Skip to main content

Building Demand Models to Improve Environmental Policy Process

  • Chapter
Model-Based Reasoning

Abstract

Integrated assessment modeling is gaining favor in several countries as a way of informing policy processes. Examining modeling styles and assumptions from the viewpoint of policy making, this paper, following Rotmans (1998), distinguishes between “supply” models and “demand” models, treating supply models as “curiosity motivated” and demand models as examples of “missionoriented” science (Funtowicz and Ravetz, 1997). Models can be understood as communicative devices, similar to languages. A case study, based on research on the management of Lake Lanier in Northeastern Georgia, illustrates how failures of communication inhibit policy development. Competing interest groups employ differing mental models. A demand model might improve communication and cooperation by creating a shared model that clarifies these differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Auchmutey, J., Farther than the eye can see: It’s all Atlanta, Atlanta Journal-Constitution, April 1, 2001: A1, A12, A13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R., 1937.The Logical Syntax of Language, translated by A. Smeaton, Degan Paul Trench, Trubner & Co, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R., 1950, Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4:20–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R., 1955, On some concepts of pragmatics, Philosophical Studies 6:89–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency, 1997, Community-Based Environmental Protection: A Resource Book For Protecting Ecosystems and Communities, http://www.epa.gov/cbep/pdf/coverrev_OnlinePDF.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz, S. and Ravetz, J., 1994. The worth of a songbird: Ecological economics as a postnormal science, Ecological Economics 10:197–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz, S. and Ravetz, J., 1997, Science for the post-normal age, in: Perspectives on Ecological Integrity, L. Westra, ed., Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD, pp. 146–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L., Holling, C.S., and Light, A., 1955, Barriers and Bridges, Columbia, University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J., 1998, Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, translated by William Rehg, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C.S., 1978, Adaptive Monitoring and Management, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, T., 1987, Remapping the Chesapeake, The New American Land, September, October, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., 1993, Compass and Gyroscope, Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council, 1983, Risk Assessment in the Federal Government, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council, 1996, Understanding Risk, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B., 1977, On the metatheoretical nature of Carnap’s philosophy, Philosophy of Science 44:65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B., 1995a, Integration or reduction: Two approaches to environmental valuation, in: Environmental Pragmatism, A. Light and E. Katz, eds., Routledge Publishers, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B., 1995b, Ecological integrity and social values: At what scale? Ecosystem Health 1(4):228–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B., 1999, Pragmatism, adaptive management, and sustainability, Environmental Values 8:451 -466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B., in Preparation. Constructing sustainability.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B. and Hannon, B., 1998, Democracy and sense of place values, Philosophy and Geography, 3:119–146 (Philosophies of Place).

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B. and Steinemann, A., forthcoming, Environmental values and adaptive management, Environmental Values.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B. and Mills, S., in preparation, Community-based evaluation and planning in rapidly urbanizing watersheds: the case of lake lanier”, Urban Environmental Ethics, A. Light, ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plough, A. and Krimsky, S., .1990, The emergence of risk commnication studies: social and political context, in: Readings in Risk, T.S. Glickman and M. Gough, eds., Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V.O., 1953, 1961, Two dogmas of empiricism, in: From A Logical Point of View, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H.W.J., and Webber, M.M., 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning, Policy Sciences 4:155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans, J., 1998, Methods for IA: The 3 challenges and opportunities ahead, Environmental Modelling and Assessment 3:155–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans, J., Dowlatabadi, H., and Parson, E. A., 1997, Integrated assessment of climate change: Evaluation of methods and strategies, in: Human Choice and Climate Change: An International Social Science Assessment, S. Rayner and E. Malone, eds., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans, J., and Van Asselt, M.B.A., 1998, Integrated assessment: Current practices and challenges for the future, in: Ecological Economics and Integrated Assessment: A Participatory Process for including Equity, Efficiency, and Scale in Decision-Making for Sustainability, R. Costanza and S. Tognetti, eds., SCOPE, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sager, T., 1997, Planning and the liberal paradox: A democratic dilemma in social choice, Journal of Planning Literature 12(1): 16–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S.H., 1997. Integrated assessment modeling of climate change: Transparent rational tool for policy making or opaque screen hiding value-laden assumptions? Environmental Modeling and Assessment 2:229–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A., 1970a, Collective Choice and Social Welfare, Holden-Day, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A., 1970b, The impossibility of a Paretian liberal, Journal of Political Economy 78(1):152–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Norton, B.G. (2002). Building Demand Models to Improve Environmental Policy Process. In: Magnani, L., Nersessian, N.J. (eds) Model-Based Reasoning. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0605-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0605-8_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5154-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0605-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics