Abstract
Accurate knowledge of the gravity field is a firm requirement in any study of Planet Earth. From the long wavelength signal of the mantle processes to the very local features of the continental lithosphere, gravity is a driving and shaping force whose accurate determination has been a major scientific goal for centuries. Space techniques have so far demonstrated their superiority in the global mapping of the gravity field based on ground tracking and altimeter data mostly. Proliferation of global tracking of geopotential missions from the Global Positioning System (GPS) satellite constellation has added a new and very powerful source of gravity information to be combined with the primary observations (altimeter data, laser ranging, gradiometry) for gravity field determination to unprecedented accuracies. Numerical and analytical simulation studies of the upcoming geophysically relevant missions that will most likely cany GPS receivers, indicate significant improvements in the accuracy as well as the resolution of the gravity field. TOPEX will improve by some two orders of magnitude the long wavelength part (to degree ~20), while GP-B will contribute in the long as well as medium wavelength part of the spectrum (up to degree ~60). The gradiometer measurements on ARISTOTELES will contribute in the medium and short wavelength regions (from degree ~30 up); GPS tracking of the spacecraft though will provide additional information for the long wavelength gravity and will help resolve it to accuracies comparable to those obtained from GP-B. With the mean rms coefficient error per degree kept below 10−10 geophysical signals such as the post-glacial rebound, tidal variations, and secular and periodic variations of the zonal field rise above the noise level and become readily observable processes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Benz, R., H. Faulks, and M. Langemann: “ARISTOTELES — A European Approach for an Earth Gravity Field Recovery Mission”, in Proc. of the Chapman Conference on the Progress in the Determination of the Earth’s Gravity Field, R.H. Rapp (ed.), Rept of the Dept. of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 1989.
Bernard, A.: “The Gradio Spaceborne Gravity Gradiometer: Development and Accommodation”, in Proc. of the Chapman Conference on the Progress in the Determination of the Earth’s Gravity Field, R.H. Rapp (ed.), Reports of the Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 1989.
Colombo, O.L. “Mapping the Earth’s Gravity Field with Orbiting GPS Receivers”, in Global Positioning System: An Overview, Proc. of the IAG Symposia 102, Bock, Y. and N. Leppard (eds.), the General Meeting of the International Association of Geodesy, Edinburgh, Scotland, August 2–11, 1989, Springer-Verlag, 1990.
Colombo, O.L.: “High Resolution Analysis of Satellite Gradiometry”, in Proc. of the Chapman Conference on the Progress in the Determination of the Earth’s Gravity Field, R.H. Rapp (ed.), Rept. of the Dept. of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 1989.
Lerch, F.J. (1991). “Optimum data weighting and error calibration for estimation of gravitational parameters”, Bulletin Giodisique, 65, pp. 44–52.
Lerch, F.J., G.B. Patel and S.M. Klosko (1991). “Direct calibration of GEM-T1 with 1071 5°x5° mean gravity anomalies from altimetry”, Manuscripta Geodaetica, 16, pp. 141–147.
Marsh, J. G. et al., (1988). “A New Gravitational Model for the Earth from Satellite Tracking Data: GEM-T1,” J. Geophys. Res., 93, B6, pp. 6169–6215.
Marsh, J.G. et al. (1990). “The GEM-T2 Gravitational Model”, J. Geophys. Res., 95, B13, pp. 22, 043–22, 071.
Mashhoon, B., F.W. Hehl, and D.S. Theiss (1984). “On the Gravitational Effects of Rotating Masses: The Thirring-Lense Papers”, General Relativity and Gravitation, V. 16, No. 8, pp. 711–750.
NASA, (1991). The GEM-T3 and T3S Gravitational Models, NASA TM in preparation.
Pavlis, E.C., O.L. Colombo, and D.E. Smith. “Simulation of the GPS/GP-B Geopotential Experiment”, NASA TM, (in preparation).
Rapp, R.H. and N. Pavlis (1990). “The development and Analysis of Geopotential Coefficient Models to Spherical Harmonic Degree 360”, J. Geophys. Res., 95, B13, pp. 21, 885–21,912.
Schrama, E. (1990). “Gravity Field Error Analysis: Applications of GPS Receivers and Gradiometers on Low Orbiting Platforms”, NASA TM-100769, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD.
Smith, D.E., F.J. Lerch, O.L. Colombo, and C.W.F. Everitt (1989). “Gravity Field Information from Gravity Probe-B”, in Proc. of the Chapman Conference on the Progress in the Determination of the Earth’s Gravity Field, R.H. Rapp (ed.), Reports of the Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Yunck, T.P., W.I. Bertiger, S.M. Lichten, and S.C. Wu (1986). “Tracking Landsat-5 by a Differential GPS Technique”, AIAA Paper 86–2215-CP, AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Conference, Williamsburg, VA, August 18–20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pavlis, E.C. (1992). Gravity Field Estimation from Future Space Missions: TOPEX/POSEIDON, Gravity Probe B, and Aristoteles. In: Colombo, O.L. (eds) From Mars to Greenland: Charting Gravity With Space and Airborne Instruments. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 110. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9255-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9255-2_5
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-97857-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-9255-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive