Skip to main content

Justice in the Political Arena

  • Chapter
The Sense of Injustice

Part of the book series: Critical Issues in Social Justice ((CISJ))

Abstract

Social psychologists have a long-standing concern with understanding the principles that describe the “just” or “fair” allocation of resources. Several possible fair allocation principles have been identified (Deutsch, 1975; Leventhal, 1976), and there has been a considerable amount of research on distributive justice, primarily on the principle of equity (Berkowitz & Walster, 1976; Walster, Walster, & Berscheid, 1978). Recently, this interest in distributive justice has been distinguished from an interest in the procedures through which allocation decisions are made. This latter topic has been labeled Procedural justice (Thibaut & Walker, 1975), and it has also been the subject of a number of studies (Folger, Rosenfield, Grove, & Corkran, 1979; Houlden, LaTour, Walker, & Thibaut, 1978; LaTour, 1978; LaTour, Houlden, Walker, & Thibaut, 1976; Thibaut & Walker, 1975; Thibaut, Walker, LaTour, & Houlden, 1974; Walker, LaTour, Lind, & Thibaut, 1974).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anton, T. J. Roles and symbols in the determination of state expenditures. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 1967, 11, 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, W. G. Equity theory and social comparison processes. In J. M. Suls & R. L. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison processes. Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere Publishing Co., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, W. G. Justice, freedom, and self-interest in intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R., Meyer, F. A., Jr., Corbett, A. M., & Rudoni, D. Evaluation of police services in medium-sized cities. Law and Policy Quarterly, 1979, 1, 1979, 235 – 248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, L., & Walster, E. (Eds.). Equity theory: Toward a general theory of social interaction. Advances in experimental social psychology(Vol 9 ). New York: Academic Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, M., & Crosby, F. An empirical examination of relative deprivation theory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1980, 16, 442 – 456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boynton, G. R., & Loewenberg, G. The development of public support for parliament in Germany, 1951-1959. British Journal of Political Science, 1973, 3, 169 – 189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, P., & Folger, R. Micro and macro justice. In M. J. Lerner (Ed.), The justice motive in social behavior. New York: Plenum Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, W., Burns, T., & Meeker, L. D. Structural resolutions of collective action problems. Behavioral Science, 1974, 19, 277 – 297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T. A structural theory of social exchange. Acta Sociologica, 1973, 16, 188 – 208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Citrin, J. Comment: The political relevance of trust in government. American Political Science Review, 1974, 68, 973 – 988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Citrin, J., McClosky, H., Shanks, J. M., & Sniderman, P. M. Personal and political sources of political alienation. British Journal of Political Science, 1975, 5, 1 – 32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. K. Deviance and control. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. S., & Parcel, T. L. Equity theory: Directions for future research. Sociological Inquiry, 1977, 47, 75 – 88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D., Crosby, F., & Hennigan, K. The construct validity of relative deprivation. In J. M. Suls & R. L. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison processes. Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L. The functions of social conflict. New York: Free Press, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 1976, 83, 85 – 113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, R. T. Income equity among U.S. workers. New York: Praeger, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahrendorf, R. Class and class conflict in industrial society. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M. Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 1980, 31, 169 – 194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as a basis of distributive justice ? Journal of Social Issues, 1975, 31, 137 – 150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolbeare, K. The public views the Supreme Court. In H. Jacob (Ed)., Law, politics, and the federal courts. Boston: Little, Brown, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D. A systems analysis of political life. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D. Political science. In D. L. Sills (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences(Vol. 12 ). New York: Macmillan, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D. A reassessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science, 1975, 5, 435 – 457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D., & Dennis, J. Children in the political system: The origins of political legitimacy. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, M. The symbolic uses of politics. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engstrom, R. L., & Giles, M. W. Expectations and images: A note on diffuse system support for legal institutions. Law and Society Review, 1972, 6, 631 – 636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior. Reading, Mass.: Addison- Wesley, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flacks, R. Protest or conform: Some special psychological perspectives on legitimacy. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1969, 5, 127 – 149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., Grove, J., & Corkran, L. Effects of “voice” and peer opinions on responses to inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 2253 – 2261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, L. N. The legal system: A social science perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, W. A. Power and discontent. Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, T. R. Why men rebel. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, J. L. Equality, differentiation, or both? American beliefs about distributive justice. Unpublished manuscript, Institute of Policy Sciences and Public Affairs, Duke University, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houlden, P., LaTour, S., Walker, L., & Thibaut, J. Preference for modes of dispute resolution as a function of process and decision control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1978, 14, 13 – 30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. C. Compliance, identification and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1958, 2, 51 – 60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. C. Patterns of personal involvement in the national system: A socio-psychological analysis of political legitimacy. In J. Rosenau (Ed.), International politics and foreign policy(Rev. ed.). New York: Free Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krislov, S., Boyum, K. O., Clark, J. N., Schaefer, R. C., & White, S. O. (Eds.), Compliance and the law. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, R. E. Political ideology. New York: Free Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. Politics: Who gets what, when, how. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1936. Lasswell, H. D., & Kaplan, A. Power and society. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1950. LaTour, S. Determinants of participant and observer satisfaction with adversary and inquisitorial modes of adjudication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978, 36, 1531 – 1545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaTour, S., Houlden, P., Walker, L., & Thibaut, J. Procedure. The Yale Law Journal, 1976, 83, 258 – 291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, G. S. Fairness in social relationships. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lineberry, R. L. Equality and urban policy: The distribution of municipal public services. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark, M. M. Justice in the aggregate: The perceived fairness of the distribution of income. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClosky, H. Consensus and ideology in American politics. American Political Science Review, 1964, 58, 361 – 382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michener, H. A., & Lawler, E. J. Endorsement of formal leaders: An integrative model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 216 – 223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. Political issues and trust in government: 1964–1970. American Political Science Review, 68, 951–972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. B., & Leonard-Barton, D. Toward strategies for marketing energy conservation. Research Paper No. 372. Stanford, Calif.: Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J. E. War, presidents and public opinion. New York: Wiley, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, E. N. Correlates and consequences of belief in the legitimacy of regime structures. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 1970, 14 , 392–412. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, E. N. The representation of citizens by political authorities: Consequences for regime support. American Political Science Review, 1910, 64, 1149–1166. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, E. N. Test of a partial theory of potential for political violence. American Political Science Review, 1972, 66, 928 – 959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, E. N., & Jukan, T. O. On the meaning of political support. American Political Science Review, 1971, 77, 1561 – 1595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, W. F., & Tanenhaus, J. Public opinion and the United States Supreme Court: A preliminary mapping of some prerequisites for court legitimization of regime changes. In J. B. Grossman & J. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Frontiers of judicial research. New York: Wiley, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, W. F., Tanenhaus, J., & Kastner, D. L. Public evaluations of constitutional courts Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mussen, P. Early socialization: Learning and identification. New directions in psychology(Vol. 3 ). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okun, A. M. Equality and efficiency: The big tradeoff. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkin, F. Class inequality and political order, New York: Praeger, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks, R. B. Complementary measures of police performance. In K. Dolbeare (Ed.), Public policy evaluation. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. On the concept of influence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1963, 27, 63 – 82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. Some reflections on the place of force in social process. In T. Parsons (Ed.), Sociological theory and modern society. New York: Free Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. Social evaluation theory. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation(Vol. 15 ). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitts, J. R. Social control. In D. Sills (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences(Vol. 14 ). New York: Macmillan Co., 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prothro, J. W., & Grigg, C. W. Fundamental principles of democracy: Bases of agreement and disagreement. Journal of Politics, 1960, 22, 276 – 294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainwater, L. What money buys: Inequality and the social meanings of income. New York: Basic Books, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, E. E. On justice as equality. Journal of Social Issues, 1975, 31, 45 – 64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarat, A. Studying American legal culture: An assessment of survey evidence. Law and Society Review, 1977, 2, 427 – 488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheingold, S. A. The politics of rights: Lawyers, public policy, and political change. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. C. On the ecology of micro-motives(Public Policy Program, Kennedy School of Government, Working Paper). Harvard University, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolnick, J. Social control in the adversary system. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1967, 11, 52 – 70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, E. A., DeVinney, L. C., Starr, S. A., & Williams, R. M. The American soldier: Adjustments during army life(Vol. 1 ). Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strumpel, B. Economic deprivation and societal discontent. In B. Strumpel (Ed.), Economic means for human needs, Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J., & Kelley, H. H. The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J., Walker, L., LaTour, S., & Houlden, P. Procedural justice as fairness. Stanford Law Review, 1974, 26, 1271 – 1289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. Citizen evaluations of the Evanston police. Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Caine, A. The influence of outcomes and procedures upon satisfaction with formal leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981, 41, 642 – 655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Griffin, G. Distributive justice in the economic and political arenas. Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L., LaTour, S., Lind, A., & Thibaut, J. Reactions of participants and observers to modes of adjudication. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1974, 4, 295 – 310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasby, S. L. The impact of the United States Supreme Court. Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A. L. Deviant behavior and control strategies. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worchel, P., Hester, P. G., & Kopala, P. S. Collective protest and legitimacy of authority. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1974, 18, 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tyler, T.R. (1984). Justice in the Political Arena. In: Folger, R. (eds) The Sense of Injustice. Critical Issues in Social Justice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2683-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2683-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9669-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-2683-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics