Skip to main content

A Road Map for Computational Surgery: Challenges and Opportunities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Computational Surgery and Dual Training
  • 859 Accesses

Abstract

This paper introduces the fundamental concepts of computational surgery—Garbey et al. [Computational surgery and dual training, Springer, XVI, 315pp (Hardcover, ISBN: 978-1-4419-1122-3, 2009), 2010]—and proposes a road map for progress in this new multidisciplinary field of applied investigation. Recognizing this introduction will serve as common ground for discussion for both communities, surgeons and computational scientists, the scope of the presentation is broad rather than deep. Indeed, the field of computational surgery is sufficiently young that even the definition of computational surgery is still in the making. In this introduction, we propose multiple areas of investigation where the intersection of surgery and computational sciences is clearly in practice at the present time, though surprisingly unrecognized to date. We present examples of these intersections and demonstrate the usefulness and novelty of computational surgery as a new field of research. While some of the elements we present may be considered as basic for a specialized investigator, the simplicity of the presentation is intended as a proof of principle that basic concepts in computational sciences are of core value in solving many existing problems in clinical surgery; we also hope this initial evaluation will highlight potential obstacles and challenges. As the digital revolution transforms the working environment of the surgeon, close collaboration between surgeons and computational scientists is not only unavoidable but also essential to harness the capabilities of both fields to optimize the surgical care. We believe that this new collaboration will allow the community not only to develop the predictive models for the outcomes of surgery but also to enhance the process of surgery—from procedural planning, to execution of procedures and technology interfaces, to assessment of the healing process—investigations that will potentially provide great impact on patient care that far beyond the operating room.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. LeRoy Heinrichs W, Srivastava S, Montgomery K, Dev P (2004) The fundamental manipulations of surgery: a structured vocabulary for designing surgical curricula and simulators. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11(4):450–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Paré A (1983) Oeuvres completes remises en ordre et en franais moderne. In de Bissy F, Guerrand R-H (eds) Union latine d’edition, Paris (3 tomes et un index)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Satava RM (1998) Cybersurgery: advanced technologies for surgical practice, Protocols in general surgery series. Wiley-Liss, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, Rubino F, Mutter D, Vix M, Butner SE, Smith MK (2001) Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 413:379–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clapworthy G, Viceconti M, Coveney PV, Kohl P (2008) The Virtual Physiological Human: building a framework for computational biomedicine I. Editorial. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 366(1878):29758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Padoy N, Blum T, Ahmadi SA, Feussner H, Berger MO, Navab N (2012) Statistical modeling and recognition of surgical workflow. Med Image Anal 16(3):632–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Swanson KR, Alvord EC Jr, Murray JD (2000) A quantitative model for differential motility of gliomas in grey and white matter. Cell Prolif 33:317–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Murray JD (2003) Mathematical biology: II spatial models and biomedical applications, 3rd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Silbergeld DL, Chicoine MR (1997) Isolation and characterization of human malignant glioma cells from histologically normal brain. J. Neurosurg 86(3):525–31

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kelley PJ, Hunt C (1994) The limited value of Cytoreductive surgery in elderly patients with malignant gliomas, J. Neurosurg 34:62–67

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rockne R, Rockhill JK, Mrugala M, Spence AM, Kalet I, Hendrickson K, Lai A, Cloughesy T, Alvord EC Jr, Swanson KR (2010) Predicting the efficacy of radiotherapy in individual glioblastoma patients in vivo: a mathematical modelling approach. Phys Med Biol 55(12):3271–3285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang C, Rockhill JK, Mrugala M, Peacock DL, Lai A, Jusenius K, Wardlaw JM, Cloughesy T, Spence AM, Rockne R, Alvord EC Jr, Swanson KR (2009) Prognostic significance of growth kinetics in newly diagnosed glioblastomas revealed by combining serial imaging with a novel biomathematical model. Cancer Res 69(23):9133–9140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chaplain MAJ (2008) Modelling aspects of cancer growth: insight from mathematical and numerical analysis and computational simulation, multiscale problems in the life sciences. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer Verlag 1940:147–200

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cristini V, Lowengrub J (2010) Multiscale modeling of cancer: an integrated experimental and mathematical modeling approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Gatenby RA, Gillies RJ, Brown JS (2010) The evolutionary dynamics of cancer prevention. Nat Rev Cancer 10:526–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lefor A (2011) Computational oncology. Jpn J Clin Oncol 41(8):937–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Colin T, Iollo A, Lombardi D, Saut O (2012) System identification in tumour growth modeling using semi-empirical eigenfunctions. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 22(6):1250003–1250001

    Google Scholar 

  18. Benzekry S, Andre N, Benabdallah A, Ciccolini J, Faivre C, Hubert F, Barbolosi D (2012) Modeling the impact of anticancer agents on metastatic spreading. Math Model Nat Phenom 7(1):306–336

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Berceli SA, Tran-Son-Tay R, Garbey M, Jiang Z (2009) Hemodynamically driven vein graft remodeling: a systems biology approach. Vascular 17(S1):24–31

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gibbons GH, Dzau VJ (1994) The emerging concept of vascular remodeling. N Engl J Med 330(20):1431–1438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hwang M, Garbey M, Berceli SA, Tran Son Tay R (2009) Ruled-based simulation of multi-cellular biological systems – a review of modeling techniques. Cell Mol Bioeng 2(3):285–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hwang M, Berceli SA, Garbey M, Kim NH, Tran Son Tay R (2012) The dynamics of vein graft remodeling induced by hemodynamic forces – a mathematical model. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 11(3–4):411–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Budrukkar A, Sarin R, Shrivastava S, Deshpande D, Dinshaw K (2007) Cosmesis, late sequelae and local control after breast-conserving therapy: influence of type of tumour bed boost and adjuvant chemotherapy. Clin Oncol 19:596–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pleijhuis R, Graafland M, deVries J, Bart J, deJong J, van Dam G (2009) Obtaining adequate surgical margins in breast-conserving therapy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: current modalities and future directions. Ann Surg Oncol 16(10):2717–2730. doi:10.1245/s10434-009-0609-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Azar FS, Metaxas DN, Schnall MD (1999) A finite element model of the breast for predicting mechanical deformations during interventional procedures. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med 7:1084

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chung J-H (2008) Modelling mammographic mechanics. Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dormand EL, Banwell PE, EE Goodacre T (2005) Radiotherapy and wound healing. Int Wound J 2(2):112–117 (Blackwell Publishing Ltd and Medicalhelplines.com Inc)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mi Q, Riviere B, Clermont G, Steed DL, Vodovotz Y (2007) Agentbased model of inflammation and wound healing: insights into diabetic foot ulcer pathology and the role of transforming growth factor-β1. Wound Repair Regen 15:671–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Peirce SM (2008) Computational and mathematical modeling of angiogenesis. Microcirculation 15:739–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rodriguez E, Hoger A, McCulloch A (1994) Stress-dependent finite growth in soft elastic tissues. J Biomech 27(4):455–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Garbey M, Bass B, Berceli S (2012) Multiscale mechanobiology modeling for surgery assessment. Acta Mech Sin 28(4):1176–1192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Garbey M, Salmon R, Thanoon D, Bass B (2013) Multiscale modeling and distributed computing to predict cosmesis outcome after a lumpectomy. J Comput Phys 244:321–335 (available on line 23 August 2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially funded by the Methodist Research Institute, the Partner University Funds and the Atlantis Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. L. Bass .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bass, B.L., Garbey, M. (2014). A Road Map for Computational Surgery: Challenges and Opportunities. In: Garbey, M., Bass, B., Berceli, S., Collet, C., Cerveri, P. (eds) Computational Surgery and Dual Training. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8648-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8648-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8647-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8648-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics