Abstract
In time series problems, noise can be divided into two categories: dynamic noise which drives the process, and observational noise which is added in the measurement process, but does not influence future values of the system.In this framework, empirical volatilities (the squared relative returns of prices) exhibit a significant amount of observational noise. To model and predict their time evolution adequately, we estimate state space models that explicitly include observational noise. We obtain relaxation times for shocks in the logarithm of volatility. We compare these results with ordinary autoregres-sive models and find that autoregressive models underestimate the relaxation times by about two orders of magnitude due to their ignoring the distinction between observational and dynamic noise. This new interpretation of the dynamics of volatility in terms of relaxators in a state space model carries over to stochastic volatility models and to GARCH models, and is useful for several problems in finance, including risk management and the pricing of derivative securities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bollerslev T., Engle R. F. and Nelson D. B. (1995). ARCH models, in R. F. Engle and D. L. McFadden (eds), Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 4, North-Holland, New York, NY, chapter 49.
Brockwell P. J. and Davis R. A. (1991). Time Series: Theory and Methods, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Dacorogna M. M., Gauvreau C. L., Müller U. A., Olsen R. B. and Pictet O. V. (1996). Changing time scale for short-term forecasting in financial markets, Journal of Forecasting 15: 203–227.
Dempster A., Laird N. and Rubin D. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via EM algorithm, J. Roy. Stat Soc. 39: 1–38.
Diebold F. X. and Lopez J. A. (1995). Modeling volatility dynamics, in K. Hoover (ed.), Macroeconometrics: Developments, Tensions, and Prospects, Kluwer Academic Press, Boston, pp. 427–472.
Engle R. F. (ed.) (1995). ARCH: Selected Readings, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Fuller W. A. (1987). Measurement Error Models, John Wiley, New York.
Honerkamp J. (1993). Stochastic Dynamical Systems, VCH, New York.
Kalman R. E. (1960). A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems,Trans.ASME J. Basic Eng. Series D 82: 35–45.
Shephard N. (1996). Statistical aspects of ARCH and stochastic volatility, in D. R. Cox, D. V. Hinkley and O. E. Barndorff-Nielsen (eds), Time Series Models In Econometrics, Finance and Other Fields, Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 1–67.
Shumway R. and Stoffer D. (1982). An approach to time series smoothing and forecasting using the EM algorithm, J. Time Ser. Anal. 3: 253–264.
Weigend A. S., Mangeas M. and Srivastava A. N. (1995). Nonlinear gated experts for time series: Discovering regimes and avoiding overfitting, International Journal of Neural Systems 6: 373–399.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Timmer, J., Weigend, A.S. (1998). Modeling Financial Time Series Using State Space Models. In: Refenes, AP.N., Burgess, A.N., Moody, J.E. (eds) Decision Technologies for Computational Finance. Advances in Computational Management Science, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5625-1_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5625-1_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-8309-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5625-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive