Skip to main content

e 2 = αh, The Only Physically Justified Formulation of Electron Charge, and the Resulting Electron Energy Paradigm

  • Chapter
Waves and Particles in Light and Matter
  • 288 Accesses

Abstract

It is shown that the formulation for the square of the electric charge given by e 2 = α h has priority over other formulations. It allows reference values to be defined for quantized representations of all electromagnetic quantities. A consequence of e 2 = α h is the formulation of the electron energy paradigm. It links five fundamental reference energies by means of the coupling constant a raised to different powers. As shown, this paradigm results from the experimental findings of atomic light spectra, Ohm’s law, 1/ƒ noise, the quantum Hall effect, the Aharonov-Bohm effect, and electron spin. An attempt to interpret the electron energy paradigm is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. K.von Klitzing, G. Dorda, and M. Pepper, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 494 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. R. E. Prange and S. M. Girvin, The Quantum Hall Effect (Springer, Berlin 1987).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. B. J. van Wees, H. van Houten, C. W. J. Beenakker, J. G. Williamson, L. P. Kouwenhoven, D. van der Marel, and C. T. Foxon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 848 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. D. A. Wharam, T. J. Thornton, R. Newbury, M. Pepper, H. Ahmed, J. E. F. Frost, D. G. Hasko, D. C. Peacock, D. A. Ritchie, and G. A. C. Jones, J. Phys. C 21 ,L209 (1988).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. R. C. Dynes, J. P Garno, and J. M. Rowell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 479 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. B. G. Orr, H. M. Jaeger and A. M. Goldman, Phys. Rev. B 32, 7586 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. B. G. Orr, H. M. Jaeger, A. M. Goldman, and C. G. Kuper, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 378 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. H. M. Jaeger, D. B. Haviland, A. M. Goldman, and B. G. Orr, Phys. Rev. B 34, 4920 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. R. G. Clark, S. R. Haynes, J. V. Branch, J. R. Mallet, A. M. Suckling, P. A. Wright, P. M. W. Oswald, J. J. Harris, and C. T. Foxon, Surface Sci. 229, 25 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Hajto, A. E. Owen, S. M. Gage, A. J. Snell, P. G. LeComber, and M. J. Rose, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1918 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. N. N. Bogoliubov, and D. V. Shirkov, Introduction to the Theory of Quantized Fields (Interscience Monographs in Physics and Astronomy 3, R. E. Marshak, ed.) (Wiley, New York, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  12. “Symbols, units and nomenclature in physics,” Document U.I.P. 11 (1965) S.U.N. 65-3.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. Dorda, Superlattices and Microstructures 7, 103 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. G. Dorda, Proceedings of the 12th General Conference of Condensed Matter Division, EPS ,Prague, April 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Dorda, Physica Scripta T ,45, 297 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifschitz, Quantenmechanik ,P. Ziesche, ed. (Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1979), p. 116.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. A. Webb, S. Washburn, C. P. Umbach, and R. B. Laibowitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 2696 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Washburn, C. P. Umbach, R. B. Laibowitz, and R. A. Webb, Phys. Rev. B 32, 4789 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. S. Washburn and R. A. Webb, Adv. Phys. 35, 375 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. F. N. Hooge, Phys. Rev. 29A, 139 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  21. F. N. Hooge, Physica B 83, 14 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. F. N. Hooge, Physica B 162, 344 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. L. K. J. Vandamme, Noise in Physical Systems and 1Noise ,M. Savelli, G. Lecoy, and J.-P. Nougier, eds. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1983), pp. 183–192.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dorda, G. (1994). e 2 = αh, The Only Physically Justified Formulation of Electron Charge, and the Resulting Electron Energy Paradigm. In: van der Merwe, A., Garuccio, A. (eds) Waves and Particles in Light and Matter. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2550-9_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2550-9_42

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6088-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-2550-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics