Abstract
The role of scent-marking in the maintenance of mammalian territories is well-documented (eg. Ralls, 1971; Brown and Macdonald, 1985; Gosling, 1982; Gosling and Roberts, in press). Scent marks are a form of status signal, advertising territory ownership, and recent evidence suggests they may also be condition-dependent signals of quality and competitive ability (Gosling et al., in press). In common with animal signals in other sensory modalities, scent marks thus provide a means of assessment which informs signal receivers about the signaller’s quality. Information about the location, density, freshness and chemical properties of scent marks are all likely to contribute to the appraisal of the signaller by the receiver before the participants meet. In a territorial context, the product of this appraisal may be a decision to avoid the risk of meeting the signaller by withdrawing from the territory, for example, if the signaller appears to be of far higher competitive ability. Alternatively, a receiver may defer a decision until it has more information, or until an opportunity arises to check this information in a face-to-face situation. Since scent mark detection often occurs in the signaller’s absence, receivers may need to confirm the identity of any opponent as the resource-holder before deciding on their next move. This can be achieved by comparing the odour of the marks with that of their opponent, a process known as scent-matching (Gosling, 1982,1990;Gosling and McKay, 1990). A positive match, which unambiguously confirms the owner’s status, may be sufficient to settle the contest conventionally and scent-marking thus helps to reduce the costs of territory defence (Gosling, 1986; Stenstrom 1998).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alberts A. C., 1992, Constraints on the design of chemical communication systems in terrestrial vertebrates, Am. Nat. 139 Suppl.:S62–S89.
Barrett, L., and Lowen, C. B., 1998, Random walks and the gas model: spacing behaviour of grey-cheeked mangabeys, Func. Ecol. 12, 857–865.
Barette, C., 1977, Scent-marking in captive muntjacs, Muntiacus reevesi, Anim. Behav. 25:536–541.
Bowyer, R. T., Vanbellenberghe, V., and Rock, K. R., 1994, Scent marking by Alaskan moose - characteristics and spatial distribution of rubbed trees, Can. J. Zool. 72: 2186–2192.
Brashares, J. S., and Arcese, P., 1999, Scent marking in a territorial African antelope: II. The economics of marking with faeces, Anim. Behav. 57:11–17.
Brown, R. E., and Macdonald, D. W., 1985, Social odours in mammals, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Feldman, H. N., 1994, Methods of scent marking in the domestic cat. Can. J. Zool. 72:1093–1099.
Gilbert, B. K., 1973. Scent marking and territoriality in pronghorn (Antilope americand) in Yellowstone National Park, Mammalia 37:25–33.
Gorman, M. L., 1990, Scent marking strategies in mammals, Rev. suisse. Zool. 97:3–29.
Gosling, L. M., 1972, The construction of antorbital gland marking sites by male oribi (Ourebia ourebia, Zimmerman 1783), Z Tierpsychol. 30:271–276.
Gosling, L. M., 1980, Defence guilds of savannah ungulates as a context for scent communication. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 45:195–212.
Gosling, L. M., 1981, Demarkation in a gerenuk territory: an economic approach, Z. Tierpsychol. 56:305–322.
Gosling, L. M., 1982, A reassessment of the function of scent marking in territories, Z. Tierpsychol. 60:89–118.
Gosling, L. M., 1986, Economic consequences of scent marking in mammalian territoriality, in: Chemical Signals in Vertebrates IV (D. Duvall, D. Müller-Schwarze, and R. M. Silverstein, eds.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 385–395.
Gosling, L. M., 1990, Scent marking by resource holders: alternative mechanisms for advertising the costs of competition, in: Chemical Signals in Vertebrates V(D.W. Macdonald, S. Natynczuk, and D. Muller-Schwarze, eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 315–328.
Gosling, L. M., and McKay, H. V., 1990, Competitor assessment by scent matching: an experimental test, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26:415–420.
Gosling, L. M., and Roberts, S. C., Scent-marking by male mammals: cheat-proof signals to competitors and mates, Adv. Stud. Behav. (in press)
Gosling, L. M., Roberts, S. C, Thornton, E. A., and Andrew, M. J., Life history costs of olfactory status signalling in mice, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. (in press)
Graf, W., 1956, Territorial ism in deer, J. Mammal. 37: 165–170.
Guilford, T., and Dawkins, M. S., 1991, Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals, Anim. Behav. 42:1–14.
Johansson, A., and Liberg, O., 1996, Functional aspects of marking behaviour by male roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), J. Mammal. 77:558–567.
Kappeler, P. M., 1998, To whom it may concern: the transmission and function of chemical signals in Lemur catta, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 42:411–421.
Kile, T. L., and Marchinton, R. L., 1977, White-tailed deer rubs and scrapes: spatial, temporal and physical characteristics and social role, Amer. Midl. Nat. 97:257–266.
Müller-Schwarze, D. M., 1974, Social functions of various scent glands in certain ungulates and the problems encountered in experimental studies of scent communication, in: The behaviour of ungulates and its relation to management (V. Geist, and F.R. Walther, eds.), IUCN, Morges, pp. 107–11.
Paquet, P. C., 1991, Scent marking behaviour of sympatric wolves (Canis lupus) and coyotes (C. latrans) in Riding Mountain National Park, Can. J. Zool. 69:1721–27.
Peters, R. P., and Mech, L. D., 1975, Scent-marking in wolves, Amer. Sci. 63:628–37.
Rails, K., 1971, Mammalian scent marking, Science 171:443–449.
Roberts, S. C., 1997, Selection of scent-marking sites by klipspringers (Oreotragus oreotragus), J. Zool. 243:555–564.
Roberts, S. C, 1998, Behavioural responses to scent marks of increasing age in klipspringer Oreotagus oreotragus, Ethology 104: 585–592.
Roberts, S. C, and Lowen, C., 1997, Optimal patterns of scent marks in klipspringer (Oreotragus oreotragus) territories, J. Zool. 243:565–578.
Rowe, C., 1999, Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent signals, Anim.Behav. 58:921–931.
Stenström, D., 1998, Mating behaviour and sexual selection in non-lekking fallow deer (Dama dama), PhD Thesis, University of Uppsala.
Walther, F. R., 1978, Mapping the structure and the marking system of a territory of the Thomson’s gazelle, E. Afr. Wildl. J. 16:167–176.
Waser, P. M., 1977, Cercocebus albigenus: site attachment, avoidance and inter-group spacing, Am. Nat. 110:911–935.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roberts, S.C., Gosling, L.M. (2001). The Economic Consequences of Advertising Scent Mark Location on Territories. In: Marchlewska-Koj, A., Lepri, J.J., Müller-Schwarze, D. (eds) Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 9. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0671-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0671-3_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5187-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0671-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive