Abstract
Respiratory diagnoses continue to make up a large number of admissions to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), most notably lower respiratory infections including pneumonia. This chapter will focus on pediatric community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), immunocompromised pneumonia, and aspiration pneumonia.
The pathogenesis for developing pneumonia varies; it can occur by direct inhalation of infectious particles in the air or aspiration, direct extension from the upper airways, and hematogenous spread. There are multiple levels of defense against pathogen invasion including anatomic barriers, as well as innate and adaptive immunity, which may be compromised in PICU patients.
The etiologies of pediatric pneumonia vary depending on age, host condition, and environmental factors like time of year and location. Viruses remain the most common form of lower respiratory tract infection in children, especially in neonates. Community-acquired bacterial pneumonia continues to be most prevalent in younger children as well, most often affecting children less than 5 years of age who are otherwise healthy. Despite immunizations and public health initiatives, the most common bacterial causes of CAP have remained largely unchanged over the last several decades and include: Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae (including non-typable strains) and Moraxella catarrhalis. Pulmonary infection in an immunocompromised host provides a much broader differential and must be aggressively treated without delay.
This chapter will also address various imaging modalities and typical findings with pediatric pneumonia. Methods for pathogen identification are broad and range from non-specific markers of illness to invasive techniques for culture. The mainstay of therapy continues to be antibiotics tailored to the patient and presumed etiology; more novel therapies may include corticosteroids or macrolide antibiotics for immune modulation. In those patients with pneumonia with effusion or empyema, drainage therapies with thoracostomy tubes or a VATS procedure may be indicated.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Introduction
Respiratory diagnoses continue to make up a large number of admissions to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) [1]. Lower respiratory tract infections are considered to be any infection beneath the anatomic level of the vocal cords, including bronchitis, bronchiolitis, tracheitis, and pneumonia [2]. Pneumonia remains an important cause of pediatric morbidity and mortality. There are nearly two million pneumonia-related deaths worldwide each year among children 5 years of age and younger [3, 4]. In the U.S., pneumonia causes over three million outpatient visits and more than 150,000 hospitalizations each year [5, 6]. In the developed world, early recognition and availability of antimicrobial therapies and respiratory support have lessened the mortality of pneumonia, but its morbidities remain. While widespread use of the heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in 2000 was associated with fewer pneumonia-associated complications in infants <1 year of age, complications remained unchanged or increased in school-age children and adolescents [5]. Thus, despite our best efforts at prevention through vaccination, morbidities continue to plague our patients and pneumonia remains a common cause of pediatric hospital admission.
This chapter will focus on pediatric community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), immunocompromised pneumonia, and aspiration pneumonia. Hospital acquired pneumonia is an important type of lower respiratory infection found in the PICU, but it is discussed extensively in the chapter on Hospital-acquired Infections elsewhere in this textbook. The definition of pneumonia is generally accepted to be a lower respiratory illness with fever, respiratory symptoms including tachypnea, and often, radiologic evidence of parenchymal infiltrates [7]. The World Health Organization (WHO) has defined pneumonia solely based on clinical findings due to the lack of radiologic studies in many parts of the world [8].
Definition of Pneumonia and Guidelines for Admission to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
Determining the type of pneumonia can help guide clinical management. Previously healthy children presenting with the signs and symptoms of a lower respiratory tract infection are generally considered to have CAP. Aspiration involves inhaling foreign material beyond the vocal cords, often causing aspiration pneumonitis (chemical pneumonitis) or pneumonia (an infectious process secondary to the aspiration) [9, 10]. Commonly aspirated materials in children include oropharyngeal secretions, gastric contents, water, hydrocarbon, lipid, and foreign bodies [11]. Guidelines for admission to the ICU are available for both young children and adults, and are summarized in Table 6.1 [12, 13].
Pathogenesis
Pneumonia can occur by direct inhalation of infectious particles in the air or aspiration, direct extension from the upper airways, and hematogenous spread. Anatomic and cellular protection serves as the first line of defense against potential pathogens. Airway mucus traps inhaled toxins and microbes and helps to transport them up and out of the respiratory tract via ciliary beating and cough, a mechanism referred to clinically as mucociliary clearance [14]. When the microbe burden or virulence of the organism surpasses the abilities of these simple mechanical protections, the innate immune response is activated. The innate immunity is responsible for immediate recognition and control of microbial invasion. In mammals, conserved receptors enable rapid recognition of pathogens to begin elimination of the infection as well as initiate the adaptive immune response. Activating the innate immune receptors in the airway epithelium leads to mobilization and activation of dendritic cells, T cells, and B cells that amplify antigen recognition, antibody production, and further cellular recruitment and inflammation [15]. The specifics of these interactions and signaling cascades are beyond the scope of this chapter, but are further discussed in other chapters within this text.
The lower respiratory tract remains generally clear of pathogens [2]. The mechanisms by which microbes are able to overwhelm defensive measures and result in pneumonia vary and depend on host conditions. The most common mechanism of pathogen entry is via inhalation of infectious particles, particularly in the case of specific organisms that spread via respiratory droplets such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Many viruses that cause lower respiratory tract infections are also spread utilizing aerosolized modes of transmission, including respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), influenza, and rhinoviruses. Due to their smaller size compared with bacteria, viruses consolidate more efficiently on smaller particles [16, 17]. Hematogenous spread results in pneumonia when bacteria in the bloodstream directly deposit in lung tissue.
Pulmonary aspiration can occur as a result of swallowing dysfunction, gastroesophageal reflux, anatomic anomalies such as tracheoesophageal fistulas, or an inability to protect the airway from oropharyngeal secretions. In the PICU, many patients have neurologic diseases that coexist with one, if not several, of these aforementioned mechanisms. Furthermore, impaired consciousness, as may occur with head injury, intoxication, sedation, and tracheal intubation, can also impair the ability to protect the airway, diminish the cough reflex, and exploit the patency of the anatomical connection between the larynx and trachea [9, 10, 18]. Direct aspiration of a large inoculum of infectious organisms can result when there is impairment of the host’s anatomic defense, usually the gag and cough reflex. This most commonly occurs in children with profound neurologic impairment or during tracheal intubation [19, 20].
Etiologies
Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Viruses still remain the most common cause of lower respiratory tract infection, especially in infants [21]. The occurrence of primary viral infections and co-infections with bacterial pneumonia are receiving more attention in recent years due to advances in detection methods to improve the reliability and sensitivity in diagnosis [22]. Viruses have been found in approximately 50 % of sampled patients with a range of 43–67 %, although this prevalence is difficult to compare across studies that utilize different identification techniques [22–28]. The most commonly noted infectious viruses were rhinovirus, human bocavirus, human metapneumovirus (hMPV), and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Human metapneumovirus causes significant respiratory infection, accounting for 5–8 % of viral pneumonia cases [29, 30]. Human bocavirus, first described in 2005, is detected in up to 10 % of children with respiratory infections [31]. However, co-infection with another virus occurs in more than half of human bocavirus infected children, making its role as a predominant respiratory pathogen unclear. One possible explanation for the high prevalence of viral co-infection with human bocavirus is that this virus is shed in respiratory tract secretions for a longer period of time than other viruses [32–34]. Other important respiratory tract pathogens include adenovirus, parainfluenza viruses, and influenza A or B, all of which vary in prevalence based on season and epidemic periods.
The most common complication of viral pneumonia is a secondary bacterial infection. Bacterial co-infection occurs in about 15–33 % of pediatric patients hospitalized with a lower respiratory tract infection [23]. The most often occurring combination was rhinovirus and Streptococcus pneumoniae, though it remains difficult to interpret the causal role of rhinovirus in lower respiratory tract infections [23, 25]. RSV remains an important cause of bronchiolitis in infants and can often progress to pneumonia. A recent study noted that 40 % of children admitted to the PICU with RSV bronchiolitis had bacterial co-infection [35].
Community-acquired bacterial pneumonia continues to be most prevalent in younger children as well, most often affecting children less than 5 years of age who are otherwise healthy. Despite immunizations and public health initiatives, the most common bacterial causes of CAP have remained largely unchanged over the last several decades and include: Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae (including non-typable strains) and Moraxella catarrhalis [7, 8, 21, 23]. In developing countries, other bacterial and viral etiologies must be considered, including Mycobacterium tuberculosis, H. influenzae type b (in unvaccinated areas of the world), and the measles virus [8].
In infants under 3–4 weeks of life, the most common etiologic agents include Group B Streptococcus, Listeria monocytogenes, and Gram-negative enteric bacteria. Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydophila pneumoniae (formerly Chlamydia pneumoniae), once considered to occur primarily among adolescents and young adults, are increasing being recognized as a cause of CAP in younger children, including those less than 5 years of age [21].
Immunocompromised Pneumonia
There are many causes of immunodeficiency in pediatrics including congenital, acquired (HIV/AIDS), or iatrogenic (during chemotherapy or after solid organ or stem cell transplant). These states can result in deficiencies in humoral immunity, cellular immunity, and neutrophil availability or function, making the host susceptible to not only typical pneumonia etiologies, but many opportunistic agents. Thus, the approach to an immunocompromised patient must be altered to consider the type and severity of immunodeficiency, as well as the temporal pattern after chemotherapy or transplant. Other considerations that are important in immunocompromised patients include neutropenia, where a low white blood cell count can hinder the patient’s ability to exhibit CXR findings and the lack of inflammation can alter the clinical presentation, and environmental factors and exposures that can cause geographic and temporal clustering of pathogens [11].
The causes of pneumonia following solid organ and stem cell transplant may follow a predictable temporal relationship. In the early post-transplant period (<1 month), infections from nosocomial or iatrogenic sources are most common. In the middle post-transplant period (1–6 months), donor-associated and opportunistic infections, including reactivation of latent infections, predominate; specific causes include Cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) or Human Herpes Virus 6 (HHV6). Late post-transplant period (>6 months) etiologies include community-acquired infections as well as infections associated with profound immunosuppression [36, 37]. In an effort to diminish the risk associated with post-transplant immunosuppression, immunosuppressive agents (e.g., calcineurin inhibitors, high-dose corticosteroids) are used sparingly when possible and most protocols include anti-viral (especially CMV), anti-fungal, and Pneumocystis jiroveci (PCP) prophylaxis [36]. Still, many common infections continue to pose a great risk. For example, viral infections (e.g., RSV, influenza, adenovirus) cause greater virulence following solid organ or stem cell transplantation immediately after transplant when cellular immunity is profoundly low. Later in the course of transplantation, fungi such as Aspergillus spp. and Candida spp. become more prevalent causes of pneumonia with long-term steroid therapy [11, 37]. Thus, when a pulmonary process is suspected, aggressive treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics, antifungals, and antivirals must be employed. Immunocompromised patients with pulmonary infiltrates may rapidly progress to respiratory failure and, thus, often require ICU care. Infection must be aggressively treated without delay, but other conditions must also be sought including pulmonary hemorrhage, malignancy, idiopathic pneumonitis, or cardiac disease [11, 38].
Aspiration Pneumonia
The clinical presentation of aspiration pneumonitis or pneumonia can vary and like other pneumonia etiologies, aspiration can result in acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) manifested by severe pulmonary inflammation and alveolar-capillary permeability injury. It is estimated that approximately one-third of patients with aspiration pneumonitis develop ALI/ARDS [39]. Etiologies of aspiration pneumonia depend if the aspiration is community acquired or hospital acquired. Bacteriologic studies in aspiration patients have shown that community acquired aspiration pneumonias are generally the same bacterium as CAP, including H. influenzae, S. pneumoniae, S. aureus, and enterobacteriaceae species. In those patients who aspirated in a hospital setting, the most common organisms cultured were gram-negative enteric bacteria including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. These recent studies failed to grow any anaerobic organisms, refuting the prior studies that endorsed anaerobes as common etiologies [10].
Diagnostic Approach
Imaging
The role for imaging in pediatric pneumonia is to detect the presence of pneumonia, determine the location and extent, and identify complications such as effusion or empyema. Modalities include chest radiographs (CXR), ultrasound (US), and computed tomography (CT) [11]. The presence of an infiltrate on CXR, combined with clinical and other laboratory findings can aid in the diagnosis of pneumonia. However, these modalities are not sufficiently sensitive or specific to reliably differentiate between viral, bacterial, and atypical bacterial causes [40]. The main use for US is to identify and characterize a parapneumonic effusion or empyema and provide image guidance for chest tube placement. This modality is limited by availability of equipment and operators. Chest CT is helpful to further evaluate difficult cases, particularly immunocompromised children with ill-defined infiltrates on CXR, complex empyema or effusion, or recurrent or chronic pneumonia [11]. Imaging findings in pneumonia can be non-specific, but when combined with other factors such as patient age, immune status, and historical information, they may help to narrow the differential diagnosis.
In viral pneumonia, the most common findings are bilateral symmetrical parahilar and bronchial opacities with or without atelectasis and air trapping; pleural effusions are rare (Fig. 6.1). This is in contrast to bronchopneumonia, a form of bacterial pneumonia that begins as peribronchiolar inflammation and spreads to the lung parenchyma. Bacterial pneumonia is characterized by consolidation and filling of the alveolar air spaces with exudate, inflammation, and fibrin. Bronchopneumonia is typical of many bacteria including S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, S. aureus, and Gram-negative enteric bacteria. The CXR often reveals fluffy lobar consolidation or diffuse bilateral opacities extending peripherally, with or without associated pleural effusion. In aspiration pneumonia, the CXR may reveal ground-glass or consolidative opacities predominantly involving the middle and lower (dependent) lobes [41]. Finally, atypical pneumonia etiologies include Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pneumoniae and, less commonly, Legionella species. The CXR findings for these atypical causes are varied. Diffuse interstitial infiltrates are characteristic though other findings include lobar consolidation, small bilateral pleural effusions, perihilar and peribronchial opacities that resemble butterfly wings, or a bi-lobar reticular pattern (Fig. 6.2) [42, 43].
The etiology of pneumonia in the immunocompromised patient can be difficult to determine though further imaging can help elucidate the cause. Respiratory failure in an immunocompromised child frequently necessitates a chest CT to better visualize the pattern and extent of disease, aid in diagnosis of the etiology, determine the need for more invasive procedures, and to increase the sensitivity of assessing treatment response [11]. Fungal infections are more difficult to diagnose; classic findings include pulmonary nodules on chest CT (Fig. 6.3).
Non-invasive Pathogen Identification
The “gold standard” diagnosis of pneumonia is microbiological identification of a pathogen from the lower respiratory tract [2]. Obtaining a LRT specimen can be difficult, especially in children, as it may require an invasive procedure and can be contaminated with oropharyngeal bacteria. Most children younger than 8 years of age cannot produce a sufficient sputum sample, defined as <10 squamous or epithelial cells and >25 polymorphonuclear white blood cells per low power field. Therefore, most samples are obtained through either an endotracheal tube via aspiration or bronchoalveolar lavage [44].
Other laboratory tests helpful in identifying the causative agent in CAP can include blood cultures, viral polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests, and bacterial serologies. Commonly used diagnostic methods available for an individual microorganism may be found in Table 6.2 [8]. The clinician may also be limited by the capabilities of the laboratory in their institution for performing these tests.
Because of the difficulties in determining the etiology of pneumonia, non-microbiologic approaches have been sought to differentiate serious bacterial infections from nonbacterial pneumonia [21]. Many studies have evaluated markers including serum C-reactive protein (CRP), blood white cell count (WBC), serum procalcitonin (PCT), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), attempting to find a test, or combination of tests, that would differentiate viral pneumonia from serious bacterial pneumonia necessitating antibiotic therapy [8, 45–49]. All of the aforementioned tests have limited utility in reliably differentiating viral from bacterial pneumonia, but when one or more of the markers are significantly elevated, a bacterial etiology is more likely. Thus, taken together with the clinical examination and radiologic findings, these tests can aid the clinician in deciding which patients require antibiotic therapy. PCT levels appear to be more sensitive than WBC, ESR, and CRP in identifying children with bacterial pneumonia and have been used to identify children who may benefit from a longer duration of antibiotic therapy [50].
Invasive Pathogen Identification
When non-invasive identification techniques are inadequate, or when identifying the cause is especially important, such as when treating an immunocompromised host, invasive diagnostic procedures may be necessary. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is the preferred diagnostic procedure in an immunocompromised host with an unknown pathogen [51]. The sensitivity for diagnosis varies and depends on the host, pathogen, and the post-collection microbiologic detection methods employed. While many atypical organisms may be difficult to culture, P. jiroveci and Mycobacterium infections are more easily detected in BAL because of high organism burden in the lungs. The diagnosis of aspiration pneumonia is mainly clinical, often based on historical or witnessed events or conditions, and thus can be difficult to ascertain. If a BAL is performed in suspected aspiration, the presence of lipid-laden macrophages can help diagnose the aspiration of lipophilic foods such as formula [52]. A lipid-laden macrophage index can be obtained using the oil red O stain and when high, can be very sensitive and specific for aspiration [53].
Other invasive procedures include transbronchial biopsy if diffuse infiltrates are present but the BAL is negative, or CT-guided needle biopsy of a focal lesion. The improved diagnosis with these invasive procedures must be balanced against the risks to critically ill patients [54]. Important non-infectious etiologies to rule out with these invasive procedures include lung rejection (if transplanted), post-engraftment syndrome, idiopathic pneumonitis, graft versus host disease, and bronchiolitis obliterans.
General Treatment Principles
Antimicrobial Therapy
Children with severe pneumonia requiring admission to the PICU are likely to receive intravenous antimicrobial therapy even if only until the possibility of bacterial infection can be excluded. In critically ill children with respiratory failure from pneumonia, prompt initiation of broad-spectrum antimicrobials is crucial. One study in pediatric patients with CAP showed that longer delays in receipt of antibiotics were independently associated with adverse outcomes [55]. However, antibiotic resistance is increasing and the principles of appropriate antibiotic utilization must be adhered to: use of drug with narrowest spectrum, aiming for high tissue penetration, short half-life, and abiding to a short, intense duration of therapy [7]. The duration of therapy is typically 7–14 days, with 10 days being the best studied. A 7-day course may be reasonable in non-severe cases of pneumonia [12]. The choice of antimicrobial agent is based on many things including the patient’s age, the type of pneumonia, and clinical and epidemiologic factors. Recent guidelines published by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America offer guidance for empiric antibiotic selection in children hospitalized with CAP (Table 6.3) [12].
Anti-inflammatory Therapy
Pneumonia causes a profound inflammatory response in the lungs and it has long been postulated that regulating this inflammation with steroid therapy may help to modulate local tissue damage and accelerate recovery for the patient. In addition, steroids are frequently utilized in other pulmonary inflammatory conditions such as reactive airway disease (RAD) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [56]. The inflammatory responses in pneumonia and ARDS are similar with increases in pro-inflammatory cytokines concurrent with illness severity; severe pneumonia can often progress to acute lung injury (ALI) or ARDS [57–59]. While preclinical data support the use of steroids, current studies have not demonstrated a reduction in mortality among corticosteroid recipients compared with non-recipients. Several trials, however, have shown some secondary benefits of steroids, including reduced length of hospital stay and reduced inflammatory markers [60, 61]. In contrast, a multi-center, retrospective cohort study using administrative data found that among patients not receiving concomitant beta-agonist therapy (used as a proxy for wheezing), corticosteroid recipients had a longer LOS and higher readmission rate compared with non-recipients [62]. At present, the lack of high quality data supporting the efficacy of corticosteroids prevents the recommendation for the use of steroids in most patients with severe pneumonia. However, corticosteroids may provide benefit to certain subgroups of patients such as those with acute onset of wheezing and those who meet the criteria for ALI/ARDS [59].
Macrolide antibiotics have important anti-microbial as well as anti-inflammatory properties, though the relative importance of these two mechanisms in children with pneumonia is unknown. In adult studies, macrolides have recently been touted for their immunomodulatory effects and clinical benefit in multiple chronic pulmonary conditions such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and cystic fibrosis (CF). The specific immunomodulatory effects are vast and include inhibition of intracellular signaling to suppress the production of transcription factors such as NF-κB and decrease production of inflammatory cytokines that recruit neutrophils [63, 64]. Several recent studies in adult patients with severe CAP and sepsis have shown a benefit in survival in patients treated with macrolide antibiotics in addition to the recommended antibiotics based on pathogen [63, 65–68]. The role of macrolides in children with pneumonia is unclear. In pediatrics, several small retrospective studies have shown that among children with atypical CAP, those treated with macrolides were less likely to have persistence of signs and symptoms after 3 days of therapy [69, 70]. Among children with M. pneumoniae infection, Lu et al. found a shorter duration of fever among macrolide recipients compared with non-recipients [71]. Finally, a large multi-center study of 690 patients with M. pneumoniae infection defined by discharge diagnosis codes, the median length of hospital stay was 3 days (interquartile range, 2–6 days); macrolide recipients had a 32 % shorter length of stay compared with non-recipients [72].
Complications
Empyema and Effusion
Pneumonia-associated complications such as empyema affect 7.5–15 % of children hospitalized with pneumonia [5, 73–76]. The progression from simple parapneumonic effusion to empyema occurs in stages that represent a continuous spectrum (Table 6.4) [77]. In the first stage, there is a rapid influx of exudative fluid into the pleural space as a result of increased pulmonary interstitial fluid traversing the pleura and an increase in vascular permeability due to pro-inflammatory cytokines. The pleural fluid is marked by the absence of bacteria, fluid pH >7.20, normal glucose, and LDH <3 times the upper limit of normal. At this stage, drainage is not generally required for resolution but if the effusion becomes large and impairs respiratory mechanics, drainage might become necessary. The fluid in the pleural space can flow freely and often layers along the lateral chest wall in decubitus films or along the posterior chest wall in supine films [37, 78] (Fig. 6.4a, b). If left untreated, exudative effusions can progress to fibropurulent effusions characterized by the new presence of bacteria or positive microbial cultures. Cellular lysis and phagocytosis in the fluid can result in pH < 7.20, higher LDH, and low glucose. Loculations begin to develop, causing these effusions to now be referred to as “complicated.” A chest radiograph may be difficult to interpret with respect to evidence of complicated effusions. Thoracic US is more accurate than chest radiographs in distinguishing simple from complicated pleural effusions. Complicated effusions are associated with floating debris and echogenic material or septations. Ultrasound is also useful in guiding pleural aspiration and drainage. Chest computed tomography (CT) may be indicated to better define pulmonary and pleural anatomy. Thickening of the parietal pleura on a contrasted CT scan is suggestive of empyema, even if the effusions are small in size (Fig. 6.4c). Finally, stage three is the organizing phase where fibroblasts grow into the pleural space and eventually results in a pleural peel, restricting chest mechanics. This stage often necessitates surgical decortication, especially if there is restrictive impairment [78].
The typical organisms responsible for the development of an empyema include S. pneumoniae and S. aureus. Pleural fluid cultures identify an organism in only 20–30 % of children with empyema. Blood cultures are positive in 13–30 % of children with empyema [79–82]. S. aureus is most often identified in pleural fluid culture. However, molecular identification techniques reveal that most culture-negative cases are attributable to S. pneumoniae [83, 84]. Regardless of the type of effusion present, antibiotic coverage based on treatment guidelines for pneumonia are essential. A recent study on the impact of early antibiotic therapy on the laboratory analysis of pleural fluid found that pre-treatment significantly hindered a bacterial diagnosis but did not alter the biochemical parameters of the fluid [85]. However, delaying antibiotic treatment for a thoracentesis would not be recommended in a critically ill child with respiratory failure secondary to pneumonia.
The treatment of complicated effusions and empyema remains controversial but recent studies have better defined protocols. A complete list of the available treatments for effusions and empyema is found in Table 6.5. Small, uncomplicated pleural effusions do not routinely require drainage. Moderate or large pleural effusions as well as those with evidence of septations or loculations usually require drainage. The medical options include appropriate antimicrobials and chest tube insertion with or without fibrinolytic therapy. Surgical options include video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or open thoracotomy and decortication. Recent guidelines concluded that chest tube drainage with the addition of fibrinolytic agents and VATS are equivalent methods of treatment and emphasize the importance of local expertise in determining the optimal approach for individual patients [12, 86]. VATS has gained popularity over conservative medical therapy as a way to directly visualize the pleural space, mechanically disrupt the adhesions, and strategically place the chest tube for optimal drainage [73, 87]. The higher cost and risk of anesthesia with VATS must be balanced against the more frequent requirement for additional drainage procedures for those undergoing primary chest tube placement. Thoracotomy and decortication are rarely needed.
The argument of medical management versus surgical management remains controversial. To date, at least two prospective trials in pediatrics have been completed directly comparing these methods. Both trials failed to show any outcome superiority with surgical management [80, 88]. Certainly children who have a very high white blood cell count in their pleural fluid (> 15,000), poor output drainage by chest tube, low pleural pH, the presence of bacteria in the pleural fluid and/or bloodstream, or failure of medical therapy alone may benefit from early VATS [86]. Patients who underwent VATS required fewer additional drainage procedures, but had no difference in hospital length of stay [74]. However, one study of adults with empyema found that patients treated with a combination of tPA and recombinant human DNase required fewer surgical interventions and had a shorter length of hospital stay [89]. Cost-effectiveness, balance of risks, and availability of resources also plays a role in considerations for surgical management. A comparison of multiple strategies for pediatric empyema noted that the most cost effective method was insertion of a chest tube with fibrinolytic therapy [90].
Lung Abscess
Abscesses develop in localized areas of parenchymal infection that becomes necrotic and cavitates (Fig. 6.5a, b). Primary lung abscesses can develop either in previously healthy children or in children with underlying lung disease such as congenital cystic lesions, cystic fibrosis, or immunodeficiency. Mechanisms for abscess development can include direct aspiration of infectious material, embolic phenomena, hematogenous spread from septicemia, or local extension from abdominal or oropharyngeal processes. The most common organisms include Gram-positive bacteria such as streptococci, Staphylococcus aureus or anaerobes. Most abscesses resolve with intravenous antibiotics alone, but aspiration or drainage with a pigtail catheter may be necessary [37].
Prevention
Vaccines against specific bacteria that predominantly cause pneumonia in children, specifically pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV-7) and H. influenzae vaccine (Hib) have drastically lowered the prevalence of infections causes by these strains. Since the introduction of PCV-7, several studies have documented its efficacy, and the decrease in cases of H. influenzae are equally striking [7, 21]. However, while PCV-7 has decreased the prevalence of invasive pneumococcal disease, the incidence of empyema is rising, the reason for which is unclear [76]. The licensure of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines that include even more serotypes (e.g., 13-valent) may further change the epidemiology of childhood pneumonia. Other vaccines, such as for measles (MMR) and influenza, can also aid to reduce these viral infections that so commonly lead to secondary bacterial pneumonia. While vaccines appear to be our greatest effort toward preventing pneumonia in children, more work needs to be done to increase their microbial coverage and availability throughout the world.
References
Namachivayam P, et al. Three decades of pediatric intensive care: who was admitted, what happened in intensive care, and what happened afterward. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010;11(5):549–55.
Langley JM, Bradley JS. Defining pneumonia in critically ill infants and children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005;6(3 Suppl):S9–13.
Pneumonia. Media Centre, World Health Organization (WHO). 2012. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs331/en/. Accessed 21 Sept 2012.
Mulholland K. Childhood pneumonia mortality–a permanent global emergency. Lancet. 2007;370(9583):285–9.
Lee GE, et al. National hospitalization trends for pediatric pneumonia and associated complications. Pediatrics. 2010;126(2):204–13.
Kronman MP, et al. Ambulatory visit rates and antibiotic prescribing for children with pneumonia, 1994–2007. Pediatrics. 2011;127(3):411–8.
Ranganathan SC, Sonnappa S. Pneumonia and other respiratory infections. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2009;56(1):135–56. xi.
McIntosh K. Community-acquired pneumonia in children. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(6):429–37.
Healy F, Panitch HB. Pulmonary complications of pediatric neurological diseases. Pediatr Ann. 2010;39(4):216–24.
Marik PE. Aspiration pneumonitis and aspiration pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(9):665–71.
Eslamy HK, Newman B. Pneumonia in normal and immunocompromised children: an overview and update. Radiol Clin North Am. 2011;49(5):895–920.
Bradley JS, et al. The management of community-acquired pneumonia in infants and children older than 3 months of age: clinical practice guidelines by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53(7):e25–76.
Mandell LA, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44 Suppl 2:S27–72.
Fahy JV, Dickey BF. Airway mucus function and dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(23):2233–47.
Kato A, Schleimer RP. Beyond inflammation: airway epithelial cells are at the interface of innate and adaptive immunity. Curr Opin Immunol. 2007;19(6):711–20.
Gralton J, et al. The role of particle size in aerosolised pathogen transmission: a review. J Infect. 2011;62(1):1–13.
Lindsley WG, et al. Distribution of airborne influenza virus and respiratory syncytial virus in an urgent care medical clinic. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(5):693–8.
de Benedictis FM, Carnielli VP, de Benedictis D. Aspiration lung disease. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2009;56(1):173–90. xi.
Levine SA, Niederman MS. The impact of tracheal intubation on host defenses and risks for nosocomial pneumonia. Clin Chest Med. 1991;12(3):523–43.
Trier E, Thomas AG. Feeding the disabled child. Nutrition. 1998;14(10):801–5.
Stein RT, Marostica PJ. Community-acquired pneumonia: a review and recent advances. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2007;42(12):1095–103.
Cilla G, et al. Viruses in community-acquired pneumonia in children aged less than 3 years old: high rate of viral coinfection. J Med Virol. 2008;80(10):1843–9.
Honkinen M, et al. Viruses and bacteria in sputum samples of children with community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18:300–7.
Ruuskanen O, et al. Viral pneumonia. Lancet. 2011;377(9773):1264–75.
Lahti E, et al. Induced sputum in the diagnosis of childhood community-acquired pneumonia. Thorax. 2009;64(3):252–7.
Juven T, et al. Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in 254 hospitalized children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000;19(4):293–8.
Tsolia MN, et al. Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized school-age children: evidence for high prevalence of viral infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(5):681–6.
Cevey-Macherel M, et al. Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized children based on WHO clinical guidelines. Eur J Pediatr. 2009;168(12):1429–36.
Hustedt JW, Vazquez M. The changing face of pediatric respiratory tract infections: how human metapneumovirus and human bocavirus fit into the overall etiology of respiratory tract infections in young children. Yale J Biol Med. 2010;83(4):193–200.
Williams JV, et al. Population-based incidence of human metapneumovirus infection among hospitalized children. J Infect Dis. 2010;201(12):1890–8.
Allander T. Human bocavirus. J Clin Virol. 2008;41(1):29–33.
Koskenvuo M, et al. Human bocavirus in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Eur J Pediatr. 2008;167(9):1011–5.
Martin ET, et al. Frequent and prolonged shedding of bocavirus in young children attending daycare. J Infect Dis. 2010;201(11):1625–32.
Schildgen O, et al. Human bocavirus: passenger or pathogen in acute respiratory tract infections? Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008;21(2):291–304. table of contents.
Thorburn K, et al. High incidence of pulmonary bacterial co-infection in children with severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) bronchiolitis. Thorax. 2006;61(7):611–5.
Fishman JA. Infection in solid-organ transplant recipients. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(25):2601–14.
Puligandla PS, Laberge JM. Respiratory infections: pneumonia, lung abscess, and empyema. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2008;17(1):42–52.
Linden PK. Approach to the immunocompromised host with infection in the intensive care unit. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2009;23(3):535–56.
Raghavendran K, et al. Aspiration-induced lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(4):818–26.
Don M, Canciani M, Korppi M. Community-acquired pneumonia in children: what’s old? What’s new? Acta Paediatr. 2010;99(11):1602–8.
Betancourt SL, et al. Lipoid pneumonia: spectrum of clinical and radiologic manifestations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(1):103–9.
Daltro P, et al. Pulmonary infections. Pediatr Radiol. 2011;41 Suppl 1:S69–82.
Swami SMP, Shah SS. Complicated pneumonia. In: Shah S, editor. Pediatric practice: infectious diseases. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2009.
Murray JF, Mason RJ. Murray and Nadel’s textbook of respiratory medicine. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders/Elsevier; 2010.
McCarthy PL, et al. Value of the C-reactive protein test in the differentiation of bacterial and viral pneumonia. J Pediatr. 1978;92(3):454–6.
Toikka P, et al. Serum procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 for distinguishing bacterial and viral pneumonia in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000;19(7):598–602.
Don M, et al. Differentiation of bacterial and viral community-acquired pneumonia in children. Pediatr Int. 2009;51(1):91–6.
Korppi M, Heiskanen-Kosma T, Leinonen M. White blood cells, C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in pneumococcal pneumonia in children. Eur Respir J. 1997;10(5):1125–9.
Korppi M. Non-specific host response markers in the differentiation between pneumococcal and viral pneumonia: what is the most accurate combination? Pediatr Int. 2004;46(5):545–50.
Esposito S, et al. Procalcitonin measurements for guiding antibiotic treatment in pediatric pneumonia. Respir Med. 2011;105:1939–45.
Jain P, et al. Role of flexible bronchoscopy in immunocompromised patients with lung infiltrates. Chest. 2004;125(2):712–22.
Bauer ML, et al. Chronic pulmonary aspiration in children. South Med J. 1993;86(7):789–95.
Parameswaran K, et al. Lipid-laden macrophages in induced sputum are a marker of oropharyngeal reflux and possible gastric aspiration. Eur Respir J. 2000;16(6):1119–22.
Hayes-Jordan A, et al. Open lung biopsy in pediatric bone marrow transplant patients. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37(3):446–52.
Muszynski JA, et al. Timing of correct parenteral antibiotic initiation and outcomes from severe bacterial community-acquired pneumonia in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011;30(4):295–301.
Meduri GU, et al. Activation and regulation of systemic inflammation in ARDS: rationale for prolonged glucocorticoid therapy. Chest. 2009;136(6):1631–43.
Kellum JA, et al. Understanding the inflammatory cytokine response in pneumonia and sepsis: results of the Genetic and Inflammatory Markers of Sepsis (GenIMS) Study. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(15):1655–63.
Yende S, et al. Inflammatory markers at hospital discharge predict subsequent mortality after pneumonia and sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177(11):1242–7.
De Pascale G, Bello G, Antonelli M. Steroids in severe pneumonia: a literature review. Minerva Anestesiol. 2011;77(9):902–10.
Meijvis SC, et al. Dexamethasone and length of hospital stay in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9782):2023–30.
Confalonieri M, et al. Hydrocortisone infusion for severe community-acquired pneumonia: a preliminary randomized study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171(3):242–8.
Weiss AK, et al. Adjunct corticosteroids in children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. Pediatrics. 2011;127(2):e255–63.
Corrales-Medina VF, Musher DM. Immunomodulatory agents in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review. J Infect. 2011;63(3):187–99.
Kanoh S, Rubin BK. Mechanisms of action and clinical application of macrolides as immunomodulatory medications. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23(3):590–615.
Rodriguez A, et al. Combination antibiotic therapy improves survival in patients with community-acquired pneumonia and shock. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(6):1493–8.
Waterer GW, Somes GW, Wunderink RG. Monotherapy may be suboptimal for severe bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(15):1837–42.
Restrepo MI, et al. Impact of macrolide therapy on mortality for patients with severe sepsis due to pneumonia. Eur Respir J. 2009;33(1):153–9.
Martin-Loeches I, et al. Combination antibiotic therapy with macrolides improves survival in intubated patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(4):612–20.
Principi N, et al. Role of Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae in children with community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32(9):1281–9.
Esposito S, et al. Characteristics of Streptococcus pneumoniae and atypical bacterial infections in children 2–5 years of age with community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35(11):1345–52.
Lu YJ, et al. Macrolide use shortens fever duration in Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in children: a 2-year experience. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2008;41(4):307–10.
Shah SS, et al. Macrolide therapy and outcomes in a multicenter cohort of children hospitalized with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. J Hosp Med. 2012;7(4):311–7.
Avansino JR, et al. Primary operative versus nonoperative therapy for pediatric empyema: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2005;115(6):1652–9.
Shah SS, et al. Comparative effectiveness of pleural drainage procedures for the treatment of complicated pneumonia in childhood. J Hosp Med. 2011;6(5):256–63.
Shah SS, et al. Primary early thoracoscopy and reduction in length of hospital stay and additional procedures among children with complicated pneumonia: results of a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162(7):675–81.
Li ST, Tancredi DJ. Empyema hospitalizations increased in US children despite pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Pediatrics. 2010;125(1):26–33.
Light RW. Parapneumonic effusions and empyema. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2006;3(1):75–80.
Koegelenberg CFN, Diacon AH, Bolliger CT. Parapneumonic pleural effusion and empyema. Respiration. 2008;75(3):241–50.
Shah SS, et al. Blood cultures in the emergency department evaluation of childhood pneumonia. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011;30(6):475–9.
St Peter SD, et al. Thoracoscopic decortication vs tube thoracostomy with fibrinolysis for empyema in children: a prospective, randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44(1):106–11. discussion 111.
Byington CL, et al. Impact of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on pneumococcal parapneumonic empyema. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006;25(3):250–4.
Byington CL, et al. An epidemiological investigation of a sustained high rate of pediatric parapneumonic empyema: risk factors and microbiological associations. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34(4):434–40.
Schultz KD, et al. The changing face of pleural empyemas in children: epidemiology and management. Pediatrics. 2004;113(6):1735–40.
Blaschke AJ, et al. Molecular analysis improves pathogen identification and epidemiologic study of pediatric parapneumonic empyema. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011;30(4):289–94.
Becker A, et al. Impact of antibiotic therapy on laboratory analysis of parapneumonic pleural fluid in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46(3):452–7.
Ampofo K, Byington C. Management of parapneumonic empyema. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007;26(5):445–6.
Ventre KM, Wolf GK, Arnold JH. Pediatric respiratory diseases: 2011 update for the Rogers’ textbook of pediatric intensive care. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011;12(3):325–38.
Sonnappa S, et al. Comparison of urokinase and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for treatment of childhood empyema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174(2):221–7.
Rahman NM, et al. Intrapleural use of tissue plasminogen activator and DNase in pleural infection. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(6):518–26.
Cohen E, Weinstein M, Fisman DN. Cost-effectiveness of competing strategies for the treatment of pediatric empyema. Pediatrics. 2008;121(5):e1250–7.
Jantunen E, et al. Diagnostic aspects of invasive Aspergillus infections in allogeneic BMT recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000;25(8):867–71.
Badiee P, et al. Diagnostic potential of nested PCR, galactomannan EIA, and beta-D-glucan for invasive aspergillosis in pediatric patients. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2012;6(4):352–7.
Colice GL, et al. Medical and surgical treatment of parapneumonic effusions : an evidence-based guideline. Chest. 2000;118(4):1158–71.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Morgan, C.I., Shah, S.S. (2014). Pneumonia. In: Wheeler, D., Wong, H., Shanley, T. (eds) Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6356-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6356-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6355-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6356-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)