Skip to main content

The Right to Refuse Treatment

A Critique

  • Chapter
Who Decides?

Abstract

The phrase “the right to treatment” became popular during the 1960s. As soon as it did, I denounced it as pernicious nonsense, contrived by public interest lawyers who fancy themselves to be civil libertarians, but who are, in fact, the bitterest enemies of civil liberties.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Szasz, T. S. The Right to Health, The Georgetown Law Journal 57: 734–751 (March, 1969 )

    Google Scholar 

  2. Szasz, T. S. The Theology of Medicine. New York: Harper/Colophon, 1977, pp. 100–117;

    Google Scholar 

  3. Szasz, T. S. Psychiatric Slavery: When Confinement and Coercion Masquerade as Cure. New York: The Free Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Szasz, Psychiatric Slavery, 57: 734–751 (March, 1969), especially Chapters 1 and 8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See, for example, Sadoff, R. L., On Refusing Treatment: Rights and Remedies, Advocacy Now 1: 57–60 (August, 1979 )

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schaeffer, P. Court Rules That Mental Patients Have Right to Refuse Treat¬ment, Clinical Psychiatry News 8: 1 & 36–37 (January, 1980 ).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Szasz, T. S. The Right to Health, The Georgetown Law Journal 57: 734–751 (March, 1969 ).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cited in Westin, A. F. Medical Records: Should Patients Have Access? Hastings Center Report, December, 1977, pp. 23–28; p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cited in, APA objects to proposed drug inserts, Psychiatric News 14: 16 (December 7, 1979 ).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Szasz, T. S. The Myth of Mental Illness. The American Psychologist 15: 113–118 (February, 1960 ), p. 118;

    Google Scholar 

  11. Szasz, T. S Ideology and Insanity, pp. 12–24. Garden City, N. Y.: Doubleday Anchor, 1970, p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Slovenko, R., Prostitution and STD: When Treatment Becomes Punishment. Sexual Medicine Today, January, 1980, pp. 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Involuntary care approved, American Medical News, December 21, 1979, p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1962 HUMANA Press Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Szasz, T. (1962). The Right to Refuse Treatment. In: Bell, N.K. (eds) Who Decides?. Contemporary Issues in Biomedicine, Ethics, and Society. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5823-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5823-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-5825-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-5823-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics