Skip to main content

Surface Characterization of Anodic Oxides on Aluminium Alloys by Means of Surface Potential Difference, Surface Impedance and Surface Morphology

  • Chapter
Adhesive Joints

Abstract

To obtain acceptable adhesion and durability of adhesive bonded structures, anodizing of aluminium alloys in chromic acid or phosphoric acid is commonly used in the aircraft industry. In order to find a non-destructive testing technique to inspect pretreated parts and to gain further understanding, we used some simple techniques to characterize surfaces. Using Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) as a tool to characterize surface morphology showed that porous oxides gave the best adhesion quality. The Surface Potential Difference (SPD) measurement was found to be very sensitive to adsorbed dipole layers on surfaces. Surface Impedance (Z) measurements were introduced for determination of the sealing quality of anodic oxides, but can also be used to characterize non-sealed oxide layers. On the basis of experimental data obtained, the effects of several variables in the anodizing process on SPD and Z measurements and TEM morphology are discussed. Also the effects of ageing of anodic oxides by dipping in ambient temperature water are shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P.F.A. Bijlmer and R.J. Schliekelmann, SAMPE Quarterly 5, 13 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Keller, M.S. Hunter and D.L. Robinson, J. Electrochem. Soc. 100, 411 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  3. H Ginsberg and K. Wefers, Metall. 17, 202 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Hartman, N.L.R. Report TN M. 2091 National Aerospace Laboratory the Netherlands, Amsterdam (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  5. P.F.A. Bijlmer, J. Adhesion 5, 319 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.D. Venables, D.K. McNamara, J.M. Chen, T.S. Sun and R.L. Hopping, Appl. Surface Sci. 3, 88 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  7. P.F.A. Bijlmer, Metal Finishing 70, 30 (April 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Matting and K. Ulmer, Kautschuk und Gummi. Kunststoffe 16, 280, 387 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. Thomson (Lord Kelvin), Phil. Mag. 5, 82 (1898).

    Google Scholar 

  10. P.F.A. Bijlmer in “Surface Contamination: Genesis, Detection and Control”, K.L. Mittal, Editor, Vo1.2, pp. 723–748, Plenum Press, New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C.E. Michelson, J. Electrochem. Soc. 115, 213 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A.T. Fromhold, Jr. and J. Kruger, J. Electrochem. Soc. 120, 722 (1973 ).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. T. Smith and G. Lindberg, Surface Technol. 9, 1 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  14. E.T. Englehart and D.J. George, Materials Protection 3, 24 (Nov. 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. Birtel and W. Leute, Aluminium 43, 93 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Ott, Aluminium 52, 491 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  17. R.J. Schliekelmann, Non Destructive Testing 5, 79 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  18. L.M. Rose, “The Application of Mathematical Modelling to Process Development and Design”, Applied Science Publishers Ltd., London, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  19. O.L. Davies, “The Design and Analysis of Industrial Experiments”, Oliver and Boyd, London, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. Leek and N.A. Hampson, Surface Technol. 7, 151 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Ross MacDonald and J.A. Garber, J. Electrochem. Soc. 124, 1022 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  22. G.H. Golub and C. Reinsch in “Handbook for Automatic Computation, Vol. II: Linear Algebra”, J.H. Wilkinson and C. Reinsch, Editors, pp. 134–151, Springer Verlag, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  23. K.S. Cole and R.H. Cole, J. Chem. Phys. 9, 341 (1941).

    Google Scholar 

  24. H.J. de Wit, C. Wijenberg and C. Crevecoeur, J. Electrochem. Soc. 126, 779 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kwakernaak, A., Exalto, R., van Hoof, H.A. (1984). Surface Characterization of Anodic Oxides on Aluminium Alloys by Means of Surface Potential Difference, Surface Impedance and Surface Morphology. In: Mittal, K.L. (eds) Adhesive Joints. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2749-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2749-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9702-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-2749-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics