Skip to main content

The Nature of Bail Decisionmaking in Maricopa County

  • Chapter
Personal Liberty and Community Safety

Part of the book series: The Plenum Series in Crime and Justice ((PSIC))

  • 56 Accesses

Abstract

We have already described some features of the defendants and their cases entering the three court systems. In Chapter 6, we briefly contrasted the decisions made about each cohort of defendants and their detention or release outcomes. We found differences among the sites in the characteristics of defendants entering the court systems and in the kinds of offenses with which they had been charged. In reviewing the bail decisions made regarding the entering defendants and the subsequent use of pretrial release and detention, we again noted key differences—even between Dade and Maricopa counties, the jurisdictions with the most similar felony caseloads. For example, although the Boston Municipal Court generated the highest rate of release among its heavily misdemeanant caseload, it also produced by far the highest rates of defendant misconduct during pretrial release. Circuit court in Dade County managed to release 80 percent of its felony defendants before trial and yet still succeeded in producing, of the three sites, the lowest flight and crime rates among defendants on pretrial release. Finally, the Superior Court in Maricopa County released dramatically fewer defendants than its companion courts, about half the proportion of defendants released by the Dade court. However, the frequent resort to pretrial detention in that jurisdiction did not produce misconduct rates that were even as good as those found in Dade County.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For a detailed discussion of the principle of release under least restrictive conditions and analysis of state and federal laws, see Goldkamp (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Knowledge of nine variables was able to explain 70 percent of the variance in release versus detention of Maricopa defendants.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Severity of charge has not been found to relate to prediction of flight or crime during pretrial release, although kind of charged offense has.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goodness-of-fit chi-squared = 1.5; DF = 4; P value = 0.83; n = 1,211.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goodness-of-fit chi-squared = 13.73; DF= 17, P value = 0.69; n= 1,211.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goldkamp, J.S., Gottfredson, M.R., Jones, P.R., Weiland, D. (1995). The Nature of Bail Decisionmaking in Maricopa County. In: Personal Liberty and Community Safety. The Plenum Series in Crime and Justice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1821-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1821-1_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5736-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1821-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics