Skip to main content

How Are Sovereign Ratings Assigned?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Century of Sovereign Ratings

Abstract

This chapter describes the rating process and emphasizes that CRAs have always used an analyst-driven approach to assign sovereign ratings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Moody’s Manual (1926), “Introduction,” p. vi.

  2. 2.

    Moody’s Investment Letter (1921), “The Foreign Situation,” 8 September.

  3. 3.

    Standard Statistics (1922), Standard Daily Trade Service, May.

  4. 4.

    Standard Statistics (1923), Standard Daily Trade Service, August.

  5. 5.

    As evidenced by browsing Poor’s Volumes and Fitch Bond Books.

  6. 6.

    After Poor’s went bankrupt and was refinanced by Paul T. Babson, the agency was headquartered in Wellesley (Massachusetts) until its merger with Standard Statistics in 1941.

  7. 7.

    David Levey (former Managing Director, Sovereign Risk Unit, Moody’s Investors Service) in an interview with the author on 16 December 2003 in New York.

  8. 8.

    Venezuela was rated Aaa by Moody’s when it defaulted.

  9. 9.

    “Moody’s Moves into Sovereign Debt Rating,” Australian Financial Review , 14 July 1986.

  10. 10.

    Information collected by the author during the S&P annual meeting in Paris, 24 June 2008.

  11. 11.

    In August 1996, Fitch, Duff & Phelps, and IBCA rated 1, 8, and 40 countries, respectively (Huhne 1996). In August 2001, Fitch rated 71 sovereigns.

  12. 12.

    Fitch Sovereign Brochure (undated document).

  13. 13.

    The exception was John Moody, who certainly had a strong influence on the rating process.

  14. 14.

    Investment Letters were renamed Investment Surveys in 1931 and Bond Surveys in 1936.

  15. 15.

    Unlike now, Moody’s publications then included lists of “attractive” bonds as well as recommendations on whether to sell, buy, or hold securities.

  16. 16.

    See Flandreau et al. ( 2010 ) for an exhaustive presentation of the products offered by the four agencies.

  17. 17.

    Moody’s FC sovereign ratings increased from 11 in 1985 to 34 in 1990.

  18. 18.

    “US Credit Rating Agency Is Considering Altering the Way It Expresses Its Assessments of Sovereign Borrowers,” Financial Times , 8 July 1988.

  19. 19.

    David Levey (former Managing Director, Sovereign Risk Unit, Moody’s Investors Service) in an interview with the author on 22 March 2010 in New York.

  20. 20.

    Since the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) code was introduced in 2004, there has been a strict separation between analytical and commercial functions within every rating agency. Thus, analysts are supposed to be shielded from information about the fees being charged for their work (IOSCO 2004).

  21. 21.

    During the past decade, the number of countries monitored by a given analyst ranged from 8 to 15 (figures based on interviews with various sovereign rating analysts).

  22. 22.

    Since lower-ranking analysts can be lead analysts, this rule means that a lead analyst may not be allowed to vote.

  23. 23.

    See “Fitch Withdraws Iran Rating on Bond Payment,” Reuters, 24 April 2008.

References

  • Fitch (various years), Fitch Bond Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch Ratings (undated), “Fitch Sovereign Brochure”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch Ratings (2006), “The Rating Process”, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flandreau M., Gaillard N. and Packer F. (2010), “To Err Is Human: Rating Agencies and the Interwar Foreign Government Debt Crisis”, BIS Working Papers No. 335, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huhne C. (1996), “Rating Sovereign Risk”, Bank of England, Financial Stability Review, Issue 1, Autumn.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization of Securities Commissions (2004), Code of Conduct Fundamentals for Credit Rating Agencies, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody’s Investors Service (various years), “Investment Letters”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody’s Investors Service (various years), Manuals of Government Securities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody’s Investors Service (2004), “Guide to Moody’s Ratings, Rating Process, and Rating Practices”, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody’s Investors Service (2009), “Non-Participating Rated Issuers, February”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poor’s (various years), Poor’s Volumes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standard & Poor’s (2009), “Guide to Credit Rating Essentials”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standard Statistics (various years), Standard Bond Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standard Statistics (various years), “Standard Daily Trade Services”.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norbert Gaillard .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gaillard, N. (2012). How Are Sovereign Ratings Assigned?. In: A Century of Sovereign Ratings. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0523-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics