Abstract
Visual perception is probably a simultaneous local and global process. Local signals define the global picture, and the global percept defines which local features are the signal and which ones are noise. This mode of operation pertains to many aspects of vision, and particularly to stereoscopic vision. The global 3D percept derived from a random dot stereogram (RDS) display is assebmbled from local patches. In this article, we claim that the local patches on which stereoscopic visual perception depend, could in fact be identified as the hypercolumns of the visual cortex.
Stereoscopic vision is extremely precise in detecting minute differences between adjacent depth planes, but quite imprecise in estimating absolute depth. In this paper, we address the issue of the spatial acuity (and not the stereo acuity) of stereopsis. Static RDS (random dot stereograms) stimuli were used to find the spatial grain in which human stereoscopic vision operates. Using psychophysical experiments it was found that foveally, stimuli smaller than 8’ cannot be accurately perceived. For other eccentricities, it was found that this threshold is inversely proportional to the Cortical Magnification factor. We interpret this spatial size limit, which is an order of magnitude larger than visual spatial acuity, as an indication that stereopsis is an area based comparison rather than a point process, and discuss the relations between the cortical “patch” size that corresponds to this 8’ limit and Ocular Dominance Columns.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
A. Arditi. Binocular vision. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J. P. Thomas, editors, Handbook of perception and performance: Vol. 1. Sensory processes and perception, pages 23.1–23.41. Wiley, New York, 1986.
R. Blake and H. R. Wilson. Neural models of stereoscopic vision. Trends in Neuroscience, 14:445–452, 1991.
P. Burt and B. Julesz. A disparity gradient limit for binocular fusion. Science, 208:615–617, 1980.
L. K. Cormack, S. B. Stevenson, and C. M. Schor. Interocular correlation, luminance contrast and cyclopean processing. Vision Research, 31:2195–2207, 1991.
A. Cowey and E. T. Rolls. Human cortical magnification factor and its relation to visual acuity. Exp. Brain Res., 3:447–454, 1974.
P. M. Daniel and D. Whitteridge. The representation of the visual field on the calcarine cortex in baboons and monkeys. J. Physiol., 148:33–34P, 1959.
P. M. Daniel and D. Whitteridge. The representation of the visual field on the cerebral cortex in monkeys. J. Physiol, 159:203 221, 1961.
N. Drasdo. The neural representation of visual space. Nature, 256:554–556, 1977.
J. P. Frisby and J. E. W. Mayhew. Contrast sensitivity function for stereopsis. Perception, 7:423–429, 1978.
D. L. Halpern and R. Blake. How contrast affects stereoacuity. Perception, 17:483–495, 1988.
Y. Hermush and Y. Yeshurun. Spatial gradient limit on perception of multiple motion. Perception, 24:1247–1256, 1995.
J. C. Horton, L. R. Dagi, E. P. McCrane, and F. M. de Monasterio. Arrangement of ocular dominance columns in human visual-cortex. Archives of Ophthalmology, 108:1025–1031, 1990.
B. Julesz. Binocular depth perception of computer- generated patterns. Bell syst. Tech. J., 39:1125 1162, 1960.
L.L. Kontsevich and C.W. Tyler. Analysis of stereothresholds for stimuli below 2.5 c/deg. Vision Research, 34:2317–2329, 1994.
G. E. Legge and Y. Gu. Stereopsis and contrast. Vision Research, 29:989–1004, 1989.
M. S. Livingstone, S. Nori, D. C. Freeman, and D. H. Hubel. Stereopsis and binocularity in the squirrel monkey. Vision Research, 35:345–354, 1995.
K. O. Ludwig, H. Neumann, and B. Neumann. Local stereoscopic depth estimation. Image and vision computing, 12:16–35, 1994.
S. P. McKee, J. M. Harris, and H. S. Smallman. Minimum size for human disparity correlation. In Invest. Opht. Vis. Science, volume 36, 1715–663, 1995.
S. P. McKee, D. M. Levi, and S. F. Bowne. The imprecision of stereopsis. Vision Research, 30:1763–1779, 1990.
R. Oehler. Spatial interactions in the rhesus monkey retina: a behavioural study using the westheimer paradigm. Exp. Brain Res., 59:217–225, 1985.
K. N. Ogle. Researches in Binocular Vision. Saunders, Philadelphia, 1950.
K. N. Ogle. Disparity limits of stereopsis. Archives of Ophthalmology, 48:50–60, 1952.
L. A. Olzak and J. P. Thomas. Seeing spatial patterns. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J. P. Thomas, editors, Handbook of perception and performance: Vol. 1. Sensory processes and perception, pages 7.1-7.56. Wiley, New York, 1986.
A. J. Parker and M. J. Hawken. Two-dimensional spatial structure of receptive fields in monkey striate cortex. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 5:598–605, 1988.
J. Rovamo and V. Virsu. An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor. Exp. Brain Res., 37:495–510, 1979.
CM. Schor, I.C. Wood, and J. Ogawa. Spatial tuning of static and dynamic local stereopsis. Vision Research, 24:573–578, 1984.
R. Schumer and L. Ganz. Independent stereoscopic chanels for different extents of spatial pooling. Vision Research, 19:1303–1314, 1979.
D. J. Tolhurst and L. Ling. Magnification factors and the organization of the human striate cortex. Human neorobiology, 6:247–254, 1988.
C. W. Tyler. Stereoscopic vision: Cortical limitations and a disparity scaling effect. Science, 181:276–278, 1973.
C. W. Tyler. Depth perception in disparity gratings. Nature, 251:140–142, 1974.
C. W. Tyler and B. Julesz. On the depth of the cyclopean retina. Exp. Brain Res., 40:196–202, 1980.
V. Virsu and J. Rovamo. Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor. Exp. Brain Res., 37:475–494, 1979.
G. Westheimer. Spatial interaction in the domain of disparity signals in human stereoscopic vision. J. Physiol., 370:619–629, 1986.
G. Westheimer. The ferrier lecture, 1992. seeing depth with two eyes: stereopsis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 257:205–214, 1994.
H.R. Wilson, R. Blake, and D.L. Halpern. Coarse spatial scales constrain the range of binocular fusion on fine scale. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 8:229–236, 1991.
H.R. Wilson, R. Blake, and J. Pokorny. Limits of binocular fusion in the short wave sensitive cones. Vision Research, 28:555–562, 1988.
Y. Yeshurun and E. L. Schwartz. Cepstral filtering on a columnar image architecture: a fast algorithm for binocular stereo segmentation. IEEE trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine intelligence, 11:759–767, 1989.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schlesinger, B.Y., Yeshurun, Y. (2002). Spatial Size Limits in Stereoscopic Vision. In: Cantoni, V., Marinaro, M., Petrosino, A. (eds) Visual Attention Mechanisms. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0111-4_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0111-4_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4928-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0111-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive