Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International and Cultural Psychology Series ((ICUP))

Abstract

Personality testing in Turkey has escalated in recent years even though the number of tests with solid psychometric properties is very low. Tests developed or adapted in recent years show a tendency to reveal a structure similar to that of Five-Factor Model. The Turkish version of the NEO-PI-R produced a factor structure that had five factors and that was congruent with the original factor structure. The scores from the adult sample showed some discrepancies from the original normative sample. Correlations with age and gender differences were similar to those obtained in other studies. The discrepancies between the Turkish adult sample and the American normative sample are possibly functions of cultural differences as well as the contextual factors that were influential on the response patterns of the Turkish sample. A second study with bilingual respondents displayed high correlations between the scores on the English and Turkish versions of the NEO-PI-R, and there were significant differences between the two versions on four facet scores. These differences are interpreted in the framework of cultural contexts triggered by language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bayar, P. (1983). Atletlerin kişilik özellikleri [Personality characteristics of athletes]. Unpublished master’s thesis, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Segall, M. H., & Dasen, P. R. (1992). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blitz, R. C. (1975). An international comparison of women’s participation in the professions. The Journal of Developing Areas, 9, 499–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., Jr., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322–331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Demirtürk, P. (1987). A preliminary study towards the development of the Turkish form of the California Psychological Inventory. Unpublished master’s thesis. Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L.R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H. G., & Heilbrun, A. B., Jr. (1983). Adjective Check List manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosjean, F. (1992). Another view of bilingualism. In R. J. Harris (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 51–62). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gülgöz, S., Schrauf, R., & Rubin, D. R. (2001). Autobiographical memory in bilinguals. Unpublished manuscript, Koç University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuchert, J. W. P., Parker, W. D., Stumpf, H., & Myburgh, C. P. H. (2000). The Five-Factor Model of personality in South African college students. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 112–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holton, R. (2000). Globalization’s cultural consequences. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 570, 140–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • İmamoğlu, E. O., & Aygün, Z. K. (1999). 1970′lerden 1990′lara değerler: Üniversite düzeyinde gözlenen zaman, kuşak ve cinsiyet farkliliklan [Value preferences from 1970s to 1990s: Cohort, generation and gender differences at a Turkish university]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 14, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • İmamoğlu, O. & Yasak-Gültekin, Y. (1993). Gazetelerde kadin ve erkeğin temsil edilişi [Representations of men and women in newspapers]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 8, 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kağitçibaçi, Ç. (1990). Family and socialization in cross-cultural perspective: A model of change. In J. Berman (Ed.), Cross-cultural pespectives: Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1989 (pp. 135–200). Lincoln, NE: Nebraska University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kağitçibaşi, Ç. (1994). Psychology in Turkey. International Journal of Psychology, 29, 729–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kağitçibaşi, Ç. (1996a). Family and human development across cultures. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kağitçibaşi, Ç. (1996b). The autonomous-relational self: A new synthesis. European Psychologist, 1, 180–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiliç, M. (1987). Değişik psikolojik arazlara sahip olan ve olmayan öğrencilerin sorunlari [Problems of students with or without various psychological disorders.] Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuşdil, M. E., & Kağitçibaşi, Ç. (2000). Türk öğretmenlerin değer yönelimleri ve Schwartz değer kurami [Value orientations of Turkish teachers and Schwartz’s theory of values]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 15, 59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodhi, P. H., Deo, S., & Belhekar, V. M. (2002). The Five-Factor Model of personality: Measurement and correlates in the Indian context. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 227–248). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, R. & Martin, T. (1997). Gender differences in Extraversion, Neuroticism, and Psychoticism in 37 nations. Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 369–373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marian, V. & Neisser, U. (2000). Language-dependent recall of autobiographical memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 361–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mastor, K. A., Jin, P., & Cooper, M. (2000). Malay culture and personality. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R. (2001). Trait psychology and culture: Exploring intercultural comparisons. Journal of Personality, 69, 819–846.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997a). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997b). Conceptions and correlates of Openness to experience. In R. Hogan, J. A. Johnson, & S. R. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 825–847). San Diego, CA: Academic Press

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr., Ostendorf, F., Angleitner, A., Hřebičková, M., Avia, M. D., Sanz, J., Sánchez-Bernardos, M. L., Kuşdil, M. E., Woodfield, R., Saunders, P. R., & Smith, P. B. (2000). Nature over nurture: Temperament, personality, and lifespan development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 173–186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D. G., & Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy? Psychological Science, 6, 10–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öner, N. (1994). Türkiye’de kullamlan psikolojik testier [Psychological tests used in Turkey]. Istanbul, Boğaziçi University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özgüven, I. E. (1992). Hacettepe kişilik envanteri el kitabi [Hacettepe personality inventory manual]. Ankara, Turkey: Odak Matbaacilik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piedmont, R. L., & Chae, J. (1997). Cross-cultural generalizability of the Five-Factor Model of personality: Development and validation of the NEO-PI-R for Koreans. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 131–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savaşir, I. (1981). Minnesota çok yönlü kişilik envanteri el kitabi (Turk standardizasyonu) [Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory manual (Turkish standardization)]. Ankara, Turkey: Sevinç Matbaasi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savran, C. (1993). Sifat listesinin Türkiye koşullanna uygun dilsel eşdeğerlilik, geçerlik, güvenirlik ve norm çalişmasi [The linguistic equivalence, validity, reliability, and norm study for the Adjective Check List for Turkey]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savran, C., Balci, Z. (1996, September). Psikolojik danişma ve rehberlik eğitiminin danişman adaylarinin kişilik özellikleri üzerindeki etkisi [The effect of psychological counseling education on the personality characterisitcs of counselor candidates]. Paper presented at the Ninth National Congress of Psychology, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savran, C. (2001). Factor analysis of the dimensions of the Turkish adjective checklist. Unpublished manuscript, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmit, M. J., Ryan, A. M., Stierwalt, S. L., & Powell, A. B. (1995). Frame-of-reference effects on personality scale scores and criterion-related validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 607–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrauf, R. W. (2000). Bilingual autobiographical memory: Experimental studies and clinical cases. Culture & Psychology, 6, 387–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrauf, R. W., & Rubin, D. C. (1998). Bilingual autobiographical memory in older adult immigrants: A test of cognitive explanations of the reminiscence bump and the linguistic encoding of memories. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 437–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrauf, R. W. & Rubin, D. C. (2000). Internal languages of retrieval: The bilingual encoding of memories for the personal past. Memory and Cognition, 28, 616–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinangil, H. K., Savran, C., Ones, D. S., & Balci, Z. (1997) Public and private sector managers: Factors influencing personality characteristics and performance. Quaderni di Psicologia del Lavoro, 5, 194–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Somer, O. (1998). Türkçe’de kişilik özelliği tanimlayan sifatlann yapisi ve beş-faktör modeli [The structure of trait descriptive adjectives in Turkish language and the five-factor model]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 13, 17–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Somer, O., & Goldberg, L. R. (1999). The structure of Turkish trait-descriptive adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 431–450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sümer, H. C., Sümer, N., Çifci, D.S., & Demirutku, K. (2000). Subay kişilik özelliklerinin ölçülmesi ve yapi geçerliği çalişmasi [Measurement of officer personality attributes: A construct validity study]. Turk Psikoloji Dergisi, 15, 15–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Vol 3. Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tevrüz, S., & Türk Smith, Ş. (1996). Üniversite gençliğinin kişilik profilleri [Personality profiles of the university students]. In Y. Topsever & M. Göregenli (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eight National Congress of Psychology (pp. 99–113). Ankara: Turkish Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Türk Smith, Ş., & Tevrüz, S. (1998). Marmara Üniversitesi Öğrencileri Üniversité Gençliğini değerlendiriyor: Sevilen, sevilmeyen, tipik ve ideal öğrenci hangi özellikleri taşiyor? [Marmara University students evaluate university students: What characteristics do liked, disliked, typical, and ideal students have?]. In G. Okman-Fişek (Ed.), Proceedings of the Ninth National Congress of Psychology (pp. 421–430). Ankara: Turkish Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J. M. (2001). Birth cohort changes in extraversion: A cross-temporal meta-analysis, 1966–1993. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 735–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, D. & Gerong, A. (1999). Language of response and the spontaneous self-concept. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 115–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whorf, B.L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (1995). Good and bad humor: Biochemical bases of personality and its disorders. Psychological Science, 6, 325–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gülgöz, S. (2002). Five-Factor Model and NEO-PI-R in Turkey. In: McCrae, R.R., Allik, J. (eds) The Five-Factor Model of Personality Across Cultures. International and Cultural Psychology Series. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0763-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0763-5_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-47355-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0763-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics