Abstract
The mathematical creativity of fourth to sixth graders, high achievers in mathematics, is studied in relation to their problem-posing abilities. The study reveals that in problem-posing situations, mathematically high achievers develop cognitive frames that make them cautious in changing the parameters of their posed problems, even when they make interesting generalizations. These students display a kind of cognitive flexibility that seems mathematically specialized, which emerges from gradual and controlled changes in cognitive framing. More precisely, in a problem-posing context, students’ mathematical creativity manifests itself through a process of abstraction-generalization based on small, incremental changes of parameters, in order to achieve synthesis and simplification. This approach results from a tension between the students’ tendency to maintain a built-in cognitive frame, and the possibility to overcome it, which is constrained by their need to devise mathematical problems that are coherent and consistent.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amabile, T. M. (1989). Growing up creative: Nurturing a lifetime of creativity. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation Press.
Baer, J. (1993). Divergent thinking and creativity: A task-specific approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Baer, J. (1996). The effects of task-specific divergent-thinking training. Journal of Creative Behavior, 30, 183–187.
Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity in creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 173–177.
Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The amusement park theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27, 158–163.
Balka, D. S. (1974). The development of an instrument to measure creative ability in mathematics. Dissertation Abstracts International, 36(01), 98. (UMI No. AAT 7515965).
Brown, S. I., & Walter, M. I. (1983/1990). The art of problem posing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cai, J., & Cifarelli, V. (2005). Exploring mathematical exploration: How two college students formulated and solved their own mathematical problems. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 27(3), 43–72.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity, flow, and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Getzels, J. W. (1971). Discovery-oriented behavior and the originality of creative products: A study with artists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19(1), 47.
Deák, G. O. (2004). The development of cognitive flexibility and language abilities. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 31, 271–327.
Demetriou, A., Kui, Z. X., Spanoudis, G., Christou, C., Kyriakides, L., & Platsidou, M. (2005). The architecture, dynamics, and development of mental processing: Greek, Chinese, or Universal? Intelligence, 33(2), 109–141.
Dillon, J. T. (1982). Problem finding and solving. Journal of Creative Behavior, 16, 97–111.
Dow, G. T., & Mayer, R. E. (2004). Teaching students to solve insight problems: Evidence for domain specificity in creativity training. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 389–398.
Dreyfus, T., & Eisenberg, T. (1996). On different facets of mathematical thinking. In R. J. Sternberg & T. Ben-Zeev (Eds.), The nature of mathematical thinking (pp. 253–284). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Eisenhardt, K. M., Furr, N. R., & Bingham, C. B. (2010). Microfoundations of performance: Balancing efficiency and flexibility in dynamic environments. Organization Science, 21(6), 1263–1273.
English, D. L. (1998). Children’s problem posing within formal and informal contexts. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(1), 83–106.
Ervynck, G. (1991). Mathematical creativity. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 42–53). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
European Commission. (2003/2004). Working group on basic skills, progress reports 2003, 2004, European Commission interim working document for the objectives 1.2 (developing the skills for the knowledge society), 3.2 (developing the spirit of enterprise), and 3.3 (Improving foreign language learning) Annex 2 Domains of Key Competences—Definitions, Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes. Retrieved from http://europa.eu.int/comm/education/policies/2010/objectives_en.html#basic
European Commission. (2005). Proposal for a recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Key Competences for Lifelong Learning, Council of The European Union, 11 November 2005.
Evans, E. W. (1964). Measuring the ability of students to respond in creative mathematical situations at the late elementary and early junior high school level. Dissertation Abstracts, 25(12), 7107. (UMI No. AAT 6505302).
Fasko, D. (2001). Education and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 317–327.
Freiman, V., & Sriraman, B. (2007). Does mathematics gifted education need a working philosophy of creativity? Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 6(1–2), 23–46.
Furr, N. R. (2009). Cognitive flexibility: The adaptive reality of concrete organization change (Doctoral dissertation). Stanford University, Stanford, CA. Retrieved May 12, 2011, from http://gradworks.umi.com/3382938.pdf
Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity as seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Ghandi. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (2006). Five minds for the future. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Gardner, H., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Damon, M. (2001). Good work: When excellence meets ethics. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Getzels, J. W. (1975). Problem-finding and the inventiveness of solutions. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 9(1), 12–18.
Getzels, J. W. (1979). Problem finding: A theoretical note. Cognitive Science, 3(2), 167–172.
Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York, NY: Wiley.
Getzels, J. W., & Jackson, P. W. (1962). Creativity and intelligence: Explorations with gifted students. New York, NY: Wiley.
Ginsburg, H. P. (1996). Toby’s math. In R. J. Sternberg & T. Ben-Zeev (Eds.), The nature of mathematical thinking (pp. 175–282). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Goncalo, J. A., Vincent, L., & Audia, P. G. (2010). Early creativity as a constraint on future achievement. In D. Cropley, J. Kaufman, A. Cropley, & M. Runco (Eds.), The dark side of creativity (pp. 114–133). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Creative Behavior, 1, 3–14.
Hadamard, J. (1945/1954). Psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Haylock, D. W. (1987). A framework for assessing mathematical creativity in schoolchildren. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18(1), 59–74.
Haylock, D. (1997). Recognizing mathematical creativity in school children. International Reviews on Mathematical Education, 29(3), 68–74. Retrieved March 10, 2003, from http://www.fiz-karlsruhe.de/fix/publications/zdm/adm97
Huang, R., & Leung, K. S. F. (2004). Cracking the paradox of Chinese learners: Looking into the mathematics classrooms in Hong Kong and Shanghai. In L. Fan, N. Y. Wong, J. Cai, & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders (pp. 348–381). River Edge, NJ: World Scientific.
Jay, E. S., & Perkins, D. N. (1997). Problem finding: The search for mechanism. In M. Runco (Ed.), The creativity research handbook (pp. 257–293). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Jensen, L. R. (1973). The relationships among mathematical creativity, numerical aptitude and mathematical achievement. Dissertation Abstracts International, 34(05), 2168. (UMI No. AAT 7326021).
Krems, J. F. (1995). Cognitive flexibility and complex problem solving. In P. A. Frensch & J. Funke (Eds.), Complex problem solving: The European perspective (pp. 201–218). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Leikin, R., & Lev, M. (2007). Multiple solution tasks as a magnifying glass for observation of mathematical creativity. In J.-H. Woo, H.-C. Lew, K.-S. Park, & D.-Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 161–168). Seoul, South Korea: PME.
Leung, S. S. (1997). On the role of creative thinking in problem posing. Zentralbatt fur Didaktik der Mathematik (ZDM), 97(2), 48–52.
Leung, S. S., & Silver, E. A. (1997). The role of task format, mathematics knowledge, and creative thinking on the arithmetic problem posing of prospective elementary school teachers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 9(1), 5–24.
Lim, C. S. (2007). Characteristics of mathematics teaching in Shanghai, China: Through the lens of a Malaysian. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19(1), 77–89.
Lowrie, T. (2002). Young children posing problems: The influence of teacher intervention on the type of problems children pose. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 14(2), 87–98.
Lubart, T., & Guignard, J. (2004). The generality-specificity of creativity: A multivariate approach. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 43–56). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
NAEP Mathematics Framework for the 2011 National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2012). Retrieved October 2012, from http://www.nagb.org/publications/frameworks.html
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards of school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
Nickerson, R. S. (1999). Enhancing creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 392–430). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Orion, N., & Hofstein, A. (1994). Factors that influence learning during a scientific field trip in a natural environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 1097–1119.
Pelczer, I., Singer, F. M., & Voica, C. (2013a). Cognitive framing: A case in problem posing. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 78, 195–199.
Pelczer, I., Singer, F. M., & Voica, C. (2013b). Teaching highly able students in a common class: Challenges and limits. In B. Ubuz, C. Haser, & M. A. Mariotti (Eds.), Proceedings of CERME 8 (pp. 1235–1244). Antalya, Turkey: ERME.
Poincaré, H. (1913). The foundations of science. New York, NY: The Science Press.
Poincaré, H. (1948). Science and method. New York, NY: Dover.
Prouse, H. L. (1967). Creativity in school mathematics. The Mathematics Teacher, 60, 876–879.
Scott, W. A. (1962). Cognitive complexity and cognitive flexibility. Sociometry, 25, 405–414.
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.
Silver, E. A. (1994). On mathematical problem posing. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 19–28.
Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity though instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. International Reviews on Mathematical Education, 29, 75–80.
Silver, E. A., & Marshall, S. P. (1989). Mathematical and scientific problem solving: Findings, issues and instructional implications. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 265–290). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Singer, F. M. (2006). A cognitive model for developing a competence-based curriculum in secondary education. In A. Crisan (Ed.), Current and future challenges in curriculum development: Policies, practices and networking for change (pp. 121–141). Bucharest, Romania: Humanitas Educational.
Singer, F. M. (2007). Balancing globalisation and local identity in the reform of education in Romania. In B. Atweh, M. Borba, A. Barton, D. Clark, N. Gough, C. Keitel, C. Vistro-Yu, & R. Vithal (Eds.), Internalisation and globalisation in mathematics and science education (pp. 365–382). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Singer, F. M. (2012). Exploring mathematical thinking and mathematical creativity through problem posing. In R. Leikin, B. Koichu, & A. Berman (Eds.), Exploring and advancing mathematical abilities in high achievers (pp. 119–124). Haifa, Israel: University of Haifa.
Singer, F. M., Ellerton, N. F., Cai, J., & Leung, E. (2011). Problem posing in mathematics learning and teaching: A research agenda. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 137–166). Ankara, Turkey: PME.
Singer, F. M., Pelczer, I., & Voica, C. (2011). Problem posing and modification as a criterion of mathematical creativity. In M. Pytlak, T. Rowland, & E. Swoboda (Eds.), Proceedings of the CERME 7 (pp. 1133–1142). Rzeszów, Poland: University of Rzeszów.
Singer, F. M., & Sarivan, L. (Eds.). (2006). QUO VADIS ACADEMIA? Reference points for a comprehensive reform of higher education (In Romanian, with a synthesis in English). Bucharest, Romania: Sigma.
Singer, F. M., & Voica, C. (2011) Creative contexts as ways to strengthen mathematics learning. In M. Anitei, M. Chraif, & C. Vasile (Eds.), Proceedings PSIWORLD 2011. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 33, pp. 538–542). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.179
Singer, F. M., & Voica, C. (2013). A problem-solving conceptual framework and its implications in designing problem-posing tasks. ESM, 83(1), 9–26. doi:10.1007/s10649-012-9422-x.
Singh, B. (1988). Teaching-learning strategies and mathematical creativity. Delhi, India: Mittal.
Smilansky, J. (1984). Problem solving and the quality of invention: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(3), 377–386.
Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1992). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction (pp. 57–75). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sriraman, B. (2004). The characteristics of mathematical creativity. The Mathematics Educator, 14(1), 19–34.
Sriraman, B. (2009). The characteristics of mathematical creativity. The International Journal on Mathematics Education [ZDM], 41, 13–27.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1991). Creating creative minds. Phi Delta Kappan, 72, 608–614.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Steinberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Stoyanova, E., & Ellerton, N. F. (1996). A framework for research into students’ problem posing. In P. Clarkson (Ed.), Technology in mathematics education (pp. 518–525). Melbourne, Australia: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms, technical manual. Lexington, MA: Ginn.
Voica, C., & Singer, F. M. (2012). Problem modification as an indicator of deep understanding. Paper presented to Topic Study Group 3 “Activities and Programs for Gifted Students,” at the 12th International Congress for Mathematics Education (ICME-12). ICME-12 Pre-proceedings (pp. 1533–1542). Retrieved from http://icme12.org/upload/UpFile2/TSG/1259.pdf
Voica, C., & Singer, F. M. (2013). Problem modification as a tool for detecting cognitive flexibility in school children. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(2), 267–279. doi:10.1007/s11858-013-0492-8.
Yuan, X., & Sriraman, B. (2011). An exploratory study of relationships between students’ creativity and mathematical problem posing abilities: Comparing Chinese and U.S. students. In B. Sriraman & K. Lee (Eds.), The elements of creativity and giftedness in mathematics (pp. 5–28). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Problem 1 (posed by Diana, grade 4): On the planet Zingo live several types of aliens: with two or three eyes, with two or three ears, and with five or six hands. They are green or red. How many aliens should shake hands with Mimo to be sure that he shook hands with at least two of the same type?
Problem 2 (posed by Emilia, grade 4): In the Infinite king’s castle there are 43 corridors with 18 rooms each. Each room has 52 windows. At every window, there are three princesses. How many princesses are in the Infinite king’s castle?
Problem 3 (posed by Malina, grade 4): In Princess Rose’s jewelry boxes there are sapphires, emeralds, and rubies. 27 are not rubies, 31 are not emeralds, and 32 are not sapphires. In total, there are 45 jewels. How many jewels of each kind does Princess Rose have?
Problem 4 (posed by Paul, grade 4): If a group of students sits by two at their desks, seven students remain standing, and if they are placed by three at the same desks, seven desks remain free. How many students and how many desks are there in the classroom?
Problem 5 (posed by Sabina, grade 4): In the Fairies’ Glade, live 60 unicorns and fairies. They have 160 legs in total. How many beings of each kind are there?
Problem 6 (posed by Sergiu, grade 4): One day, the plane leaves Cluj [a city in Romania] to go to Japan. It departs at sharp hour in the morning, when the hour and the minute hands of a clock form a right angle. The hour hand points to a number bigger than 4. This plane travels at 60 km per hour, and the distance Cluj-Japan is 540 km. In the plane climbed three times more men than women, who are 24,484 people. The cost for a man’s tickets is the first odd number greater than 7. Women’s tickets cost as double of 3 added with 4 and the result divided by 2. (A) When did the plane leave Cluj? (B) When did the plane arrive in Japan? (C) How many men boarded the plane? (D) How many women boarded the plane? How much money did the pilot receive, if he received all the money, without 3,000 of total?
Problem 7 (posed by Tudor, grade 4): On a farm, there are two cows, some geese and horses, a total of 86 heads and 328 feet. How many horses are there at the farm?
Problem 8 (posed by Victor, grade 4): In the world of letters, each letter represents a number. M is two times greater than N, and the difference between these two letters is equal to A. A is less than B by seven, and the sum of A and B is neither bigger nor smaller than X. If we add two to X, we get Y. The sum of X and Y equals Z. Knowing that Z − (A: O + P: P + Q: Q + A: R) = 30, find M × N.
Problem 9 (posed by Alin, grade 5): (A poem!) If one places three cakes in each box/There’ll be three cakes left/If one places five cakes in each box/There’ll be an empty box left. (…) How many boxes and how many cakes/Do I put on the shelves?
Problem 10 (posed by Cosma, grade 5): Two boys need £67 to buy a game. The price of the game decreases by 50%. If the first boy pays three times more than the second does, how much money should each pay?
Problem 11 (posed by Andrei, grade 6): On the planet Uranus in the T316B2 city, there are less than 101 and more than 49 aliens. 1/2 of them are red, 2/7 are green, 1/14 are yellow, and the rest are blue. How many aliens live in E943S4 city, the capital of the planet, if their number is 149 times greater than the count of blue aliens from T316B2?
Problem 12 (posed by Cosmin, grade 6): P⋅R⋅I⋅C⋅E⋅P⋅I⋅P⋅R⋅O⋅B⋅L⋅E⋅M⋅A = x. Knowing that different letters represent different digits, find the last digit of the number x. (He multiplies the letters meaning YOU UNDERSTAND THE PROBLEM.)
Problem 13 (posed by Cristiana, grade 6): Maria has to solve the following problem: “4, 14, 1114, 3114, 132114, 1113122114, … What is the next term of the sequence?” The mathematics teacher gave her some advice: “You must empty your mind of all other mathematical information.” Can you help Maria to solve the problem?
Problem 14 (posed by Cristiana, grade 6): Maya the puppy has six bones. She wants to make four equilateral triangles out of these six bones, but she forgot one essential rule: one has to think out of the box. Can you help her?
Problem 15 (posed by Maria, grade 6): A number is “special” if it can be written as both a sum of two consecutive integers and a sum of three consecutive integers. Prove that: (a) 2,001 is special, and 3,001 is not special, (b) the product of two special numbers is special, (c) if the product of two numbers is special, then at least one of them is special.
Problem 16 (posed by Mihai, grade 6): Because the sixth-grade students were the best, they received a prize consisting in 1 h free on paintball field. The field has the dimensions 80 m × 120 m, and two people are able (and allowed) to shoot one another if they are at no more than 29 m distance. Prove that howsoever 26 students place themselves on the ground, at least 3 get shot.
Problem 17 (posed by Nandor, grade 6): Dan has a 24 hour display digital clock that is broken: the first digit of the hours’ counter and the last digit of the minutes’ one get switched every 5 hours. Example: if switch occurs at 17:42, the clock will show 24:71. The clock continues to run correctly after that and stops at 99:99, when it gives an error (1 hour is transformed in 100 minutes). If the clock breaks when the correct time of the day is 10:10, what will be the time before giving the error?
Problem 18 (posed by Radu, grade 6): Prove that any parallelogram can be divided into 16,384 congruent parallelograms.
Problem 19 (posed by Teofil, grade 6): In 2011, 300 students went on the field trip. Knowing that the percentage of girls was 45%, find the number of boys who participated.
Problem 20 (posed by Vlad, grade 6): A new quarter was built near a forest. The residents put their garbage in waste containers with a capacity of 750 kg each. At every 10 kg of garbage throw away by the residents, 4 kg disappear, being consumed by bears leaving in the forest. The residents produce 20 kg of garbage per hour. (a) Find out how long it take to fill a waste container; (b) Knowing that in the neighborhood live 500 families that fill 86 containers per month, that each family should pay 7.8 euros garbage fee, but only 400 families are fair and pay, calculate how much money is collected as garbage fees in a month.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Singer, F.M., Voica, C. (2015). Is Problem Posing a Tool for Identifying and Developing Mathematical Creativity?. In: Singer, F., F. Ellerton, N., Cai, J. (eds) Mathematical Problem Posing. Research in Mathematics Education. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_7
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6257-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6258-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)