Skip to main content

Introduction to Information Systems Models and Methodologies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
High Level Models and Methodologies for Information Systems
  • 1877 Accesses

Abstract

As information technology (IT) permeates more and more aspects of human life, information systems (IS) have grown to become an essential component of organizational management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alter, S. (2008). Defining Information Systems as work systems: Implications for the IS field. Business Analytics and Information Systems, Paper 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avison, D. E., & Fitzgerald, G. (1995). Information systems development: Methodologies, techniques and tools, 2nd edn. London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avison, D. E., & Taylor, V. (1997). Information Systems development methodologies: A classification according to problem situation. Journal of Information Technology, 12, 73–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balaji, S., & Murugaiyan, M. (2012). Waterfall vs. V-Model vs. Agile: A comparative study on SDLC. International Journal of Information Technology and Business Management, 2(1), 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballantine, J., Bonner, M., Levy, M., Martin, A., Munro, I., & Powell, P. (1996). The 3-D model of Information Systems success: The search for the dependent variable continues. Information Resources Management Journal, 9(4), 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, B. (1988). A Spiral model of software development and enhancement. IEEE Computer, 21(5), 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britts, W. (2011). The relationship between organizational and national culture and the use and effectiveness of systems development methodologies (Master’s thesis, North-West University). Retrieved from http://dspace.nwu.ac.za/handle/10394/9165

  • Card, S., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1983). The Psychology of human computer interaction. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user Information Systems: Theory and results. (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology). Retrieved from http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/15192

  • DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information Systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of Information Systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, Spring 2003, 19(4), 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gable, G., Sedera, D., & Chan, T. (2008). Re-conceptualizing Information Systems success: The IS-impact measurement model. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(7), 377–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodland, M., & Riha, K. (1999). SSADM—An introduction. Retrieved from http://www.dcs.bbk.ac.uk/~steve/1/index.htm

  • Gottesdiener, E. (1995). RAD realities: Beyond the hype to how RAD really works. Application Development Trends, August 1995, 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C., Thompson, J., & Edwards, H. (1995). The use, limitation and customization of structured systems development methods in the United Kingdom. Information and Software Technology, 37(9), 467–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim, R., & Klein, H. (1989). Four paradigms of information systems development. Communications of the ACM, 32(10), 1199–1216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iivari, J. (2002). An empirical test of the DeLone-McLean model of Information System success. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 36(2), 8–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iivari, J., & Hirschheim, R. (1996). Analyzing Information Systems development: A comparison and analysis of eight IS development approaches. Information Systems, 21(7), 551–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iivari, J., Hirschheim, R., & Klein, H. (1998). A paradigmatic analysis contrasting Information Systems development approaches and methodologies. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 164–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iivari, J., Hirschheim, R., & Klein, H. (2001). A dynamic framework for classifying Information Systems development methodologies and approaches. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(3), 179–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isakowitz, T., Stohr, E. A., & Balasubramaninan, P. (1995). RMM: A methodology for structured Hypermedia design. Communications of the ACM, 38(8), 34–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurian, D., Gallupe, R., & Diaz, J. (2000). Taking stock: Measuring Information Systems success. ASAC-IFSAM-2000 Proceedings, 21, 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, V., & Satao, K. (2012). Comparing various SDLC models and the new proposed model on the basis of available methodology. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 2(4), 170–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munassar, N., & Govardhan, A. (2010). Comparison between five models of software engineering. International Journal of Computer Science Issues, 7(5), 94–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murugesan, S., Deshpande, Y., Hansen, S., & Ginige, A. (2001). Web engineering: A new discipline for development of Web-based systems. In S. Murugesan & Y. Deshpande (Eds.), Web engineering: Managing diversity and complexity of Web application development (pp. 3–13). Berlin, Heildelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability inspection methods. Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 413–414). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. (1993). Things that make us smart. : Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunamaker, J., Chen, M., & Purdin, T. (1991). Systems development in Information Systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(3), 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson Jr., F. (2004). Life cycles for system acquisition. In Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems, Systems Engineering and Management for Sustainable Development (pp. 82–110). Retrieved from http://www.eolss.net/ebooks/Sample%20Chapters/C15/E1-28-01-02.pdf

  • Pirolli, P., & Card, S. (1999). Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106, 643–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royce, W. (1970). Managing the development of large software systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE WESCON, August 1970 (pp. 1–9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez, A., & Mejía, A. (2008). Learning to support learning together: An experience with the Soft systems methodology. Educational Action Research, 16(1), 109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, M. (2001). The use of SSADM (Structured Systems Analysis and Design Methodology) as a standard methodology on information systems projects. Retrieved from http://www.grin.com/en/e-book/106034/the-use-of-ssadm-structured-systems-analysis-and-design-methodology-as

  • Schümmer, J., Schuckmann, C., Bibbó, L., & Zapico, J. (1999). Collaborative Hypermedia design patterns in OOHDM. In Proceedings of the HT99 Workshop on Hypermedia Development —Design Patterns in Hypermedia, Darmstadt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwabe, D., Pontes, R. A., & Moura, I. (1999). OOHDM-Web: An environment for implementation of Hypermedia applications in the WWW. ACM SigWEB Newsletter, 8(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seddon, P. B. (1997). A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS success. Information Systems Research, 8(3), 240–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tumbas, P., & Matkovic, P. (2006). Agile vs. Traditional methodologies in developing Information Systems. Management Information Systems, 1(2006), 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • VersionOne (2013). 8th Annual State of Agile development survey. Retrieved from http://stateofagile.versionone.com/

  • Vidgen, R., Avison, D., Wood, B., & Wood-Harper, T. (2002). Developing web information systems. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zachman, J. A. (1987). A framework for Information Systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 26(3), 276–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro Isaias .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Isaias, P., Issa, T. (2015). Introduction to Information Systems Models and Methodologies. In: High Level Models and Methodologies for Information Systems. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9254-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics