Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Modules in Applied Mathematics ((MAM))

Abstract

As a preview of the subsequent analysis, imagine the following hypothetical situation. Assume that the five most recent Democratic presidents all lived at the same time (the present). All decide to seek their party’s presidential nomination in the first presidential primary in New Hampshire. You are a registered Democratic voter in New Hampshire and can vote for any candidate. If the candidate with the most votes wins in a plurality election, which candidate would you vote for? (Your judgment should be based not on the specific policies advocated by these presidents at the time they served, but instead on their competence to solve problems and their effectiveness as political leaders.)

This module is based in part on material contained in Brams [2], Brams [4], Brams and Fishburn [7], and Brams [5]. The latter two works contain detailed citations to the literature not given here. A booklength treatment and extension of results in this module, which was published as an Innovative Instructional Unit (Test Edition) by the American Political Science Association in 1978, can be found in Brams and Fishburn [6].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boehm, George A. W. “One Fervent Vote against Wintergreen,” mimeographed, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brams, Steven J. “One Man, n Votes,” mimeographed. Module in Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Association of America, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brams, Steven J. Paradoxes in Politics: An Introduction to the Nonobvious in Political Science. Free Press, New York, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brams, Steven J. “When Is It Advantageous to Cast a Negative Vote?,” Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems (Mathematical Economics and Game Theory: Essays in Honor of Oskar Morgenstern, R. Henn and O. Moeschlin eds.) 141. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1977), 564–572.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brams, Steven J. The Presidential Election Game. Yale University Press, New Haven, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brams, Steven J., and Fishburn, Peter C. Approval Voting. Birkhäuser, Boston, (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brams, Steven J. and Fishburn, Peter C. “Approval Voting,” American Political Science Review, 72 (1978), 831–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fishburn, Peter C. “A Strategic Analysis of Nonranked Voting Systems,” SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 35 (1978), 488–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Joslyn, Richard A. “The Impact of Decision Rules in Multicandidate Campaigns: The Case of the 1972 Democratic Presidential Nomination,” Public Choice 25(1976), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Keech, William R. and Matthews, Donald R. The Party’s Choice. Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kellett, John, and Mott, Kenneth. “Presidential Primaries: Measuring Popular Choice,” Polity, 9 (1977), 528–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kiewiet, D. Roderick, “Approval Voting: The Case of the 1968 Presidential Election,” Polity, 12 (1979), 170–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mazmanian, Daniel A. Third Parties in Presidential Elections. Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Merrill, Samuel III. “Approval Voting: A ‘Best Buy’ Method for Multicandidate Elections?” Mathematics Magazine, 52 (1978), 98–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Riker, William H. “The Number of Political Parties: A Reexamination of Duverger’s Law,” Comparative Politics, 9 (1976), 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Scammon, Richard M., and Wattenberg, Ben J. The Real Majority: An Extra-ordinary Examination of the American Electorate. Coward, McCann, & Geoghegan New York, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stratmann, William C. “The Calculus of Rational Choice,” Public Choice, 18 (1974), 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stratmann, William C. Personal communication (September 21, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Weber, Robert James. “Comparison of Voting Systems,” mimeographed, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Weber, Robert James. “Multiply-Weighted Voting Systems,” mimeographed, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brams, S.J. (1983). Comparison Voting. In: Brams, S.J., Lucas, W.F., Straffin, P.D. (eds) Political and Related Models. Modules in Applied Mathematics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5430-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5430-0_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-5432-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-5430-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics