Skip to main content

Skiba Thresholds in Optimal Control of Illicit Drug Use

  • Chapter
Optimal Control and Differential Games

Part of the book series: Advances in Computational Management Science ((AICM,volume 5))

Abstract

During the last quarter of a century, dynamic models with multiple steady states have been studied in numerous areas of economics. The corresponding history-dependence of optimal paths constitutes a low-level form of complexity. The purpose of the present paper is to illustrate this fact for three selected models in the control of illicit drug consumption, which are validated with empirical data. In the first model, the dynamics of the current U.S. cocaine epidemic subject to law enforcement and treatment is studied. The second part augments the first model by taking into account the fact that enforcement activities influence not only the drug dynamics but also property crime. The third model investigates the influence of methadone maintenance treatment on the spread of HIV/HCV among injection drug users. In all three cases, a positive feedback effect, i.e. state-dependent initiation, is responsible for the occurrence of ‘Skiba points’ separating the basins of attraction of the multiple steady states.

This research was partly financed by the Austrian National Bank (ÖNB) under grant No.9414. We thank Maria Dworak and Julia Balta for providing files from their Master thesesthat were necessary to produce Sections 3 and 4, respectively. Finally, we thank Christian Almeder for revision of a preliminary version of this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andvig, J.C. (1991) “The economics of corruption: a survey,” Studi Economici 43, 57–94.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balta, J. (2002) Optimal Control of Methadone Treatment in Preventing Blood-Borne Disease, Master Thesis, Institute for Econometrics, Operations Research and Systems Theory, Vienna University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Becker, G.S. (1968) “Crime and punishment: an economic approach,” Journal of Political Economy 76, 169–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brock, W.A. and A.G. Malliaris (1989) Differential Equations,Stability and Chaos in Dynamical Economics (North Holland, Amsterdam).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Caulkins, J.P. (1993) “Local drug markets’ response to focused police enforcement,” Operations Research 41(5), 848–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Caulkins, J.P., M. Dworak, G. Feichtinger and G. Tragler (2000), “Price-raising drug enforcement and property crime: a dynamic model,” Journal of Economics 71(3), 227–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Caulkins, J.P., R.F. Hartl, G. Tragler and G. Feichtinger (2001), “Why politics makes strange bedfellows: dynamic model with DNS curves,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 111(2), 237–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Caulkins, J.P., C.P. Rydell, W.L. Schwabe and J. Chiesa (1997) Mandatory Minimum Drug Sentences: Throwing Away the Key or the Taxpayers’ Money? (RAND, Santa Monica).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dechert, W.D. and K. Nishimura (1983), “A complete characterization of optimal growth paths in an aggregated model with a non-concave production function,” Journal of Economic Theory 31(2), 332–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Deissenberg, C., G. Feichtinger, W. Semmler and F. Wirl (2001) “History dependence, multiple equilibria, and global dynamics in efficiently governed economies,” Research Report 258, Institute for Econometrics, Operations Research and Systems Theory, Vienna University of Technology; forthcoming in W. Barnett, C. Deissenberg and G. Feichtinger (eds.), Economic Complexity: Non-Linear Dynamics, Multi-Agents Economies, and Learning (Cam-bridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dworak, M. (1999) A Dynamic Model of Drug Enforcement and Property Crime, Master Thesis, Institute for Econometrics, Operations Research and Systems Theory, Vienna University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Feichtinger, G., W. Grienauer and G. Tragler (1997) “Optimal dynamic law enforcement,” Research Report 197, Institute for Econometrics, Operations Research and Systems Theory, Vienna University of Technology; forthcoming in European Journal of Operational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Feichtinger, G. and R.F. Hartl (1986) Optimale Kontrolle ökonomischer Prozesse - Anwendungen des Maximumprinzips in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Feichtinger, G. and F. Wirl (2000) “Instabilities in concave, dynamic, economic optimization,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 107, 277–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gavrila, C., H.A. Pollack, J.P. Caulkins, P.M. Kort, G. Feichtinger and G. Tragler (2002) “Optimal control of harm reduction in preventing HIV and Hepatitis C among drug users;” in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Haunschmied, J.L., G. Feichtinger, R.F. Harts and P.M. Kort (2001) “Keeping up with the technology pace: A DNS-curve in a limit cycle in a technology investment decision problem,” Research Report 262, Institute for Econometrics, Operations Research and Systems Theory, Vienna University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Haunschmied, J.L., P.M. Kort, R.F. Hartl and G. Feichtinger (2000) “A DNS-Curve in a two state capital accumulation model: a numerical analysis”. Research Report 242, Institute for Econometrics, Operations Research and Systems Theory, Vienna University of Technology; forthcoming in Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kleiman, M.A.R. (1993) “Enforcement swamping: a positive-feedback mechanism in rates of illicit activity,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling 17(2), 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Office of National Drug Control Policy (1998) The National Drug Control Strategy: 1998 (The White House, Washington, D.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pollack, H.A. (2000) “The cost-effectiveness of methadone in preventing blood-borne disease: a comparison of HIV and Hepatitis C,” Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Reuter, P. (1983) Disorganized Crime: The Economics of the Visible Hand (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Reuter, P. and M.A.R. Kleiman (1986) “Risks and prices: an economic analysis of drug enforcement,” in M. Tonry and N. Morris (eds.), Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research 7 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 289–340.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rydell, C.P. and S.S. Everingham (1994) Controlling Cocaine - Supply versus Demand Programs (RAND, Santa Monica).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schelling, T. (1973) “Hockey helmets, concealed weapons, and daylight saving: a study of binary choices with externalities,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 381–428.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schelling, T.C. (1978) Micromotives and Macrobehavior (W.W. Norton & Company, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Skiba, A.K. (1978) “Optimal growth with a convex-concave production function,” Econometrica 46, 527–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tragler, G. (1998) Optimal Control of Illicit Drug Consumption: Treatment versus Enforcement, PhD Thesis, Institute for Econometrics, Operations Research and Systems Theory, Vienna University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tragler, G., J.P. Caulkins and G. Feichtinger (2001) “Optimal dynamic allocation of treatment and enforcement in illicit drug control,” Operations Research 49(3), 352–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Feichtinger, G., Tragler, G. (2002). Skiba Thresholds in Optimal Control of Illicit Drug Use. In: Zaccour, G. (eds) Optimal Control and Differential Games. Advances in Computational Management Science, vol 5. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1047-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1047-5_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5368-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1047-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics