “Abstract Data Types and Software Validation”, CACM 21 (21), 1978.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Hammer and D. Mcleod, “The Semantic Database Model”, ACM Trans. Database Systems, 6 (3), 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. W. Kim, “A Model of Queries for Object-Oriented Databases”, Proc. of VLDB’ 89, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Smith and D.C.P. Smith, “Database Abstraction: Aggregation and Generalization”, ACM Trans. Database Systems 2 (2), 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Su, “SAM*: A Semantic Association Model for Corporate and Scientific-Statistical Databases”, Information Sciences 29, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Tsur and C. Zaniolo, “LDL: A Logic Based Data Language”, Proc. VLDB 12, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  20. C. Zaniolo, “The Representation and Deductive Retrieval of Complex Objects”, Proc. VLDB 11, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chu, W.W., Chen, Q., Lee, RC. (1991). Cooperative Query Answering via Type Abstraction Hierarchy. In: Deen, S.M. (eds) CKBS ’90. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1831-2_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1831-2_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-19649-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1831-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics