Abstract
Several parliamentary governance structures based upon a directly elected premier are analyzed through their effectivity functions.lt is shown that only collegial governance structures which provide a tight connection between the premier and her prefixed majority enjoy strong stability.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abdou J., Keiding H. (1991):Effectivity Functions in Social Choice. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Demange G. (1987): Nonmanipulable Cores. Econometrica 55, 1057–1074.
Kolpin V. (1991): Mixed Effectivity and the Essence of Stability. Social Choice and Welfare 8, 51–63.
Otten G.J., Borm P., Storcken T., Tijs S. (1995): Effectivity Functions and Associated Claim Game Correspondences. Games and Economic Behaviour 9, 172–190.
Peleg B. (1981): Coalition Formation in Simple Games with Dominant Players. International Journal of Game Theory 10, 11–33.
Peleg B. (1984): Game Theoretic Analysis of Voting in Committees. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schofield N. (1985): Social Choice and Democracy. Berlin: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vannucci, S. (2000). Effectivity Functions and Parliamentary Governance Structures. In: Patrone, F., García-Jurado, I., Tijs, S. (eds) Game Practice: Contributions from Applied Game Theory. Theory and Decision Library, vol 23. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4627-6_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4627-6_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7092-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4627-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive