Skip to main content

A Rationale for Assessments of Election Programmes

  • Chapter
Economic Assessment of Election Programmes

Abstract

The consequences of many policies are complicated and difficult to foresee. In the Netherlands, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis (CPB) assists the government with assessing the consequences of economic policy. In addition, CPB calculates the economic consequences of party programmes before each election for parliament. The main objective of this chapter is to provide a rationale for the latter practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Austen-Smith, D., and J.S. Banks (1996), Information Aggregation, Rationality, and the Condorcet Jury Theorem, American Political Science Review, 90(1), 34–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, W.C. (1967), Uncertainty and the Effectiveness of Policy, The American Economic Review, 57(2), 411–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Christodoulakis. N, and F. van der Ploeg (1987), Macro-Dynamic Policy Formulation with Conflicting Views of the Economy: A Synthesis of Optimal Control and Feedback Design, International Journal of Systems Science, 18(2), 449–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cukierman, A., and Y. Spiegel (1998), When Do Representative and Direct Democracies Lead to Similar Policy Choices?, Center Discussion Paper No. 98115, Tilburg: Tilburg University

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957), An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper & Row

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, M.P. (1997), Voting Behavior, in D.C. Mueller (Ed.), Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook, Cambridge (U.K.) et cetera: Cambridge University Press, 391–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, J.E. (1993), Economic Policy, Economic Performance, and Elections, The American Economic Review, 83(1), 27–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S.E. (1962), The Economics of the Political Parties, New York: MacMillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladha, K.K. (1992), The Condorcet Jury Theorem, Free Speech, and Correlated Votes, American Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 617–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letterie, W., and O.H. Swank (1998), Economic Policy, Model Uncertainty and Elections, Economics and Politics, 10(1), 85–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (1999), The Information-Aggregation Approach to Political Institutions, European Economic Review, 43(4–6), 791–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, J.E. (1994), The Strategic Role of Party Ideology When Voters are Uncertain About How the Economy Works, American Political Science Review, 88(2), 327–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, C. (1995), The Politics of Persuasion When Voters Are Rational, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 97(3), 357–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swank, O.H. (1994), Partisan Views on the Economy, Public Choice, 81(1–2), 137–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swank, O.H., and B. Visser (2002), Delegation or Voting, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper TI 2002–005/1, Amsterdam et cetera: Tinbergen Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, J. (1974), The New Economics One Decade Older, Princeton: Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E.R. (1978), Political Control of the Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J.Q. (1989), Bureaucracy, New York: Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, H.P. (1988), Condorcet’s Theory of Voting, American Political Science Review, 82(4), 1231–1244

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Swank, O.H. (2003). A Rationale for Assessments of Election Programmes. In: Graafland, J.J., Ros, A.P. (eds) Economic Assessment of Election Programmes. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0290-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0290-6_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5006-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0290-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics