Skip to main content

Assessing Public Participation Through Different Lens: The Case of Public Participation Geographic Information Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Government e-Strategic Planning and Management

Part of the book series: Public Administration and Information Technology ((PAIT,volume 3))

  • 1588 Accesses

Abstract

Public participation geographic information systems (PPGIS) pertain to the use of geographic information systems (GIS) to broaden public involvement in policymaking. Despite the importance of this topic, there is a lack of evaluation methods regarding the participation of the public through PPGISs. To fill this gap, the objective of this study is to analyze the level of e-democracy of PPGISā€™s websites and identify lessons that will enable PPGIs to develop appropriate strategies for e-democracy implementation and diffusion. To achieve the above-mentioned objectives, we analyze PPGISs websites; we also apply a multiple case study methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abelson, J. (2006). Assessing the impacts of public participation: Concepts, evidence, and policy implications, Ottawa. : Canadian Policy Research Networks Inc.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Arnstein, S. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), 216ā€“224.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Anttiroiko, A. V. (2007). Democratic e-Governance basic concepts, issue and future trends. Digest of Electronic Government Policy and Regulation, 30, 83ā€“90.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Cabiddu F. (2012). Misurazione dellā€™e-democracy nelle amministrazioni provinciali:un caso esplorativo. Azienda Pubblica, 2 (apr-giu), 159-186.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Cabiddu F. (2009). The use of web services for inclusive decision process: Towards the Enhancement of E-Democracy. In Alessandro Dā€™Atri; Domenico SaccĆ  (Eds.), Information Systems: People, Organizations, Institutions, and Technologies. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag, Springer.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Carver, S. (2003). The future of participatory approaches using geographic information: developing a research agenda for the 21st Century. URISA Journal, 15(1), 61ā€“71.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Censis ā€“ Rur. (2004).E-democracy: unā€™opportunitĆ  per tutti?. Roma: CENSIS.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Curry, M. (1995). Rethinking rights and responsibilities in geographic information systems: Beyond the Power of the Image. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 22(1), 58ā€“69.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Demchak C. C., Friis C., & La Porte T. M. (2000), Webbing governance: national differences in constructing the public face. In G. D. Garson (ed.), Handbook of public information systems. New York: Marcel Dekker Publishers.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Dunn, C. (2007). Participatory GIS: a people GIS? Progress in Human Geography, 31(5), 616ā€“637.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532ā€“550.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Floreddu, P., Cabiddu, F., & Pettinao, D. (2011). Public participation in environmental decision-making: the case of PPGIS. In A. Dā€™Atri, M. Ferrara, & J. F. George (Eds.), Information Technology And Innovation Trends In Organizations. Heidelberg, Springer.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Ganapati, S. (2011). Uses of public participation geographic information systems application in e-Governement. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 425ā€“434.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Gant D. B., & Gant J. P. (2002) Enhancing E-Service Delivery, E-government series, state web portals: delivering and financing e-service. Price waterhouse Coopers Endowment.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as voluntary sensors: Spatial Data Infrastructure in the World of Web 2.0. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 2, 24ā€“32.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Grƶnlund, A., (2009). ICT is not participation is not democracy: eParticipation development models revisited. In A. Macintosh, & E. Tambouris (Eds.), Proceedings of 1 st International Conference on Electronic Participation, ePart 2009 (pp. 12ā€“23). Berlin: Springer-LNCS 5694.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Grƶnlund, A. (2002). Electronic Government: design, Application and Management. London, UK: Idea Group Publishing.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Jankowsky, P. (2009). Toward participatory geographic information system for community based environmental decision making. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(6), 1966ā€“1971.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Jordan, G. (2002). GIS for community forestry user groups in Nepal: putting people before the technology. In W. Craig, T. Harris, & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 232ā€“245). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kingston, R. (2007). Public participation in local policy decision-making: the role of web-based mapping. Cartographic Journal, 44(2), 138ā€“144.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Hansen, H. S., & Prosperi, D. C. (2005). Citizen participation and internet GIS: Some recent advances. Computers Environment and Urban System, 9(6), 617ā€“629.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Holden, S. H. (2003). The evolution of information technology management at the federal level: implications for public administration. In G. D. Garson (Ed.), Public Information Technology Policy and Management Issues (pp. 53ā€“73). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Laituri, M. (2003). The Issue of Access: An Assessment, Guide for Evaluating Public Participation Geographic Information Science Case Studies. URISA Journal, 15(2), 25ā€“32.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Macintosh, A., & Whyte, A. (2008). Towards an evaluation framework for eParticipation. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 2(1), 16ā€“30.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Macintosh, A. (2004). Characterizing E-Participation in Policy-Making. Proceedings of the 37Ā° Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January 5ā€“8, 2004, Big Island, Hawaii.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Nyerges, T., Ramsey, K., & Wilson, M. (2006). Design Considerations for an Internet Portal to Support Public Participation in Transportation Improvement Decision Making. In S. Balram & S. Dragićević (Eds.), Collaborative Geographic Information Systems (pp. 208ā€“236). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • OECD. (2001). Citizens as Partners: Information, consultation and public participation in policy-making. Paris.: OECD.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Obermeyer, N. (1998). PPGIS: The Evolution of Public Participation GIS. Cartography and GIS, 25, 65ā€“66.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Peng, Z. R. (2001). Internet GIS for public participation. Environmental and Planning B., 28, 889ā€“905.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Pina, V., Torres, L., & Royo, S. (2007). Are ICTā€™s improving transparency and accountability in the EU regional and local development. Public Administration, 85(2), 449-472.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2000). Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Science, Technology and Human Values, 25(1), 3ā€“29.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Rowe, G., Marsh, R., & Frewer, L. J. (2004). Evaluation of a deliberative conference. Science, Technology and Human Values, 29(1), 88ā€“121.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • SƦbĆø, Ƙ., Rose, J., & Skiftenes Flak, L. (2008). The shape of eParticipation: characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly, 25(3), 400ā€“428.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Sieber, R. (2006). Public participation geographic information systems: a literature review and framework. Annals of Association of American Geographers, 96(3), 491ā€“507.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Schlossberg, M., & Shuford, E. (2003). Delineating ā€œPublicā€ and ā€œParticipationā€ in PPGIS. URISA Journal, 16(2), 15ā€“26.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • The EcoCities Spatial Portal (http://www.ppgis.manchester.ac.uk/ecocities/).

  • Tulloch, D. L., & Shapiro, T. (2003). The intersection of data access and public participation: impacting GIS usersā€™ success? URISA Journal, 15(2), 55ā€“60.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Turner, A., & Forrest, B. (2008). Where 2.0: The State of the Geospatial Web.,http://radar.oreilly.com/research/where2-report.html

  • Yildiz, M. (2007). e-Government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), 646ā€“665.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Yin, R. K. (2008). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paola Barbara Floreddu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Floreddu, P.B., Francesca, C. (2014). Assessing Public Participation Through Different Lens: The Case of Public Participation Geographic Information Systems. In: Anthopoulos, L., Reddick, C. (eds) Government e-Strategic Planning and Management. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 3. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8462-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics