Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Neovagina Formation with the Use of Bowel

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Female Genital Tract Congenital Malformations

  • 1517 Accesses

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this chapter is to present the technique of neovagina formation with the use of bowel for the treatment of women with vaginal aplasia, to review the post-operative functional results and to critically report its potential advantages and limitations. Brief description of the reviewed data: From 1992 to 2014, 88 women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome were referred to our gynecological surgery department for sigmoid vaginoplasty. Twenty-five were redirected toward vaginal dilation (Frank’s method), while 59 had laparatomic and the final four totally laparoscopic vaginoplasties. The surgical technique is described in detail. The functional and sexual outcomes of sigmoid vaginoplasty were assessed in 59 of them (48 treated with sigmoid vaginoplasty and 11 with vaginal dilation). Functional results and sexuality were evaluated with two standardized questionnaires: the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and the revised Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS-R). Questions were added to analyze depression, body image perception, and desire for motherhood. Forty patients (68 %) responded to the requested questionnaire and regular sexual intercourse was reported by 30 (73 %) of them. The mean total FSFI score was 28 ± 3.1 in the surgical group and 30 ± 5.3 in the group treated with the Frank method. Their mean FSDS-R scores were 21 ± 12.1 and 18 ± 13.8, respectively. Clinical implications: In view of this evidence, in patients who refused or had unsuccessful vaginal dilation, sigmoid vaginoplasty, performed by experienced specialists in gynecologic and gastrointestinal surgery, appears to be an attractive alternative, having rapid and satisfactory anatomical and sexual results. Open issues for further research: Sigmoid vaginoplasty is an effective technique providing nearly normal sexual function to women with vaginal aplasia. However, further studies are needed to identify women who might benefit from this technique. Furthermore, psychological distress related to sexuality persists in most patients and demonstrates the need for multidisciplinary support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sneguireff FW. Un cas d’établissement d’un vagin artificiel au moyen d’une nouvelle méthod opératoire. Arch de Tocnologie et de Gynaecologie. 1892;19:568–77.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baldwin JF. XIV. The formation of an artificial vagina by intestinal transplantation. Ann Surg. 1904;40(3):398–403.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Abd El-Aziz S. Vaginal reconstruction using the ileocecal segment after resection of pelvic malignancy. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2006;18(1):1–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Burger RA, Riedmiller H, Knapstein PG, Friedberg V, Hohenfellner R. Ileocecal vaginal construction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161(1):162–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Turner-Warwick R, Kirby RS. The construction and reconstruction of the vagina with the colocecum. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990;170(2):132–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Erman Akar M, Ozkan O, Ozkan O, Colak T, Gecici O. Sexual function and long-term results following vaginal reconstruction with free vascular jejunal flap. J Sex Med. 2013 Nov;10(11):2849–54.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schneider W, Nguyen-Thanh P, Dralle H, Mirastschijski U. Ileal J-pouch vaginoplasty: reconstruction of a physiologic vagina with an ileal J-pouch. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(6):694 e1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ACOG committee opinion. Nonsurgical diagnosis and management of vaginal agenesis. Number 274, July 2002. Committee on Adolescent Health Care. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;79(2):167–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. ACOG Committee on Adolescent Health Care. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 355: vaginal agenesis: diagnosis, management, and routine care. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(6):1605–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Committee on Adolescent Health Care. Committee opinion: no. 562: mullerian agenesis: diagnosis, management, and treatment. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(5):1134–7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haute Autorité De Santé (H.A.S). Aplasies utéro-vaginales. Protocole national de diagnostic et de soins pour les maladies rares octobre 2012. www.has-sante.fr.

  12. Frank R. The formation of an artificial vagina without operation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1938;35:1053–5.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Communal PH, Chevret-Measson M, Golfier F, Raudrant D. Sexuality after sigmoid colpopoiesis in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser Syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(3):600–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Carrard C, Chevret-Measson M, Lunel A, Raudrant D. Sexuality after sigmoid vaginoplasty in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2012 Mar;97(3):691–6.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Edmonds DK. Congenital malformations of the genital tract and their management. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;17(1):19–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Calcagno M, Pastore M, Bellati F, Plotti F, Maffucci D, Boni T, et al. Early prolapse of a neovagina created with self-dilatation and treated with sacrospinous ligament suspension in a patient with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome: a case report. Fertil Steril. 2010 Jan;93(1):267.e1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gatti C, Del Rossi C, Lombardi L, Caravaggi F, Casolari E, Casadio G. Sexuality and psychosocial functioning in young women after colovaginoplasty. J Urol. 2010 Oct;184(4 Suppl):1799–803.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cai B, Zhang JR, Xi XW, Yan Q, Wan XP. Laparoscopically assisted sigmoid colon vaginoplasty in women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome: feasibility and short-term results. BJOG. 2007;114(12):1486–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wiegel M, Meston C, Rosen R. The female sexual function index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. J Sex Marital Ther. 2005;31(1):1–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Derogatis LR, Rosen R, Leiblum S, Burnett A, Heiman J. The Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS): initial validation of a standardized scale for assessment of sexually related personal distress in women. J Sex Marital Ther. 2002;28(4):317–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Derogatis L, Clayton A, Lewis-D’Agostino D, Wunderlich G, Fu Y. Validation of the female sexual distress scale-revised for assessing distress in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. J Sex Med. 2008;5(2):357–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Khen-Dunlop N, Lortat-Jacob S, Thibaud E, Clement-Ziza M, Lyonnet S, Nihoul-Fekete C. Rokitansky syndrome: clinical experience and results of sigmoid vaginoplasty in 23 young girls. J Urol. 2007;177(3):1107–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Roberts CP, Haber MJ, Rock JA. Vaginal creation for mullerian agenesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(6):1349–52; discussion 52–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ismail-Pratt IS, Bikoo M, Liao LM, Conway GS, Creighton SM. Normalization of the vagina by dilator treatment alone in Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome and Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser Syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(7):2020–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Giannesi A, Marchiole P, Benchaib M, Chevret-Measson M, Mathevet P, Dargent D. Sexuality after laparoscopic Davydov in patients affected by congenital complete vaginal agenesis associated with uterine agenesis or hypoplasia. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(10):2954–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Frontino G, Fontana E, Restelli E, Bruni V. The laparoscopic Vecchietti’s modified technique in Rokitansky syndrome: anatomic, functional, and sexual long-term results. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(4):377 e1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fotopoulou C, Sehouli J, Gehrmann N, Schoenborn I, Lichtenegger W. Functional and anatomic results of amnion vaginoplasty in young women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2010 Jun;94(1):317–23.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Darai E, Soriano D, Thoury A, Bouillot JL. Neovagina construction by combined laparoscopic-perineal sigmoid colpoplasty in a patient with Rokitansky syndrome. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002;9(2):204–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Darai E, Toullalan O, Besse O, Potiron L, Delga P. Anatomic and functional results of laparoscopic-perineal neovagina construction by sigmoid colpoplasty in women with Rokitansky’s syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(11):2454–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Berman L, Berman J, Miles M, Pollets D, Powell JA. Genital self-image as a component of sexual health: relationship between genital self-image, female sexual function, and quality of life measures. J Sex Marital Ther. 2003;29 Suppl 1:11–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Labus LD, Djordjevic ML, Stanojevic DS, Bizic MR, Stojanovic BZ, Cavic TM. Rectosigmoid vaginoplasty in patients with vaginal agenesis: sexual and psychosocial outcomes. Sex Health. 2011 Sep;8(3):427–30.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Laggari V, Diareme S, Christogiorgos S, Deligeoroglou E, Christopoulos P, Tsiantis J, et al. Anxiety and depression in adolescents with polycystic ovary syndrome and Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;30(2):83–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Heller-Boersma JG, Schmidt UH, Edmonds DK. Psychological distress in women with uterovaginal agenesis (Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser Syndrome, MRKH). Psychosomatics. 2009;50(3):277–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gynecological and Oncological Surgery, Lyon South Hospital Center, University Lyon I, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France

    Daniel Raudrant MD & Caroline Carrard

  2. Department of General and Surgical Oncology, Lyon South Hospital Center, University Lyon I, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France

    Eddy Cotte

Authors
  1. Daniel Raudrant MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Caroline Carrard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eddy Cotte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Raudrant MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Medical School, Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Grigoris F. Grimbizis

  2. Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Genk Institute for Fertility Technology, Leuven, Belgium

    Rudi Campo

  3. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Medical School, Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Basil C. Tarlatzis

  4. Leuven Institute for Fertility & Embryology, Leuven, Belgium

    Stephan Gordts

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Raudrant, D., Carrard, C., Cotte, E. (2015). Neovagina Formation with the Use of Bowel. In: Grimbizis, G., Campo, R., Tarlatzis, B., Gordts, S. (eds) Female Genital Tract Congenital Malformations. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5146-3_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5146-3_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5145-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5146-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation