Skip to main content

Social Safety Nets in the Western Balkans: Design, Implementation, and Performance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Poverty and Exclusion in the Western Balkans

Abstract

This chapter provides a comparative perspective on the design, implementation, financing, and performance of the noncontributory cash transfer programs (social assistance) across the six countries in the Western Balkan region (Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, FYR Macedonia, Kosovo, Montenegro, and Serbia) and benchmarks their performance against similar programs in other countries in Central and Eastern Europe. The means-tested last-resort social assistance programs that exist in all six Western Balkan countries are the primary focus of the analysis. This chapter examines their core features, taking stock of basic indicators of their scope and performance and reviewing their financing, institutional setup, eligibility criteria, main design aspects, and implementation processes in the context of the main functions of social protection—the three “P”s for resilience and opportunity: (1) prevention against drop in well-being, income, and expenditure shocks; (2) protection from destitution and losses of human capital; and (3) promotion of human capital development, opportunities, livelihoods, and better jobs (World Bank. Building Resilience and Opportunity. The World Bank’s Social Protection and Labor Strategy 2012-2022. Concept Note for CODE Review. The World Bank, Washington, DC, 2011; Grosh et al. For Protection & Promotion: The Design and Implementation of Effective Safety Nets. The World Bank, Washington, DC, 2008).

The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this chapter are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank and its affiliated organizations or those of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, FYR Macedonia, Kosovo, Montenegro, and Serbia.

  2. 2.

    Compared to an overall GDP decline of 5.2% of GDP in Europe and Central Asia.

  3. 3.

    In 2008, the means-tested programs in FYR Macedonia absorbed 0.75% of GDP, against 0.22% of GDP allocation on categorical programs. In 2009, the spending on means-tested programs increased marginally to 0.77% of GDP compared to a significant growth in the spending on categorical programs that reached 0.34% of GDP.

  4. 4.

    Only in FBH, until 2010.

  5. 5.

    Except for one of the ten cantons where the canton shares the responsibility for financing with the municipalities.

  6. 6.

    Developed by the World Bank’s poverty team—a standard basket of goods and services across all countries and all expenses are similarly deflated across countries and expressed in per capita terms.

  7. 7.

    Individuals are sorted into quintiles for each transfer using “per capita consumption—per capita social assistance transfers.”

  8. 8.

    Administrative data and staff calculations; estimates/approximate numbers for Albania because administrative data is collected for households only (102,000 households at the point of estimation).

  9. 9.

    Calculated using the OECD tax-benefit model, see Annex 5.

  10. 10.

    It is interesting to note that there is a complete disconnect between the poverty line in a particular country and the income threshold for eligibility for the last-resort social assistance program in that country. Setting eligibility thresholds closer to the poverty line (or to a relative poverty line) can further assist in the LRSA program achieving its goal of protecting the chronic poor—such linking of eligibility thresholds and poverty lines will also address some of the concerns related to regularly indexing the thresholds to price inflation.

References

  • Grosh, Margaret, Carlo del Ninno, Emil Tesliuc, and Azedine Ouerghi (2008) For Protection & Promotion: The Design and Implementation of Effective Safety Nets. World Bank, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2010a) “Social Protection in the Member States of the European Union, of the European Economic Area and in Switzerland”. MISSOC Info II. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, European Commission, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2010b) “Social Activation: Building the Bridge between Benefits and Work: A Good Practice Report.” European Commission, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2008) “Developments in the National Social Protection Legislations.” MISSOC Info II. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs, and Equal Opportunities, European Commission, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU (2006) “The Role of Minimum Income for Social Inclusion in the European Union”. (IP/A/EMPL/FWC/2006-05/SC2). European Union, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF (2010) IMF World Economic Outlook Database, April 2010, International Monetary Fund, Washington DC, October 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2011a) “Building Resilience and Opportunity. The World Bank’s Social Protection and Labor Strategy 2012-2022”. Concept Note for CODE Review. The World Bank. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2011b) “Building Resilient Safety Nets”. Social Protection South-South Learning Forum 2011. The World Bank. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2011c) “Social Safety Nets in the Western Balkans: Design, Implementation and performance”. Report No. 54396-ECA. The World Bank. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2011d) “South Central Europe Regional Economic Report”. The World Bank. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank and Statistical Office of Kosovo (2011) “Consumption Poverty in the Republic of Kosovo, 2009”. The World Bank. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. Europe and Central Asia Social Protection Database. The World Bank, last updated August 2011.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boryana Gotcheva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gotcheva, B., Sundaram, R. (2013). Social Safety Nets in the Western Balkans: Design, Implementation, and Performance. In: Ruggeri Laderchi, C., Savastano, S. (eds) Poverty and Exclusion in the Western Balkans. Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion and Well-Being, vol 8. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4945-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4945-4_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4944-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4945-4

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics