Skip to main content

A Hierarchical Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach for the Risk Assessment of Green Supply Chain Implementation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fuzzy Hierarchical Model for Risk Assessment

Abstract

Green supply chain management (GSCM) has emerged as an organisational philosophy in recent years. GSCM helps organisation and their business to improve competitive advantages and profits. Nevertheless, introducing new green initiatives might require the use of new technologies in supply and production processes, as well as the development of new quality systems. Purchasing-wise, it might need the procurement of new raw materials and affect the supplier selection process. Logistics-wise, it might require new inbound and outbound logistics along with new packaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Azevedo, S. G., Carvalho, H., & Machado, V. C. (2011). The influence of green practices on supply chain performance: a case study approach. Transportation Research Part E, 47, 850–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacallan, J. J. (2000). Greening the supply chain. Business and Environment, 6(5), 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bao, Q., Ruan, D., Shen, Y., Hermans, E., & Janssens, D. (2012). Improved hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS for road safety performance evaluation. Knowledge-Based Systems, 32, 84–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boran, F. E., Genc, S., Kurt, M., & Akay, D. (2009). A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for selection of supplier with TOPSIS method. Expert System with Applications, 36(8), 11363–11368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottani, E., & Rizzi, A. (2006). A fuzzy TOPSIS methodology to support outsourcing of logistics services. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(4), 294–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büyüközkan, G., & Çifçi, G. (2012). A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 3000–3011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamodrakas, I., Alexopoulou, N., & Martakos, D. (2009). Customer evaluation for order acceptance using a novel class of fuzzy methods based on TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 7409–7415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, F. T. S., & Chan, H. K. (2010). An AHP model for selection of suppliers in the fast changing fashion market. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 51(9–12), 1195–1207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, F. T. S., Chan, H. K., Lau, H. C. W., & Ip, R. W. L. (2006). Benchmarking logistics performance of the postal industry—a double AHP approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 13(6), 636–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C.-W., Wu, C.-R., Lin, C.-T., & Chen, H.-C. (2007). An application of AHP and sensitivity analysis for selecting the best slicing machine. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 52(2), 296–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. M., & Huang, P.-N. (2007). Bi-negotiation integrated AHP in suppliers selection. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 27(11), 1254–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. T., Linb, C. T., & Huang, S. F. (2005). A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 102(2), 289–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DaÄŸdeviren, D. (2008). Decision making in equipment selection: An integrated approach with AHP and PROMETHEE. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 19(4), 397–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ErtuÄŸrul, Ä°., & KarakaÅŸoÄŸlu, N. (2008). Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 39(7–8), 783–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, Y., Liu, Z., Hu, D., Zhang, L., & Gu, G. (2010). Selection of green product design scheme based on multi-attribute decision-making method. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 3(4), 277–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, D., & Ghobadian, A. (2009). An empirical study of green supply chain management practices amongst UK manufacturers. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 20(7), 933–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kahraman, C., Büyüközkan, G., & AteÅŸ, N. Y. (2007). A two phase multi-attribute decision-making approach for new product introduction. Information Sciences, 177, 1567–1582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelemenis, A., & Askounis, D. (2010). A new TOPSIS-based multi-criteria approach to personnel selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(7), 4999–5008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelemenis, A., Eragzakis, A., & Askounis, D. (2011). Support managers’ selection using an extension of fuzzy TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 2774–2782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korpela, J., Lehmusvaara, A., & Nisonen, J. (2007). Warehouse operator selection by combining AHP and DEA methodologies. International Journal of Production Economics, 108(1–2), 135–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krohling, R. A., & Campanharo, V. C. (2011). Fuzzy TOPSIS for group decision making: A case study for accidents with oil spill in the sea. Expert System with Applications, 38(4), 4190–4197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., & Kozar, K. A. (2006). Investigating the effect of website quality on e-business success: An analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1383–1401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, T. (2010). Applying TRIZ and AHP to develop innovative design for automated assembly systems. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 46, 301–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, L. Y. Y., Wu, C. H., & Kuo, T.-C. (2007). Environmental principles applicable to green supplier evaluation by using multi-objective decision analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18–19), 4317–4331.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, C. Y., & Chuah, K. B. (2010). Evaluation of eco design alternatives using fuzzy AHP methodology. Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal, 4(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peattie, K. (2001). Golden goose or wild goose? The hunt for the green consumer. Business Strategy and the Environment, 10(4), 187–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan, R. (2007). Supplier selection problem: integrating DEA with the approaches of total cost of ownership and AHP. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(4), 258–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, P., & Holt, D. (2005). Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance? International Journal of Operation and Production Management, 25(9), 898–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roghanian, E., Rahimi, J., & Ansari, A. (2010). Comparison of first aggregation and last aggregation in fuzzy group TOPSIS. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34(12), 3754–3766.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytical hierarchy process. Pittsburgh: RWS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis, J. (2003). A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(4), 397–409.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sarminento, R., & Thomas, A. (2010). Identifying improvement areas when implementing green initiatives using a multitier AHP approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 17(3), 452–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shang, K. C., Lu, C. S., & Li, S. (2010). A taxonomy of green supply chain management capability among electronic-related manufacturing firms in Taiwan. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 1218–1226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., & Agrawal, N. (2009). Selection of a pull production control policy under different demand situations for a manufacturing system by AHP-algorithm. Computers and Operations Research, 36(5), 1622–1632.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, S. K. (2007). Green supply-chain management: A state-of-the-art literature review. International Journal of Management Review, 9(1), 53–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vachon, S. (2007). Green supply chain practices and the selection of environmental technologies. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18), 4357–4379.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. M., & Elhag, T. M. S. (2006). Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, 31(2), 309–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Chan, H. K., Yee, W. Y., & Diaz-Rainey, I. (2012). A two-stage Fuzzy-AHP model for risk assessment of implementing green initiatives in the fashion supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 595–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, W., Chen, C.-H., Huang, Y., & Mi, W. (2008). An integration of bidding-oriented product conceptualization and supply chain formation. Computers in Industry, 59(2–3), 128–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C., Liu, T., Kao, C., & Wang, H. (2010). Integrating AHP and DELPHI methods to construct a green product assessment hierarchy for early stage of product design and development. International Journal of Operations Research, 7(3), 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yong, D. (2006). Plant location selection based on fuzzy TOPSIS. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 28, 839–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2004). Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Operations Management, 22(3), 265–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. (2007). Initiatives and outcomes of green supply chain management implementation by Chinese manufacturers. Journal of Environmental Management, 85(1), 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. (2008). Green supply chain management implications for ‘‘closing the loop’’. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 44(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hing Kai Chan .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chan, H.K., Wang, X. (2013). A Hierarchical Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach for the Risk Assessment of Green Supply Chain Implementation. In: Fuzzy Hierarchical Model for Risk Assessment. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5043-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5043-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5042-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5043-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics